These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3250579)

  • 1. Pressure relief capabilities of the Sof.Care bed and the Clinitron bed.
    Maklebust J; Siggreen MY; Mondoux L
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1988; 21():32, 36-41, 44. PubMed ID: 3250579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interface pressure measurements of support surfaces with subjects in the supine and 45-degree Fowler positions.
    Whittemore R; Bautista C; Smith C; Bruttomesso K
    J ET Nurs; 1993; 20(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 8347757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationship between body weight, body position, support surface, and tissue interface pressure at the sacrum.
    Rondorf-Klym LM; Langemo D
    Decubitus; 1993 Jan; 6(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 8427641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interface pressure comparison of healthy premature infants with various neonatal bed surfaces.
    Turnage-Carrier C; McLane KM; Gregurich MA
    Adv Neonatal Care; 2008 Jun; 8(3):176-84. PubMed ID: 18535423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The evaluation of five specialized support surfaces by use of a pressure-sensitive mat.
    Patel UH; Jones JT; Babbs CF; Bourland JD; Graber GP
    Decubitus; 1993 May; 6(3):28-31, 34, 36-7. PubMed ID: 8347281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A clinical comparison of two pressure-reducing surfaces in the management of pressure ulcers.
    Warner DJ
    Decubitus; 1992 May; 5(3):52-5, 58-60, 62-4. PubMed ID: 1596352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tissue interface pressure and estimated subcutaneous pressures of 11 different pressure-reducing support surfaces.
    Thompson-Bishop JY; Mottola CM
    Decubitus; 1992 Mar; 5(2):42-6, 48. PubMed ID: 1558691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantification of pressure relief using interface pressure and tissue perfusion in alternating pressure air mattresses.
    Rithalia SV; Gonsalkorale M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2000 Oct; 81(10):1364-9. PubMed ID: 11030502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of air-fluidized therapy with other support surfaces used to treat pressure ulcers in nursing home residents.
    Ochs RF; Horn SD; van Rijswijk L; Pietsch C; Smout RJ
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2005 Feb; 51(2):38-68. PubMed ID: 15699554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the effectiveness of two pressure-relieving surfaces: low-air-loss versus static fluid.
    Hardin JB; Cronin SN; Cahill K
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Sep; 46(9):50-6. PubMed ID: 11189541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Skin pressure measurements on various mattress surfaces in cancer patients.
    Berjian RA; Douglass HO; Holyoke ED; Goodwin PM; Priore RL
    Am J Phys Med; 1983 Oct; 62(5):217-26. PubMed ID: 6624882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of two pressure-relieving devices on the prevention of heel pressure ulcers.
    Tymec AC; Pieper B; Vollman K
    Adv Wound Care; 1997; 10(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 9204803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of elevating the head of bed on interface pressure in volunteers.
    Peterson M; Schwab W; McCutcheon K; van Oostrom JH; Gravenstein N; Caruso L
    Crit Care Med; 2008 Nov; 36(11):3038-42. PubMed ID: 18824905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laboratory measurement of the interface pressures applied by active therapy support surfaces: a consensus document.
    Tissue Viability Society
    J Tissue Viability; 2010 Feb; 19(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 20097075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pressure ulcer prevention in intensive care - a randomised control trial of two pressure-relieving devices.
    Theaker C; Kuper M; Soni N
    Anaesthesia; 2005 Apr; 60(4):395-9. PubMed ID: 15766343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The prevalence, management, equipment provision and outcome for patients with pressure ulceration identified in a wound care survey within one English health care district.
    Vowden KR; Vowden P
    J Tissue Viability; 2009 Feb; 18(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 19097794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the effectiveness of two support surfaces following myocutaneous flap surgery.
    Economides NG; Skoutakis VA; Carter CA; Smith VH
    Adv Wound Care; 1995; 8(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 7795873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interface skin pressures on four pressure-relieving devices.
    Counsell C; Seymour S; Guin P; Hudson A
    J Enterostomal Ther; 1990; 17(4):150-3. PubMed ID: 2380423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Continuous monitoring of interface pressure distribution in intensive care patients for pressure ulcer prevention.
    Sakai K; Sanada H; Matsui N; Nakagami G; Sugama J; Komiyama C; Yahagi N
    J Adv Nurs; 2009 Apr; 65(4):809-17. PubMed ID: 19228239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of alternating air mattresses using a time-based interface pressure threshold technique.
    Rithalia SV; Gonsalkorale M
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1998 Jun; 35(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 9651895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.