These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32506246)

  • 21. Who made the paintings: Artists or artificial intelligence? The effects of identity on liking and purchase intention.
    Gu L; Li Y
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():941163. PubMed ID: 35992393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perceived cognitive challenge predicts eye movements while viewing contemporary paintings.
    Ganczarek J; Pietras K; Rosiek R
    Psych J; 2020 Aug; 9(4):490-506. PubMed ID: 32462771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Aesthetic Preferences for Eastern and Western Traditional Visual Art: Identity Matters.
    Bao Y; Yang T; Lin X; Fang Y; Wang Y; Pöppel E; Lei Q
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1596. PubMed ID: 27812339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Aesthetic Evaluation of Digitally Reproduced Art Images.
    Reymond C; Pelowski M; Opwis K; Takala T; Mekler ED
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():615575. PubMed ID: 33362676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Inside the Michelangelo effect: The role of art and aesthetic attractiveness on perceived fatigue and hand kinematics in virtual painting.
    Iosa M; Bini F; Marinozzi F; Antonucci G; Pascucci S; Baghini G; Guarino V; Paolucci S; Morone G; Tieri G
    Psych J; 2022 Oct; 11(5):748-754. PubMed ID: 36168965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Combining universal beauty and cultural context in a unifying model of visual aesthetic experience.
    Redies C
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():218. PubMed ID: 25972799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Art in the eye of the beholder: the perception of art during monocular viewing.
    Finney GR; Heilman KM
    Cogn Behav Neurol; 2008 Mar; 21(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 18327016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Parkinson's disease and changes in the appreciation of art: A comparison of aesthetic and formal evaluations of paintings between PD patients and healthy controls.
    Lauring JO; Pelowski M; Specker E; Ishizu T; Haugbøl S; Hollunder B; Leder H; Stender J; Kupers R
    Brain Cogn; 2019 Nov; 136():103597. PubMed ID: 31491732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Subjective Ratings of
    Hayn-Leichsenring GU; Lehmann T; Redies C
    Iperception; 2017; 8(3):2041669517715474. PubMed ID: 28694958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Beauty in the blink of an eye: The time course of aesthetic experiences.
    Verhavert S; Wagemans J; Augustin MD
    Br J Psychol; 2018 Feb; 109(1):63-84. PubMed ID: 28805247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Psychological and neural responses to art embody viewer and artwork histories.
    Vartanian O; Kaufman JC
    Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Apr; 36(2):161-2. PubMed ID: 23507117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Familiarity and Novelty in Aesthetic Preference: The Effects of the Properties of the Artwork and the Beholder.
    Song J; Kwak Y; Kim CY
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():694927. PubMed ID: 34367021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Warm, lively, rough? Assessing agreement on aesthetic effects of artworks.
    Specker E; Forster M; Brinkmann H; Boddy J; Immelmann B; Goller J; Pelowski M; Rosenberg R; Leder H
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0232083. PubMed ID: 32401777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Intuitions about mathematical beauty: A case study in the aesthetic experience of ideas.
    Johnson SGB; Steinerberger S
    Cognition; 2019 Aug; 189():242-259. PubMed ID: 31015078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Neuroscience of aesthetics.
    Chatterjee A; Vartanian O
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2016 Apr; 1369(1):172-94. PubMed ID: 27037898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Towards a sensorimotor aesthetics of performing art.
    Calvo-Merino B; Jola C; Glaser DE; Haggard P
    Conscious Cogn; 2008 Sep; 17(3):911-22. PubMed ID: 18207423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Greater art classification does not necessarily predict better liking: Evidence from graffiti and other visual arts.
    Szubielska M; Ho R
    Psych J; 2022 Oct; 11(5):656-659. PubMed ID: 34288523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Is better beautiful or is beautiful better? Exploring the relationship between beauty and category structure.
    Sanders M; Davis T; Love BC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Jun; 20(3):566-73. PubMed ID: 23242799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A new conception of visual aesthetic sensitivity.
    Corradi G; Chuquichambi EG; Barrada JR; Clemente A; Nadal M
    Br J Psychol; 2020 Nov; 111(4):630-658. PubMed ID: 31587262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Gaze patterns reveal aesthetic distance while viewing art.
    Marin MM; Leder H
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2022 Aug; 1514(1):155-165. PubMed ID: 35610177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.