149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32506627)
1. Reflex cytology for triage of high-risk human papillomavirus positive self-sampled material in cervical cancer screening: a prospective cohort study.
Loopik DL; Melchers W; Vedder J; van den Brule A; Massuger L; Bekkers R; Siebers AG
BJOG; 2020 Dec; 127(13):1656-1663. PubMed ID: 32506627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The added value of digital imaging to reflex cytology for triage of high-risk human papillomavirus positive self-sampled material in cervical cancer screening: A prospective cohort study.
Wiersma D; Vinke A; Siebers AG; Melchers WJG; Bekkers RLM; Loopik DL
BJOG; 2023 Jan; 130(2):184-191. PubMed ID: 35993438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Experience with high-risk human papillomavirus testing on vaginal brush-based self-samples of non-attendees of the cervical screening program.
Gök M; van Kemenade FJ; Heideman DA; Berkhof J; Rozendaal L; Spruyt JW; Beliën JA; Babovic M; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ
Int J Cancer; 2012 Mar; 130(5):1128-35. PubMed ID: 21484793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Benefit and burden in the Dutch cytology-based vs high-risk human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer screening program.
Loopik DL; Koenjer LM; Siebers AG; Melchers WJG; Bekkers RLM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 224(2):200.e1-200.e9. PubMed ID: 32800820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effectiveness of HPV16 and HPV18 genotyping and cytology with different thresholds for the triage of human papillomavirus-based screening on self-collected samples.
Song F; Du H; Wang C; Huang X; Wu R;
PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234518. PubMed ID: 32525936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effectiveness of High-risk Human Papillomavirus Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening in China: A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized Clinical Trial.
Zhang J; Zhao Y; Dai Y; Dang L; Ma L; Yang C; Li Y; Kong L; Wei L; Zhang S; Liu J; Xi M; Chen L; Duan X; Xiao Q; Abulizi G; Zhang G; Hong Y; Gao X; Zhou Q; Xie X; Li L; Niyazi M; Zhang Z; Tuo J; Ding Y; Si M; Chen F; Song L; Qiao Y; Lang J
JAMA Oncol; 2021 Feb; 7(2):263-270. PubMed ID: 33377903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison Study of Self-Sampled and Physician-Sampled Specimens for High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Test and Cytology.
Satake H; Inaba N; Kanno K; Mihara M; Takagi Y; Kondo N; Sagae S
Acta Cytol; 2020; 64(5):433-441. PubMed ID: 32396902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of age and high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) status on the prevalence of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+) in women with persistent hrHPV-positive, cytology-negative screening samples: a prospective cohort study.
Tidy JA; Lyon R; Ellis K; Macdonald M; Palmer JE
BJOG; 2020 Sep; 127(10):1260-1267. PubMed ID: 32279427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Human Papillomavirus Genotype Detection and Cytology Using a New Self-Sampling Method.
Yabusaki H; Ono M; Shiina N; Shiina Y
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2024 May; 25(5):1673-1679. PubMed ID: 38809639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CyclinA1 Promoter Methylation in Self-Sampling Test.
Oranratanaphan S; Kengsakul M; Triratanachat S; Kitkumthorn N; Mutirangura A; Termrungruanglert W
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2020 Oct; 21(10):2913-2917. PubMed ID: 33112548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. DNA methylation analysis in self-sampled brush material as a triage test in hrHPV-positive women.
Boers A; Bosgraaf RP; van Leeuwen RW; Schuuring E; Heideman DA; Massuger LF; Verhoef VM; Bulten J; Melchers WJ; van der Zee AG; Bekkers RL; Wisman GB
Br J Cancer; 2014 Sep; 111(6):1095-101. PubMed ID: 25032730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Primary hrHPV DNA testing in cervical cancer screening: how to manage screen-positive women? A POBASCAM trial substudy.
Dijkstra MG; van Niekerk D; Rijkaart DC; van Kemenade FJ; Heideman DA; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ; Berkhof J
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2014 Jan; 23(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 23733907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identification of a methylation panel as an alternative triage to detect CIN3+ in hrHPV-positive self-samples from the population-based cervical cancer screening programme.
de Waard J; Bhattacharya A; de Boer MT; van Hemel BM; Esajas MD; Vermeulen KM; de Bock GH; Schuuring E; Wisman GBA
Clin Epigenetics; 2023 Jun; 15(1):103. PubMed ID: 37322534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Triage by methylation-marker testing versus cytology in women who test HPV-positive on self-collected cervicovaginal specimens (PROHTECT-3): a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.
Verhoef VM; Bosgraaf RP; van Kemenade FJ; Rozendaal L; Heideman DA; Hesselink AT; Bekkers RL; Steenbergen RD; Massuger LF; Melchers WJ; Bulten J; Overbeek LI; Berkhof J; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ
Lancet Oncol; 2014 Mar; 15(3):315-22. PubMed ID: 24529697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Human papillomavirus viral load as a useful triage tool for non-16/18 high-risk human papillomavirus positive women: A prospective screening cohort study.
Dong L; Wang MZ; Zhao XL; Feng RM; Hu SY; Zhang Q; Smith JS; Qiao YL; Zhao FH
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jan; 148(1):103-110. PubMed ID: 29169614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Test Accuracy of Human Papillomavirus in Urine for Detection of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.
Rohner E; Rahangdale L; Sanusi B; Knittel AK; Vaughan L; Chesko K; Faherty B; Tulenko SE; Schmitt JW; Romocki LS; Sivaraman V; Nelson JAE; Smith JS
J Clin Microbiol; 2020 Feb; 58(3):. PubMed ID: 31896666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic accuracy of high-risk HPV DNA genotyping for primary cervical cancer screening and triage of HPV-positive women, compared to cytology: preliminary results of the PIPAVIR study.
Chatzistamatiou K; Moysiadis T; Angelis E; Kaufmann A; Skenderi A; Jansen-Duerr P; Lekka I; Kilintzis V; Angelidou S; Katsiki E; Hagemann I; Tsertanidou A; Koch I; Boecher O; Soutschek E; Maglaveras N; Agorastos T
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 May; 295(5):1247-1257. PubMed ID: 28337594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical cancer screening by high risk HPV testing in routine practice: results at one year recall of high risk HPV-positive and cytology-negative women.
Del Mistro A; Frayle H; Ferro A; Callegaro S; Del Sole A; Stomeo A; Cirillo E; Fedato C; Pagni S; Barzon L; Zorzi M;
J Med Screen; 2014 Mar; 21(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 24488593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective cohort study examining cervical cancer screening methods in HIV-positive and HIV-negative Cambodian Women: a comparison of human papilloma virus testing, visualization with acetic acid and digital colposcopy.
Thay S; Goldstein A; Goldstein LS; Govind V; Lim K; Seang C
BMJ Open; 2019 Feb; 9(2):e026887. PubMed ID: 30804036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. BD-ProExC as adjunct molecular marker for improved detection of CIN2+ after HPV primary screening.
Depuydt CE; Makar AP; Ruymbeke MJ; Benoy IH; Vereecken AJ; Bogers JJ
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2011 Apr; 20(4):628-37. PubMed ID: 21297040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
