340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32507503)
1. Midwives perceptions: Birth unit environment and the implementation of best intrapartum care practices.
Malesela JML
Women Birth; 2021 Feb; 34(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 32507503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Midwives' experiences of the factors that facilitate normal birth among low risk women in public hospitals in Catalonia (Spain).
Anna MA; Olga CV; Rocío CS; Isabel SP; Xavier ET; Pablo RC; Montserrat PA; Cristina GB; Ramon E
Midwifery; 2020 Sep; 88():102752. PubMed ID: 32521407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Iranian midwives' lived experiences of providing continuous midwife-led intrapartum care: a qualitative study.
Amiri-Farahani L; Gharacheh M; Sadeghzadeh N; Peyravi H; Pezaro S
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Sep; 22(1):724. PubMed ID: 36151533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of the implementation of the model of integrated and humanised midwifery health services in Chile.
Binfa L; Pantoja L; Ortiz J; Gurovich M; Cavada G; Foster J
Midwifery; 2016 Apr; 35():53-61. PubMed ID: 27060401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Practice, skills and experience with the Pinard stethoscope for intrapartum Foetal monitoring: Focus group interviews with Norwegian midwives.
Engelhart CH; Nilsen ABV; Pay ASD; Maude R; Kaasen A; Blix E
Midwifery; 2022 May; 108():103288. PubMed ID: 35240433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Midwives' perceptions of being 'with woman': a phenomenological study.
Bradfield Z; Hauck Y; Duggan R; Kelly M
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Oct; 19(1):363. PubMed ID: 31638923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors hindering midwives' utilisation of alternative birth positions during labour in a selected public hospital.
Musie MR; Peu MD; Bhana-Pema V
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med; 2019 Sep; 11(1):e1-e8. PubMed ID: 31588769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improving the quality and content of midwives' discussions with low-risk women about their options for place of birth: Co-production and evaluation of an intervention package.
Henshall C; Taylor B; Goodwin L; Farre A; Jones ME; Kenyon S
Midwifery; 2018 Apr; 59():118-126. PubMed ID: 29421641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Support provided by midwives to women during labour in a public hospital, Limpopo Province, South Africa: a participant observation study.
Maputle MS
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Jun; 18(1):210. PubMed ID: 29871607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Exploring midwives' perception of confidence around facilitating water birth in Western Australia: A qualitative descriptive study.
Nicholls S; Hauck YL; Bayes S; Butt J
Midwifery; 2016 Feb; 33():73-81. PubMed ID: 26549568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conflicting contexts: midwives' interpretation of childbirth through photo elicitation.
Copeland F; Dahlen HG; Homer CS
Women Birth; 2014 Jun; 27(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 24373599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The birth bed: A qualitative study on the views of midwives regarding the use of the bed in the birth space.
Townsend B; Fenwick J; Thomson V; Foureur M
Women Birth; 2016 Feb; 29(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 26386523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implementation of normal childbirth guidelines among midwives: Adherence and influencing factors.
Zhao Y; Lu H; Lu J; Wang B
Women Birth; 2024 Feb; 37(1):215-222. PubMed ID: 37827891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A story of scrutiny and fear: Australian midwives' experiences of an external review of obstetric services, being involved with litigation and the impact on clinical practice.
Hood L; Fenwick J; Butt J
Midwifery; 2010 Jun; 26(3):268-85. PubMed ID: 18804902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Midwives' perceptions of women's mobile phone use and impact on care in birth suite.
Lewis L; Barnes C; Allan J; Roberts L; Lube D; Hauck YL
Midwifery; 2019 Sep; 76():142-147. PubMed ID: 31207448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A qualitative exploration of how midwives' and obstetricians' perception of risk affects care practices for low-risk women and normal birth.
Healy S; Humphreys E; Kennedy C
Women Birth; 2017 Oct; 30(5):367-375. PubMed ID: 28279637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of maternity units' intrapartum intervention rates and midwives' risk perception for women suitable for midwifery-led care.
Mead MM; Kornbrot D
Midwifery; 2004 Mar; 20(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 15020028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chinese midwives' perceptions on upright positions during the second stage of labour: A qualitative study.
Zang Y; Lu H; Zhang H; Zhang X; Yang M; Huang J
Midwifery; 2021 Jul; 98():102993. PubMed ID: 33823359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Midwives' perceptions of and experiences with normal physiologic birth: A qualitative systematic review.
Shorey S; Ng ED
Birth; 2023 Dec; 50(4):749-763. PubMed ID: 37712184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Culturally appropriate care to support maternal positions during the second stage of labour: Midwives' perspectives in South Africa.
Musie MR; Peu MD; Bhana-Pema V
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med; 2022 Apr; 14(1):e1-e9. PubMed ID: 35532110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
