133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32507578)
41. Outcome of the use of acellular-dermal matrix to assist implant-based breast reconstruction in a single centre.
Barber MD; Williams L; Anderson ED; Neades GT; Raine C; Young O; Kulkarni D; Young I; Dixon JM
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 25238954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Funnel usefulness in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction using periareolar incision with prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with acellular dermal matrix.
Woo J; Seung IH; Hong SE
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2020 Nov; 73(11):2016-2024. PubMed ID: 32921621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The "Empanada" Construct: Prepectoral Technique Refinement Utilizing a Composite Acellular Dermal Matrix Mesh Wrap.
Sayegh F; Zoghbi Y; Jacobs J; Salzberg CA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jun; 147(6):1082-1083. PubMed ID: 33961614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. A Prospective Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes of Subpectoral and Prepectoral Strattice-Based Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
Baker BG; Irri R; MacCallum V; Chattopadhyay R; Murphy J; Harvey JR
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 May; 141(5):1077-1084. PubMed ID: 29697602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Are All Acellular Dermal Matrices Created Equal?
Ranganathan K; Santosa KB; Lyons DA; Mand S; Xin M; Kidwell K; Brown DL; Wilkins EG; Momoh AO
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Oct; 136(4):647-653. PubMed ID: 26397242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Focus on technique: supporting the soft-tissue envelope in breast reconstruction.
Spear SL; Sher SR; Al-Attar A
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Nov; 130(5 Suppl 2):89S-94S. PubMed ID: 23096992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Does acellular dermal matrix really improve aesthetic outcome in tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction?
Ibrahim AM; Koolen PG; Ganor O; Markarian MK; Tobias AM; Lee BT; Lin SJ; Mureau MA
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2015 Jun; 39(3):359-68. PubMed ID: 25894022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Complications of acellular dermal matrices in breast surgery.
Israeli R
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Nov; 130(5 Suppl 2):159S-172S. PubMed ID: 23096966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Focus on technique: one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction.
Salzberg CA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Nov; 130(5 Suppl 2):95S-103S. PubMed ID: 23096993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Discussion: Capsular Contracture in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Examining the Role of Acellular Dermal Matrix Fenestrations.
Aliotta R; Gurunluoglu R
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Oct; 136(4):636-637. PubMed ID: 26397241
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Histologic analysis of fetal bovine derived acellular dermal matrix in tissue expander breast reconstruction.
Gaster RS; Berger AJ; Monica SD; Sweeney RT; Endress R; Lee GK
Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Apr; 70(4):447-53. PubMed ID: 23486129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Long-term studies on the integration of acellular porcine dermis as an implant shell and the effect on capsular fibrosis around silicone implants in a rat model.
Ludolph I; Gruener JS; Kengelbach-Weigand A; Fiessler C; Horch RE; Schmitz M
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Sep; 72(9):1555-1563. PubMed ID: 31202696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Direct-to-Implant as a Frontline Option for Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study With 2-Stage Reconstruction.
Han HH; Kim HB; Kim EK; Eom JS
Ann Plast Surg; 2018 Sep; 81(3):274-279. PubMed ID: 29916885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Biological implant in single-stage reconstruction of mammary gland for cancer].
Zikiriakhodzhaev AD; Ermoshchenkova MV
Khirurgiia (Mosk); 2015; (1):35-40. PubMed ID: 25909549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Revisions in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: How Does Direct-to-Implant Measure Up?
Clarke-Pearson EM; Lin AM; Hertl C; Austen WG; Colwell AS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Jun; 137(6):1690-1699. PubMed ID: 27219225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Discussion: Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Are All Acellular Dermal Matrices Created Equal?
Wagner DS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Oct; 136(4):654-656. PubMed ID: 26397243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. The impact of conflicts of interest in plastic surgery: an analysis of acellular dermal matrix, implant-based breast reconstruction.
Lopez J; Prifogle E; Nyame TT; Milton J; May JW
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Jun; 133(6):1328-1334. PubMed ID: 24867714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Preliminary Results Supporting the Bacterial Hypothesis in Red Breast Syndrome following Postmastectomy Acellular Dermal Matrix- and Implant-Based Reconstructions.
Danino MA; El Khatib AM; Doucet O; Dao L; Efanov JI; Bou-Merhi JS; Iliescu-Nelea M
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Dec; 144(6):988e-992e. PubMed ID: 31764635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The role of acellular dermal matrices in capsular contracture: a review of the evidence.
Basu CB; Jeffers L
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Nov; 130(5 Suppl 2):118S-124S. PubMed ID: 23096960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Acellular Dermal Matrix-sparing Direct-to-implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study Including Cost Analysis.
Viezel-Mathieu A; Alnaif N; Aljerian A; Safran T; Brabant G; Boileau JF; Dionisopoulos T
Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Feb; 84(2):139-143. PubMed ID: 31335468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
