These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32508268)

  • 1. Utilization of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Microscope-Based Fatty Vacuole Quantification in a Fatty Liver Model in Mice.
    Ramot Y; Zandani G; Madar Z; Deshmukh S; Nyska A
    Toxicol Pathol; 2020 Jul; 48(5):702-707. PubMed ID: 32508268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Microscope-Based Automated Quantification of Liver Fibrosis in Mice Using a Deep Learning Algorithm.
    Ramot Y; Deshpande A; Morello V; Michieli P; Shlomov T; Nyska A
    Toxicol Pathol; 2021 Jul; 49(5):1126-1133. PubMed ID: 33769147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of Deep Learning in Quantitative Analysis of 2-Dimensional Ultrasound Imaging of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.
    Cao W; An X; Cong L; Lyu C; Zhou Q; Guo R
    J Ultrasound Med; 2020 Jan; 39(1):51-59. PubMed ID: 31222786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Deep Learning-Based Image Analysis of Liver Steatosis in Mouse Models.
    Mairinoja L; Heikelä H; Blom S; Kumar D; Knuuttila A; Boyd S; Sjöblom N; Birkman EM; Rinne P; Ruusuvuori P; Strauss L; Poutanen M
    Am J Pathol; 2023 Aug; 193(8):1072-1080. PubMed ID: 37236505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of a fully automated liver segmentation algorithm using multi-scale deep reinforcement learning and comparison versus manual segmentation.
    Winkel DJ; Weikert TJ; Breit HC; Chabin G; Gibson E; Heye TJ; Comaniciu D; Boll DT
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 May; 126():108918. PubMed ID: 32171914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automatic classification of white regions in liver biopsies by supervised machine learning.
    Vanderbeck S; Bockhorst J; Komorowski R; Kleiner DE; Gawrieh S
    Hum Pathol; 2014 Apr; 45(4):785-92. PubMed ID: 24565203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Artificial intelligence in medical imaging of the liver.
    Zhou LQ; Wang JY; Yu SY; Wu GG; Wei Q; Deng YB; Wu XL; Cui XW; Dietrich CF
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Feb; 25(6):672-682. PubMed ID: 30783371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantification of hepatic steatosis in histologic images by deep learning method.
    Yang F; Jia X; Lei P; He Y; Xiang Y; Jiao J; Zhou S; Qian W; Duan Q
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2019; 27(6):1033-1045. PubMed ID: 31744039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Artificial Intelligence-Based Screening for Mycobacteria in Whole-Slide Images of Tissue Samples.
    Pantanowitz L; Wu U; Seigh L; LoPresti E; Yeh FC; Salgia P; Michelow P; Hazelhurst S; Chen WY; Hartman D; Yeh CY
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2021 Jun; 156(1):117-128. PubMed ID: 33527136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning in oncologic histopathology.
    Sultan AS; Elgharib MA; Tavares T; Jessri M; Basile JR
    J Oral Pathol Med; 2020 Oct; 49(9):849-856. PubMed ID: 32449232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automation, machine learning, and artificial intelligence in echocardiography: A brave new world.
    Gandhi S; Mosleh W; Shen J; Chow CM
    Echocardiography; 2018 Sep; 35(9):1402-1418. PubMed ID: 29974498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mini Review: The Last Mile-Opportunities and Challenges for Machine Learning in Digital Toxicologic Pathology.
    Turner OC; Knight B; Zuraw A; Litjens G; Rudmann DG
    Toxicol Pathol; 2021 Jun; 49(4):714-719. PubMed ID: 33590805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Artificial intelligence in digital histopathology for predicting patient prognosis and treatment efficacy in breast cancer.
    McCaffrey C; Jahangir C; Murphy C; Burke C; Gallagher WM; Rahman A
    Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2024 May; 24(5):363-377. PubMed ID: 38655907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deep learning quantification of percent steatosis in donor liver biopsy frozen sections.
    Sun L; Marsh JN; Matlock MK; Chen L; Gaut JP; Brunt EM; Swamidass SJ; Liu TC
    EBioMedicine; 2020 Oct; 60():103029. PubMed ID: 32980688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of two artificial intelligence-augmented ECG approaches: Machine learning and deep learning.
    Kashou AH; May AM; Noseworthy PA
    J Electrocardiol; 2023; 79():75-80. PubMed ID: 36989954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. AI-based computer-aided diagnosis (AI-CAD): the latest review to read first.
    Fujita H
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2020 Mar; 13(1):6-19. PubMed ID: 31898014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Deep learning for liver tumor diagnosis part II: convolutional neural network interpretation using radiologic imaging features.
    Wang CJ; Hamm CA; Savic LJ; Ferrante M; Schobert I; Schlachter T; Lin M; Weinreb JC; Duncan JS; Chapiro J; Letzen B
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Jul; 29(7):3348-3357. PubMed ID: 31093705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Artificial intelligence and algorithmic computational pathology: an introduction with renal allograft examples.
    Farris AB; Vizcarra J; Amgad M; Cooper LAD; Gutman D; Hogan J
    Histopathology; 2021 May; 78(6):791-804. PubMed ID: 33211332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Artificial Intelligence in Intracoronary Imaging.
    Fedewa R; Puri R; Fleischman E; Lee J; Prabhu D; Wilson DL; Vince DG; Fleischman A
    Curr Cardiol Rep; 2020 May; 22(7):46. PubMed ID: 32472189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Cognitive Computing: What Do These Terms Mean and How Will They Impact Health Care?
    Bini SA
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Aug; 33(8):2358-2361. PubMed ID: 29656964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.