These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32508486)

  • 21. A comprehensive survey of AI-enabled phishing attacks detection techniques.
    Basit A; Zafar M; Liu X; Javed AR; Jalil Z; Kifayat K
    Telecommun Syst; 2021; 76(1):139-154. PubMed ID: 33110340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Why Employees (Still) Click on Phishing Links: Investigation in Hospitals.
    Jalali MS; Bruckes M; Westmattelmann D; Schewe G
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jan; 22(1):e16775. PubMed ID: 32012071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Phishing in healthcare organisations: threats, mitigation and approaches.
    Priestman W; Anstis T; Sebire IG; Sridharan S; Sebire NJ
    BMJ Health Care Inform; 2019 Sep; 26(1):. PubMed ID: 31488498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. "Alexa, What's a Phishing Email?": Training users to spot phishing emails using a voice assistant.
    Sharevski F; Jachim P
    EURASIP J Inf Secur; 2022; 2022(1):7. PubMed ID: 36466991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cloud-based email phishing attack using machine and deep learning algorithm.
    Butt UA; Amin R; Aldabbas H; Mohan S; Alouffi B; Ahmadian A
    Complex Intell Systems; 2023; 9(3):3043-3070. PubMed ID: 35668732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The development of phishing during the COVID-19 pandemic: An analysis of over 1100 targeted domains.
    Hoheisel R; van Capelleveen G; Sarmah DK; Junger M
    Comput Secur; 2023 May; 128():103158. PubMed ID: 36883044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Phishing vulnerability compounded by older age, apolipoprotein E e4 genotype, and lower cognition.
    Pehlivanoglu D; Shoenfelt A; Hakim Z; Heemskerk A; Zhen J; Mosqueda M; Wilson RC; Huentelman M; Grilli MD; Turner G; Spreng RN; Ebner NC
    PNAS Nexus; 2024 Aug; 3(8):pgae296. PubMed ID: 39118834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Role of Health Concerns in Phishing Susceptibility: Survey Design Study.
    Abdelhamid M
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 May; 22(5):e18394. PubMed ID: 32364511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Setting Priorities in Behavioral Interventions: An Application to Reducing Phishing Risk.
    Canfield CI; Fischhoff B
    Risk Anal; 2018 Apr; 38(4):826-838. PubMed ID: 29023908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Susceptibility to phishing on social network sites: A personality information processing model.
    Frauenstein ED; Flowerday S
    Comput Secur; 2020 Jul; 94():101862. PubMed ID: 32501314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. It's the deceiver and the receiver: Individual differences in phishing susceptibility and false positives with item profiling.
    Kleitman S; Law MKH; Kay J
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205089. PubMed ID: 30365492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Is This Phishing? Older Age Is Associated With Greater Difficulty Discriminating Between Safe and Malicious Emails.
    Grilli MD; McVeigh KS; Hakim ZM; Wank AA; Getz SJ; Levin BE; Ebner NC; Wilson RC
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2021 Oct; 76(9):1711-1715. PubMed ID: 33378418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Role of Cue Utilization and Cognitive Load in the Recognition of Phishing Emails.
    Nasser G; Morrison BW; Bayl-Smith P; Taib R; Gayed M; Wiggins MW
    Front Big Data; 2020; 3():546860. PubMed ID: 33693413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Which Phish Is on the Hook? Phishing Vulnerability for Older Versus Younger Adults.
    Sarno DM; Lewis JE; Bohil CJ; Neider MB
    Hum Factors; 2020 Aug; 62(5):704-717. PubMed ID: 31237787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of automation trust tendency, system reliability and feedback on users' phishing detection.
    Zhou Y; Cui X; Qu W; Ge Y
    Appl Ergon; 2022 Jul; 102():103754. PubMed ID: 35339760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Advancing Phishing Email Detection: A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Models.
    Altwaijry N; Al-Turaiki I; Alotaibi R; Alakeel F
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Mar; 24(7):. PubMed ID: 38610289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cybersecurity Awareness Enhancement: A Study of the Effects of Age and Gender of Thai Employees Associated with Phishing Attacks.
    Daengsi T; Pornpongtechavanich P; Wuttidittachotti P
    Educ Inf Technol (Dordr); 2022; 27(4):4729-4752. PubMed ID: 34803469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Email phishing and signal detection: How persuasion principles and personality influence response patterns and accuracy.
    Lawson P; Pearson CJ; Crowson A; Mayhorn CB
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Jul; 86():103084. PubMed ID: 32174448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Interoceptive Accuracy Enhances Deception Detection in Older Adults.
    Heemskerk A; Lin T; Pehlivanoglu D; Hakim Z; Valdes-Hernandez PA; Ten Brinke L; Grilli MD; Wilson RC; Turner GR; Spreng RN; Ebner NC
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2024 Nov; 79(11):. PubMed ID: 39297532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of a mandatory phishing training program for high-risk employees at a US healthcare system.
    Gordon WJ; Wright A; Glynn RJ; Kadakia J; Mazzone C; Leinbach E; Landman A
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2019 Jun; 26(6):547-552. PubMed ID: 30861069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.