210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32508700)
1. Both High Cognitive Load and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Right Inferior Frontal Cortex Make Truth and Lie Responses More Similar.
Sánchez N; Masip J; Gómez-Ariza CJ
Front Psychol; 2020; 11():776. PubMed ID: 32508700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does the inferior frontal sulcus play a functional role in deception? A neuronavigated theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation study.
Verschuere B; Schuhmann T; Sack AT
Front Hum Neurosci; 2012; 6():284. PubMed ID: 23087636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lie-specific involvement of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in deception.
Priori A; Mameli F; Cogiamanian F; Marceglia S; Tiriticco M; Mrakic-Sposta S; Ferrucci R; Zago S; Polezzi D; Sartori G
Cereb Cortex; 2008 Feb; 18(2):451-5. PubMed ID: 17584853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex specifically processes general - but not personal - knowledge deception: Multiple brain networks for lying.
Mameli F; Mrakic-Sposta S; Vergari M; Fumagalli M; Macis M; Ferrucci R; Nordio F; Consonni D; Sartori G; Priori A
Behav Brain Res; 2010 Aug; 211(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 20307584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Temporoparietal Junction and Inferior Frontal Cortex Improves Imitation-Inhibition and Perspective-Taking with no Effect on the Autism-Spectrum Quotient Score.
Nobusako S; Nishi Y; Nishi Y; Shuto T; Asano D; Osumi M; Morioka S
Front Behav Neurosci; 2017; 11():84. PubMed ID: 28536512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The truth about lying: inhibition of the anterior prefrontal cortex improves deceptive behavior.
Karim AA; Schneider M; Lotze M; Veit R; Sauseng P; Braun C; Birbaumer N
Cereb Cortex; 2010 Jan; 20(1):205-13. PubMed ID: 19443622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Deceptive Intentions: Can Cues to Deception Be Measured before a Lie Is Even Stated?
Ströfer S; Noordzij ML; Ufkes EG; Giebels E
PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125237. PubMed ID: 26018573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Explicit Instructions Increase Cognitive Costs of Deception in Predictable Social Context.
Falkiewicz M; Sarzyńska J; Babula J; Szatkowska I; Grabowska A; Nęcka E
Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1863. PubMed ID: 26696929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of sketching while narrating on information elicitation and deception detection in multiple interviews.
Deeb H; Vrij A; Leal S; Burkhardt J
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Feb; 213():103236. PubMed ID: 33360343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. When deception becomes easy: the effects of task switching and goal neglect on the truth proportion effect.
Van Bockstaele B; Wilhelm C; Meijer E; Debey E; Verschuere B
Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1666. PubMed ID: 26579047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Let the man choose what to do: Neural correlates of spontaneous lying and truth-telling.
Yin L; Reuter M; Weber B
Brain Cogn; 2016 Feb; 102():13-25. PubMed ID: 26685089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does Gender Make a Difference in Deception? The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex.
Gao M; Yang X; Shi J; Lin Y; Chen S
Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1321. PubMed ID: 30177894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Individual differences in judging deception: accuracy and bias.
Bond CF; Depaulo BM
Psychol Bull; 2008 Jul; 134(4):477-92. PubMed ID: 18605814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Right inferior frontal gyrus activation as a neural marker of successful lying.
Vartanian O; Kwantes PJ; Mandel DR; Bouak F; Nakashima A; Smith I; Lam Q
Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():616. PubMed ID: 24106468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Truth and lies in your eyes: Pupil dilation of White participants in truthful and deceptive responses to White and Black partners.
Trifiletti E; D'Ascenzo S; Lugli L; Cocco VM; Di Bernardo GA; Iani C; Rubichi S; Nicoletti R; Vezzali L
PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0239512. PubMed ID: 33048934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detecting spontaneous deception in the brain.
Feng YJ; Hung SM; Hsieh PJ
Hum Brain Mapp; 2022 Jul; 43(10):3257-3269. PubMed ID: 35344258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Learning to lie: effects of practice on the cognitive cost of lying.
Van Bockstaele B; Verschuere B; Moens T; Suchotzki K; Debey E; Spruyt A
Front Psychol; 2012; 3():526. PubMed ID: 23226137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A reverse order interview does not aid deception detection regarding intentions.
Fenn E; McGuire M; Langben S; Blandón-Gitlin I
Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1298. PubMed ID: 26379610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lie, truth, lie: the role of task switching in a deception context.
Debey E; Liefooghe B; De Houwer J; Verschuere B
Psychol Res; 2015 May; 79(3):478-88. PubMed ID: 24923778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Electrocortical Signature of Successful and Unsuccessful Deception in a Face-to-Face Social Interaction.
Wagner-Altendorf TA; van der Lugt AH; Banfield JF; Meyer C; Rohrbach C; Heldmann M; Münte TF
Front Hum Neurosci; 2020; 14():277. PubMed ID: 32765242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
