289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32509090)
1. Diagnostic performances of the KWAK-TIRADS classification, elasticity score, and Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology of TI-RADS category 4 thyroid nodules.
Huang S; Meng N; Pan M; Yu B; Liu J; Deng K; Hu M; Zhou H; Qin C
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2020; 13(5):1159-1168. PubMed ID: 32509090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison among TIRADS (ACR TI-RADS and KWAK- TI-RADS) and 2015 ATA Guidelines in the diagnostic efficiency of thyroid nodules.
Gao L; Xi X; Jiang Y; Yang X; Wang Y; Zhu S; Lai X; Zhang X; Zhao R; Zhang B
Endocrine; 2019 Apr; 64(1):90-96. PubMed ID: 30659427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3.
Wu Y; Xu T; Cao X; Zhao X; Deng H; Wang J; Li X; Yao Q; Ye X; Shen M; Wu X
Cancer Biol Med; 2019 Feb; 16(1):131-138. PubMed ID: 31119053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance of EU-TIRADS in Discriminating Benign from Malignant Thyroid Nodules: A Prospective Study in One Referral Center.
Kovatcheva RD; Shinkov AD; Dimitrova ID; Ivanova RB; Vidinov KN; Ivanova RS
Eur Thyroid J; 2021 Feb; 9(6):304-312. PubMed ID: 33718254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Diagnostic values of BRAF(V600E) mutation analysis and Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology in thyroid nodules with TIRADS 4 and 5].
Han Y; Zhao BW; Li SY; Lyu JG; Shou JD; Xu HS; Lou HY; Xu LL; Gao L; Xu SX; Zhu J
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Sep; 52(9):686-691. PubMed ID: 28910894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Value of TIRADS, BSRTC and FNA-BRAF V600E mutation analysis in differentiating high-risk thyroid nodules.
Zhang YZ; Xu T; Cui D; Li X; Yao Q; Gong HY; Liu XY; Chen HH; Jiang L; Ye XH; Zhang ZH; Shen MP; Duan Y; Yang T; Wu XH
Sci Rep; 2015 Nov; 5():16927. PubMed ID: 26597052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Explore the Diagnostic Efficiency of Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems by Comparing With the Other Four Systems (ACR TI-RADS, Kwak-TIRADS, KSThR-TIRADS, and EU-TIRADS): A Single-Center Study.
Qi Q; Zhou A; Guo S; Huang X; Chen S; Li Y; Xu P
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2021; 12():763897. PubMed ID: 34777258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pattern-based vs. score-based guidelines using ultrasound features have different strengths in risk stratification of thyroid nodules.
Yoon JH; Lee HS; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Park VY; Kwak JY
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):3793-3802. PubMed ID: 32088739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ACR TI-RADS and ATA US scores are helpful for the management of thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology.
Barbosa TLM; Junior COM; Graf H; Cavalvanti T; Trippia MA; da Silveira Ugino RT; de Oliveira GL; Granella VH; de Carvalho GA
BMC Endocr Disord; 2019 Oct; 19(1):112. PubMed ID: 31664992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Prospective Study to Evaluate the Reliability of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System in Differentiation between Benign and Malignant Thyroid Lesions.
Srinivas MN; Amogh VN; Gautam MS; Prathyusha IS; Vikram NR; Retnam MK; Balakrishna BV; Kudva N
J Clin Imaging Sci; 2016; 6():5. PubMed ID: 27014501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the Bethesda System and the ACR TIRADS in an Endemic Goiter Region.
Karaagac M; Sarigoz T; Ertan T; Topuz O
Endocr Res; 2020 Nov; 45(4):226-232. PubMed ID: 32729365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Accuracy of two thyroid imaging, reporting and data systems for differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules].
Lai S; Chen Y; Chen Z; Wang L; Cong S; Kuang J
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2020 Mar; 40(3):400-406. PubMed ID: 32376572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation between Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System and Bethesda System of Reporting of Thyroid Cytopathology of Thyroid Nodule: A Single Center Experience.
Biswas A; Basu K; De S; Karmakar S; De D; Sengupta M; Ghosh S
J Cytol; 2020; 37(4):193-199. PubMed ID: 33776260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic Efficacy of Ultrasound, Cytology, and BRAF
Du J; Han R; Chen C; Ma X; Shen Y; Chen J; Li F
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():746776. PubMed ID: 35047385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic Accuracy of Five Different Classification Systems for Thyroid Nodules: A Prospective, Comparative Study.
Orhan Soylemez UP; Gunduz N
J Ultrasound Med; 2022 May; 41(5):1125-1136. PubMed ID: 34370333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Different Risk-Stratification Systems for the Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules.
Shen Y; Liu M; He J; Wu S; Chen M; Wan Y; Gao L; Cai X; Ding J; Fu X
Front Oncol; 2019; 9():378. PubMed ID: 31139568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasound Patterns by K-TIRADS and 2015 ATA Guidelines in Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules and Follicular Lesions of Undetermined Significance.
Hong HS; Lee JY
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Aug; 213(2):444-450. PubMed ID: 31039023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Non-Marked Hypoechogenic Nodules: Multicenter Study on the Thyroid Malignancy Risk Stratification and Accuracy Based on TIRADS Systems Comparison.
Prieditis P; Radzina M; Mikijanska M; Liepa M; Stepanovs K; Grani G; Durante C; Lamartina L; Trimboli P; Cantisani V
Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Feb; 58(2):. PubMed ID: 35208581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of the Kwak Thyroid Image Reporting and Data System (K-TIRADS) in differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Migda B; Migda M; Migda MS; Slapa RZ
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jun; 28(6):2380-2388. PubMed ID: 29294156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Thyroid Nodules: Nondiagnostic Cytologic Results according to Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System before and after Application of the Bethesda System.
Yoon JH; Lee HS; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Kwak JY
Radiology; 2015 Aug; 276(2):579-87. PubMed ID: 25848904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
