BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32509107)

  • 1. A Comparison of Muscle Activation Among the Front Squat, Overhead Squat, Back Extension and Plank.
    Bautista D; Durke D; Cotter JA; Escobar KA; Schick EE
    Int J Exerc Sci; 2020; 13(1):714-722. PubMed ID: 32509107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electromyographic and kinetic comparison of the back squat and overhead squat.
    Aspe RR; Swinton PA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Oct; 28(10):2827-36. PubMed ID: 24662228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Trunk Muscle Activity Between Traditional Plank Exercise and Plank Exercise With Isometric Contraction of Ankle Muscles in Subjects With Chronic Low Back Pain.
    Choi JH; Kim DE; Cynn HS
    J Strength Cond Res; 2021 Sep; 35(9):2407-2413. PubMed ID: 31136542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in Muscular Activity in Different Stable and Unstable Conditions on Aquatic Platforms.
    Conceição A; Fernandes O; Baia M; Parraca JA; Gonçalves B; Batalha N
    Biology (Basel); 2022 Nov; 11(11):. PubMed ID: 36358344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of resistance training status on trunk muscle activation in a fatiguing set of heavy back squats.
    Clark DR; Lambert MI; Grigson C; Hunter AM
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2021 Feb; 121(2):597-608. PubMed ID: 33206252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Activation of Gluteal, Thigh, and Lower Back Muscles in Different Squat Variations Performed by Competitive Bodybuilders: Implications for Resistance Training.
    Coratella G; Tornatore G; Caccavale F; Longo S; Esposito F; Cè E
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jan; 18(2):. PubMed ID: 33477561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An electromyographical comparison of trunk muscle activity during isometric trunk and dynamic strengthening exercises.
    Comfort P; Pearson SJ; Mather D
    J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Jan; 25(1):149-54. PubMed ID: 21157393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Kinematic and EMG activities during front and back squat variations in maximum loads.
    Yavuz HU; Erdağ D; Amca AM; Aritan S
    J Sports Sci; 2015; 33(10):1058-66. PubMed ID: 25630691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trunk muscle activity during different types of low weighted squat exercises in normal and forefoot standing conditions.
    Roth R; Donath L; Faude O; Cresswell AG
    J Sports Sci; 2020 Dec; 38(24):2774-2781. PubMed ID: 32746728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Core Muscle Activation between a Prone Bridge and 6-RM Back Squats.
    van den Tillaar R; Saeterbakken AH
    J Hum Kinet; 2018 Jun; 62():43-53. PubMed ID: 29922376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of external load on muscle activation during the barbell back squat.
    Martinez SC; Coons JM; Mehls KD
    Eur J Sport Sci; 2023 Jun; 23(6):975-982. PubMed ID: 35603722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of instruction, surface stability, and load intensity on trunk muscle activity.
    Bressel E; Willardson JM; Thompson B; Fontana FE
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Dec; 19(6):e500-4. PubMed ID: 19054687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Muscle Activation Among Supine, Prone, and Side Position Exercises With and Without a Swiss Ball.
    Escamilla RF; Lewis C; Pecson A; Imamura R; Andrews JR
    Sports Health; 2016 Jul; 8(4):372-9. PubMed ID: 27302152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electromyography activation of shoulder and trunk muscles is greater during closed chain compared to open chain exercises.
    Pozzi F; Plummer HA; Sanchez N; Lee Y; Michener LA
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2022 Feb; 62():102306. PubMed ID: 31151784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lower-limb and trunk muscle activation with back squats and weighted sled apparatus.
    Maddigan ME; Button DC; Behm DG
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Dec; 28(12):3346-53. PubMed ID: 25226330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Effect of Volitional Preemptive Abdominal Contraction on Biomechanical Measures During A Front Versus Back Loaded Barbell Squat.
    McCormick JB; Drusch AS; Lynch DJ; Seeber GH; Wilford KF; Hooper TL; Allen BS; O'Connell DG; Mena-Iturriaga MJ; Cooper KJ; Sizer PS
    Int J Sports Phys Ther; 2023; 18(4):831-844. PubMed ID: 37547830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Comparison of Gluteus Maximus, Biceps Femoris, and Vastus Lateralis Electromyographic Activity in the Back Squat and Barbell Hip Thrust Exercises.
    Contreras B; Vigotsky AD; Schoenfeld BJ; Beardsley C; Cronin J
    J Appl Biomech; 2015 Dec; 31(6):452-8. PubMed ID: 26214739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Activation of back and lower limb muscles during squat exercises with different trunk flexion.
    Lee TS; Song MY; Kwon YJ
    J Phys Ther Sci; 2016 Dec; 28(12):3407-3410. PubMed ID: 28174462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of Loads and Loading Position on the Muscle Activity of the Trunk and Lower Extremity during Squat Exercise.
    Park JH; Lee SJ; Shin HJ; Cho HY
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Oct; 19(20):. PubMed ID: 36294056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electromyographic activity of selected trunk, core, and thigh muscles in commonly used exercises for ACL rehabilitation.
    Khaiyat OA; Norris J
    J Phys Ther Sci; 2018 Apr; 30(4):642-648. PubMed ID: 29706723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.