BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32509406)

  • 1. Assessment of Ordinary Kriging and Inverse Distance Weighting Methods for Modeling Chromium and Cadmium Soil Pollution in E-Waste Sites in Douala, Cameroon.
    Ouabo RE; Sangodoyin AY; Ogundiran MB
    J Health Pollut; 2020 Jun; 10(26):200605. PubMed ID: 32509406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing ordinary kriging and inverse distance weighting for soil as pollution in Beijing.
    Qiao P; Lei M; Yang S; Yang J; Guo G; Zhou X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Jun; 25(16):15597-15608. PubMed ID: 29572743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Spatial Interpolation Methods and Pollution Assessment of Heavy Metals of Soil in Typical Areas].
    Ma HH; Yu T; Yang ZF; Hou QY; Zeng QL; Wang R
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2018 Oct; 39(10):4684-4693. PubMed ID: 30229617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screening and optimization of interpolation methods for mapping soil-borne polychlorinated biphenyls.
    Liu A; Qu C; Zhang J; Sun W; Shi C; Lima A; De Vivo B; Huang H; Palmisano M; Guarino A; Qi S; Albanese S
    Sci Total Environ; 2024 Feb; 913():169498. PubMed ID: 38154632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ordinary kriging vs inverse distance weighting: spatial interpolation of the sessile community of Madagascar reef, Gulf of Mexico.
    Zarco-Perello S; Simões N
    PeerJ; 2017; 5():e4078. PubMed ID: 29204321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison of various spatial interpolation methods for non-stationary regional soil mercury content].
    Hu KL; Li BG; Lu YZ; Zhang FR
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2004 May; 25(3):132-7. PubMed ID: 15327270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimizing spatial interpolation method and sampling number for predicting cadmium distribution in the largest shallow lake of North China.
    Wen L; Zhang L; Bai J; Wang Y; Wei Z; Liu H
    Chemosphere; 2022 Dec; 309(Pt 2):136789. PubMed ID: 36223825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of four methods for spatial interpolation of estimated atmospheric nitrogen deposition in South China.
    Qu L; Xiao H; Zheng N; Zhang Z; Xu Y
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Jan; 24(3):2578-2588. PubMed ID: 27826827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An assessment of air pollutant exposure methods in Mexico City, Mexico.
    Rivera-González LO; Zhang Z; Sánchez BN; Zhang K; Brown DG; Rojas-Bracho L; Osornio-Vargas A; Vadillo-Ortega F; O'Neill MS
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2015 May; 65(5):581-91. PubMed ID: 25947316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparison on the methods for spatial interpolation of the annual average precipitation in the Loess Plateau region].
    Yu Y; Wei W; Chen LD; Yang L; Zhang HD
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2015 Apr; 26(4):999-1006. PubMed ID: 26259439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A novel interpolation method to predict soil heavy metals based on a genetic algorithm and neural network model.
    Yin G; Chen X; Zhu H; Chen Z; Su C; He Z; Qiu J; Wang T
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jun; 825():153948. PubMed ID: 35219652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of predicting spatial contaminant distributions at industrial sites using partitioned interpolation method.
    Qiao P; Yang S; Wei W; Li P; Cheng Y; Liang S; Lei M; Chen T
    Environ Geochem Health; 2021 Jan; 43(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 32696201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of interpolation methods for the estimation of groundwater contamination in Andimeshk-Shush Plain, Southwest of Iran.
    Mirzaei R; Sakizadeh M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Feb; 23(3):2758-69. PubMed ID: 26446732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An Adaptive Weighting Algorithm for Interpolating the Soil Potassium Content.
    Liu W; Du P; Zhao Z; Zhang L
    Sci Rep; 2016 Apr; 6():23889. PubMed ID: 27051998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the common spatial interpolation methods used to analyze potentially toxic elements surrounding mining regions.
    Ding Q; Wang Y; Zhuang D
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Apr; 212():23-31. PubMed ID: 29427938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ecological Risk and Human Health Implications of Heavy Metals Contamination of Surface Soil in E-Waste Recycling Sites in Douala, Cameroun.
    Ouabo RE; Ogundiran MB; Sangodoyin AY; Babalola BA
    J Health Pollut; 2019 Mar; 9(21):190310. PubMed ID: 30931170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improvement of water table interpolation and groundwater storage volume using fuzzy computations.
    Masoumi Z; Rezaei A; Maleki J
    Environ Monit Assess; 2019 May; 191(6):401. PubMed ID: 31134353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving the mapping accuracy of soil heavy metals through an adaptive multi-fidelity interpolation method.
    Ju L; Guo S; Ruan X; Wang Y
    Environ Pollut; 2023 Aug; 330():121827. PubMed ID: 37187280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy Assessment of Kriging, artificial neural network, and a hybrid approach integrating spatial and terrain data in estimating and mapping of soil organic carbon.
    Kılıç M; Gündoğan R; Günal H; Cemek B
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0268658. PubMed ID: 35617376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial distribution and risk area assessment of
    Mondal S; Khan MR; Mukherjee A
    J Nematol; 2020; 52():1-16. PubMed ID: 32323933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.