These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32509708)
21. Quantification of facial asymmetry: A comparative study of landmark-based and surface-based registrations. Verhoeven T; Xi T; Schreurs R; Bergé S; Maal T J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 44(9):1131-6. PubMed ID: 27519663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The relationship between the changes in three-dimensional facial morphology and mandibular movement after orthognathic surgery. Kim DS; Huh KH; Lee SS; Heo MS; Choi SC; Hwang SJ; Yi WJ J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 41(7):686-93. PubMed ID: 23465640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Surgery-First Orthognathic Approach to Correct Facial Asymmetry: Artificial Intelligence-Based Cephalometric Analysis. Choi JW; Park H; Kim B S IH; Kim N; Kwon SM; Lee JY Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Mar; 149(3):496e-499e. PubMed ID: 35196690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessment of asymmetry in a normal occlusion sample and asymmetric patients with three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography: a study for a transverse reference plane. Park JU; Kook YA; Kim Y Angle Orthod; 2012 Sep; 82(5):860-7. PubMed ID: 22356706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Single-Splint, 2-Jaw Orthognathic Surgery for Correction of Facial Asymmetry: 3-Dimensional Planning and Surgical Execution. Sato N; Denadai R; Hung YT; Chung KH; Chou PY; Pai BCJ; Lo LJ; Lin HH J Craniofac Surg; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 38018966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Lower face cephalometry based on quadrilateral analysis with cone-beam computed tomography: a clinical pilot study. Dobai A; Vizkelety T; Markella Z; Rosta A; Kucsera Á; Barabás J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 21(2):207-218. PubMed ID: 28337564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Are Three-Dimensional Monitors More Appropriate Than Two-Dimensional Monitors in the Three-Dimensional Analysis? Ahn J; Hong J J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Jan; 28(1):e101-e104. PubMed ID: 27977484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. 2D and 3D analysis methods of facial asymmetry in comparison. Berssenbrügge P; Berlin NF; Kebeck G; Runte C; Jung S; Kleinheinz J; Dirksen D J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):e327-34. PubMed ID: 24507934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Deviation of landmarks in accordance with methods of establishing reference planes in three-dimensional facial CT evaluation. Yoon KW; Yoon SJ; Kang BC; Kim YH; Kook MS; Lee JS; Palomo JM Imaging Sci Dent; 2014 Sep; 44(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 25279341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Use of spherical coordinates to evaluate three-dimensional facial changes after orthognathic surgery. Yoon SJ; Wang RF; Ryu SY; Hwang HS; Kang BC; Lee JS; Palomo JM Imaging Sci Dent; 2014 Mar; 44(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 24701454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Three-dimensional investigation of facial surface asymmetries in skeletal malocclusion patients before and after orthodontic treatment combined with orthognathic surgery. Blockhaus M; Kochel J; Hartmann J; Stellzig-Eisenhauer A; Meyer-Marcotty P J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Mar; 75(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 24577016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The Drilling Guiding Templates and Pre-Bent Titanium Plates Improves the Operation Accuracy of Orthognathic Surgery With Computer-Aided Design and Computer-Aided Manufacturing Occlusal Splints for Patients With Facial Asymmetry. Hu P; Li J; Du W; Ji H; Xu C; Luo E J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Oct; 30(7):2144-2148. PubMed ID: 31232991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Three-dimensional evaluation of craniofacial asymmetry: an analysis using computed tomography. Yáñez-Vico RM; Iglesias-Linares A; Torres-Lagares D; Gutiérrez-Pérez JL; Solano-Reina E Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Oct; 15(5):729-36. PubMed ID: 20632049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. 3-dimensional facial simulation in orthognathic surgery: is it accurate? Schendel SA; Jacobson R; Khalessi S J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Aug; 71(8):1406-14. PubMed ID: 23642546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Quantitative analysis of craniofacial skeleton asymmetry by three-dimensional computed tomography]. Wang RC; Li GZ; Liu CM; Jia CY; Gao QW; Han Y Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Nov; 29(6):435-9. PubMed ID: 24624882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Landmarking and Frankfort Horizontal Plane Construction: Reproducibility of Conventional and Novel Landmarks. Dot G; Rafflenbeul F; Kerbrat A; Rouch P; Gajny L; Schouman T J Clin Med; 2021 Nov; 10(22):. PubMed ID: 34830583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A 3D cephalometric protocol for the accurate quantification of the craniofacial symmetry and facial growth. Pinheiro M; Ma X; Fagan MJ; McIntyre GT; Lin P; Sivamurthy G; Mossey PA J Biol Eng; 2019; 13():42. PubMed ID: 31131023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Frontal soft tissue analysis using a 3 dimensional camera following two-jaw rotational orthognathic surgery in skeletal class III patients. Choi JW; Lee JY; Oh TS; Kwon SM; Yang SJ; Koh KS J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 42(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 23870714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Imaging analysis of temporomandibular joint anatomy changes after intraoral condylectomy combined with orthognathic surgery]. Luo NJ; Li ZL; Yi B; Liang C; Wang X; Wang XX Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Jun; 51(6):350-6. PubMed ID: 27256529 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Intuitive Facial Imaging Method for Evaluation of Postoperative Swelling: A Combination of 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography and Laser Surface Scanning in Orthognathic Surgery. Yamamoto S; Miyachi H; Fujii H; Ochiai S; Watanabe S; Shimozato K J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Dec; 74(12):2506.e1-2506.e10. PubMed ID: 27669371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]