These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32510432)

  • 61. Forest policy in the EU and its influence on the plant diversity of woodlands.
    Wulf M
    J Environ Manage; 2003 Jan; 67(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 12659800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. A cross-continental comparison of plant and beetle responses to retention of forest patches during timber harvest.
    Baker SC; Halpern CB; Wardlaw TJ; Kern C; Edgar GJ; Thomson RJ; Bigley RE; Franklin JF; Gandhi KJ; Gustafsson L; Johnson S; Palik BJ; Spies TA; Steel EA; Weslien J; Strengbom J
    Ecol Appl; 2016 Dec; 26(8):2493-2504. PubMed ID: 27787926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Biodiversity differences between managed and unmanaged forests: meta-analysis of species richness in Europe.
    Paillet Y; Bergès L; Hjältén J; Odor P; Avon C; Bernhardt-Römermann M; Bijlsma RJ; De Bruyn L; Fuhr M; Grandin U; Kanka R; Lundin L; Luque S; Magura T; Matesanz S; Mészáros I; Sebastià MT; Schmidt W; Standovár T; Tóthmérész B; Uotila A; Valladares F; Vellak K; Virtanen R
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Feb; 24(1):101-12. PubMed ID: 20121845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. A framework to optimize the restoration and retention of large mature forest tracts in managed boreal landscapes.
    Bouchard M; Garet J
    Ecol Appl; 2016; 24(7):1689-704. PubMed ID: 29210231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Effects of national forest-management regimes on unprotected forests of the Himalaya.
    Brandt JS; Allendorf T; Radeloff V; Brooks J
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Dec; 31(6):1271-1282. PubMed ID: 28295561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Trade-offs in using European forests to meet climate objectives.
    Luyssaert S; Marie G; Valade A; Chen YY; Njakou Djomo S; Ryder J; Otto J; Naudts K; Lansø AS; Ghattas J; McGrath MJ
    Nature; 2018 Oct; 562(7726):259-262. PubMed ID: 30305744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. The Impact of Accounting for Future Wood Production in Global Vertebrate Biodiversity Assessments.
    Schulze K; Malek Ž; Verburg PH
    Environ Manage; 2020 Sep; 66(3):460-475. PubMed ID: 32627082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Stakeholder engagement in scenario development process - bioenergy production and biodiversity conservation in eastern Finland.
    Haatanen A; den Herder M; Leskinen P; Lindner M; Kurttila M; Salminen O
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Mar; 135():45-53. PubMed ID: 24509364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Combining aggregated and dispersed tree retention harvesting for conservation of vascular plant communities.
    Franklin CMA; Macdonald SE; Nielsen SE
    Ecol Appl; 2018 Oct; 28(7):1830-1840. PubMed ID: 29992697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Evidence of forest restoration success and the conservation value of community-owned forests in Southwest China using dung beetles as indicators.
    Sullivan CD; Slade EM; Bai M; Shi K; Riordan P
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0204764. PubMed ID: 30408034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The effects of logging residue extraction for energy on ecosystem services and biodiversity: A synthesis.
    Ranius T; Hämäläinen A; Egnell G; Olsson B; Eklöf K; Stendahl J; Rudolphi J; Sténs A; Felton A
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Mar; 209():409-425. PubMed ID: 29309965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Saproxylic and non-saproxylic beetle assemblages in boreal spruce forests of different age and forestry intensity.
    Stenbacka F; Hjältén J; Hilszczański J; Dynesius M
    Ecol Appl; 2010 Dec; 20(8):2310-21. PubMed ID: 21265460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Effects of productivity on biodiversity in forest ecosystems across the United States and China.
    Liang J; Watson JV; Zhou M; Lei X
    Conserv Biol; 2016 Apr; 30(2):308-17. PubMed ID: 26954431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Reconciling salvage logging of boreal forests with a tural-disturbance management model.
    Schmiegelow FK; Stepnisky DP; Stambaugh CA; Koivula M
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Aug; 20(4):971-83. PubMed ID: 16922214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. HeProMo: A decision support tool to estimate wood harvesting productivities.
    Holm S; Frutig F; Lemm R; Thees O; Schweier J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0244289. PubMed ID: 33382710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Burning of logged sites to protect beetles in managed boreal forests.
    Toivanen T; Kotiaho JS
    Conserv Biol; 2007 Dec; 21(6):1562-72. PubMed ID: 18173480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Forests in common: Learning from diversity of community forest arrangements in Europe.
    Lawrence A; Gatto P; Bogataj N; Lidestav G
    Ambio; 2021 Feb; 50(2):448-464. PubMed ID: 32920770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. The effectiveness of market-based conservation in the tropics: forest certification in Ecuador and Bolivia.
    Ebeling J; Yasué M
    J Environ Manage; 2009 Feb; 90(2):1145-53. PubMed ID: 18614273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. What does FSC forest certification contribute to biodiversity conservation in relation to national legislation?
    Lehtonen E; Gustafsson L; Lõhmus A; von Stedingk H
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Dec; 299():113606. PubMed ID: 34523540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Linking national wood consumption with global biodiversity and ecosystem service losses.
    Chaudhary A; Carrasco LR; Kastner T
    Sci Total Environ; 2017 May; 586():985-994. PubMed ID: 28222925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.