278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32510555)
1. Comprehensive fundamental somatic variant calling and quality management strategies for human cancer genomes.
He X; Chen S; Li R; Han X; He Z; Yuan D; Zhang S; Duan X; Niu B
Brief Bioinform; 2021 May; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 32510555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. NGS_SNPAnalyzer: a desktop software supporting genome projects by identifying and visualizing sequence variations from next-generation sequencing data.
Lee DJ; Kwon T; Kim CK; Seol YJ; Park DS; Lee TH; Ahn BO
Genes Genomics; 2020 Nov; 42(11):1311-1317. PubMed ID: 32980993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bioinformatic data processing pipelines in support of next-generation sequencing-based HIV drug resistance testing: the Winnipeg Consensus.
Ji H; Enns E; Brumme CJ; Parkin N; Howison M; Lee ER; Capina R; Marinier E; Avila-Rios S; Sandstrom P; Van Domselaar G; Harrigan R; Paredes R; Kantor R; Noguera-Julian M
J Int AIDS Soc; 2018 Oct; 21(10):e25193. PubMed ID: 30350345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variant callers for next-generation sequencing data: a comparison study.
Liu X; Han S; Wang Z; Gelernter J; Yang BZ
PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e75619. PubMed ID: 24086590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Systematic comparison of germline variant calling pipelines cross multiple next-generation sequencers.
Chen J; Li X; Zhong H; Meng Y; Du H
Sci Rep; 2019 Jun; 9(1):9345. PubMed ID: 31249349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. NGSpop: A desktop software that supports population studies by identifying sequence variations from next-generation sequencing data.
Lee DJ; Kwon T; Lee HJ; Oh YH; Kim JH; Lee TH
PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0260908. PubMed ID: 36395265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of sequencing data processing pipelines and application to underrepresented African human populations.
Breton G; Johansson ACV; Sjödin P; Schlebusch CM; Jakobsson M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Oct; 22(1):488. PubMed ID: 34627144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance evaluation of pipelines for mapping, variant calling and interval padding, for the analysis of NGS germline panels.
Zanti M; Michailidou K; Loizidou MA; Machattou C; Pirpa P; Christodoulou K; Spyrou GM; Kyriacou K; Hadjisavvas A
BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Apr; 22(1):218. PubMed ID: 33910496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of seven SNP calling pipelines for the next-generation sequencing data of chickens.
Liu J; Shen Q; Bao H
PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0262574. PubMed ID: 35100292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Somatic and Germline Variant Calling from Next-Generation Sequencing Data.
Chang TC; Xu K; Cheng Z; Wu G
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2022; 1361():37-54. PubMed ID: 35230682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. OVarFlow: a resource optimized GATK 4 based Open source Variant calling workFlow.
Bathke J; Lühken G
BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Aug; 22(1):402. PubMed ID: 34388963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Challenges in exome analysis by LifeScope and its alternative computational pipelines.
Pranckevičiene E; Rančelis T; Pranculis A; Kučinskas V
BMC Res Notes; 2015 Sep; 8():421. PubMed ID: 26346699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MutAid: Sanger and NGS Based Integrated Pipeline for Mutation Identification, Validation and Annotation in Human Molecular Genetics.
Pandey RV; Pabinger S; Kriegner A; Weinhäusel A
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0147697. PubMed ID: 26840129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A survey of tools for variant analysis of next-generation genome sequencing data.
Pabinger S; Dander A; Fischer M; Snajder R; Sperk M; Efremova M; Krabichler B; Speicher MR; Zschocke J; Trajanoski Z
Brief Bioinform; 2014 Mar; 15(2):256-78. PubMed ID: 23341494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. RNA-QC-chain: comprehensive and fast quality control for RNA-Seq data.
Zhou Q; Su X; Jing G; Chen S; Ning K
BMC Genomics; 2018 Feb; 19(1):144. PubMed ID: 29444661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Variant Review with the Integrative Genomics Viewer.
Robinson JT; Thorvaldsdóttir H; Wenger AM; Zehir A; Mesirov JP
Cancer Res; 2017 Nov; 77(21):e31-e34. PubMed ID: 29092934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. NGS for Sequence Variants.
Teng S
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 939():1-20. PubMed ID: 27807741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Best practices for variant calling in clinical sequencing.
Koboldt DC
Genome Med; 2020 Oct; 12(1):91. PubMed ID: 33106175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of post-alignment processing in variant discovery from whole exome data.
Tian S; Yan H; Kalmbach M; Slager SL
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):403. PubMed ID: 27716037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Halvade somatic: Somatic variant calling with Apache Spark.
Decap D; de Schaetzen van Brienen L; Larmuseau M; Costanza P; Herzeel C; Wuyts R; Marchal K; Fostier J
Gigascience; 2022 Jan; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 35022699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
