These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32510555)
21. Systematic benchmark of state-of-the-art variant calling pipelines identifies major factors affecting accuracy of coding sequence variant discovery. Barbitoff YA; Abasov R; Tvorogova VE; Glotov AS; Predeus AV BMC Genomics; 2022 Feb; 23(1):155. PubMed ID: 35193511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Validation and assessment of variant calling pipelines for next-generation sequencing. Pirooznia M; Kramer M; Parla J; Goes FS; Potash JB; McCombie WR; Zandi PP Hum Genomics; 2014 Jul; 8(1):14. PubMed ID: 25078893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Annotation of Variant Data from High-Throughput DNA Sequencing from Tumor Specimens: Filtering Strategies to Identify Driver Mutations. Sun S; Thorson JA; Murray SS Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1908():49-60. PubMed ID: 30649720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. SEQprocess: a modularized and customizable pipeline framework for NGS processing in R package. Joo T; Choi JH; Lee JH; Park SE; Jeon Y; Jung SH; Woo HG BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Feb; 20(1):90. PubMed ID: 30786880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Detection of oncogenic and clinically actionable mutations in cancer genomes critically depends on variant calling tools. Garcia-Prieto CA; Martínez-Jiménez F; Valencia A; Porta-Pardo E Bioinformatics; 2022 Jun; 38(12):3181-3191. PubMed ID: 35512388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. AMLVaran: a software approach to implement variant analysis of targeted NGS sequencing data in an oncological care setting. Wünsch C; Banck H; Müller-Tidow C; Dugas M BMC Med Genomics; 2020 Feb; 13(1):17. PubMed ID: 32019565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Review of alignment and SNP calling algorithms for next-generation sequencing data. Mielczarek M; Szyda J J Appl Genet; 2016 Feb; 57(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 26055432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Three-stage quality control strategies for DNA re-sequencing data. Guo Y; Ye F; Sheng Q; Clark T; Samuels DC Brief Bioinform; 2014 Nov; 15(6):879-89. PubMed ID: 24067931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. From Wet-Lab to Variations: Concordance and Speed of Bioinformatics Pipelines for Whole Genome and Whole Exome Sequencing. Laurie S; Fernandez-Callejo M; Marco-Sola S; Trotta JR; Camps J; Chacón A; Espinosa A; Gut M; Gut I; Heath S; Beltran S Hum Mutat; 2016 Dec; 37(12):1263-1271. PubMed ID: 27604516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A comprehensive quality control workflow for paired tumor-normal NGS experiments. Schroeder CM; Hilke FJ; Löffler MW; Bitzer M; Lenz F; Sturm M Bioinformatics; 2017 Jun; 33(11):1721-1722. PubMed ID: 28130233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. QC-Chain: fast and holistic quality control method for next-generation sequencing data. Zhou Q; Su X; Wang A; Xu J; Ning K PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e60234. PubMed ID: 23565205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. mInDel: a high-throughput and efficient pipeline for genome-wide InDel marker development. Lv Y; Liu Y; Zhao H BMC Genomics; 2016 Apr; 17():290. PubMed ID: 27079510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. CSN and CAVA: variant annotation tools for rapid, robust next-generation sequencing analysis in the clinical setting. Münz M; Ruark E; Renwick A; Ramsay E; Clarke M; Mahamdallie S; Cloke V; Seal S; Strydom A; Lunter G; Rahman N Genome Med; 2015 Jul; 7(1):76. PubMed ID: 26315209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of variant identification methods for whole genome sequencing data in dairy cattle. Baes CF; Dolezal MA; Koltes JE; Bapst B; Fritz-Waters E; Jansen S; Flury C; Signer-Hasler H; Stricker C; Fernando R; Fries R; Moll J; Garrick DJ; Reecy JM; Gredler B BMC Genomics; 2014 Nov; 15(1):948. PubMed ID: 25361890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. NGS-QC Generator: A Quality Control System for ChIP-Seq and Related Deep Sequencing-Generated Datasets. Mendoza-Parra MA; Saleem MA; Blum M; Cholley PE; Gronemeyer H Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1418():243-65. PubMed ID: 27008019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Accuracy and efficiency of germline variant calling pipelines for human genome data. Zhao S; Agafonov O; Azab A; Stokowy T; Hovig E Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):20222. PubMed ID: 33214604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Application of BIG-Annotator in the genome sequencing data functional annotation and genetic diagnosis]. Huang Y; Liu Q; Chi LJ; Shi CM; Wu Z; Hu M; Shi H; Chen H Yi Chuan; 2018 Nov; 40(11):1015-1023. PubMed ID: 30465534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]