These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32512413)

  • 1. Assessing the frequency of general fingerprint patterns by fingerprint examiners and novices.
    Mattijssen EJAT; Witteman CLM; Berger CEH; Stoel RD
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Aug; 313():110347. PubMed ID: 32512413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Finding the perfect match: Fingerprint expertise facilitates statistical learning and visual comparison decision-making.
    Growns B; Mattijssen EJAT; Salerno JM; Schweitzer NJ; Cole SA; Martire KA
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2023 Jun; 29(2):386-397. PubMed ID: 35404639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical feature training improves fingerprint-matching accuracy in novices and professional fingerprint examiners.
    Growns B; Towler A; Dunn JD; Salerno JM; Schweitzer NJ; Dror IE
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2022 Jul; 7(1):60. PubMed ID: 35841470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of fingerprint expertise on visual short-term memory.
    Corbett BJ; Tangen JM; Searston RA; Thompson MB
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2024 Mar; 9(1):14. PubMed ID: 38502299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Expertise with unfamiliar objects is flexible to changes in task but not changes in class.
    Searston RA; Tangen JM
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178403. PubMed ID: 28574998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measuring the rarity of core-delta distances in fingerprint patterns in the Dutch population.
    de Jongh A; Lubach AR; Lie Kwie SL; Loadsman-Wammes FDLV; Alberink I
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jan; 69(1):94-116. PubMed ID: 37723644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Expertise in fingerprint identification.
    Thompson MB; Tangen JM; McCarthy DJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Nov; 58(6):1519-30. PubMed ID: 23786258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring the Rarity of Fingerprint Patterns in the Dutch Population Using an Extended Classification Set.
    de Jongh A; Lubach AR; Lie Kwie SL; Alberink I
    J Forensic Sci; 2019 Jan; 64(1):108-119. PubMed ID: 29889979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Discrepancies in expert decision-making in forensic fingerprint examination.
    Mustonen V; Hakkarainen K; Tuunainen J; Pohjola P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Sep; 254():215-26. PubMed ID: 26254629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of cognitive bias, examiner expertise, and stimulus material on forensic evidence analysis.
    Pena MM; Stoiloff S; Sparacino M; Schreiber Compo N
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Sep; 69(5):1740-1757. PubMed ID: 38922874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Forensic feature-comparison expertise: Statistical learning facilitates visual comparison performance.
    Growns B; Martire KA
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Sep; 26(3):493-506. PubMed ID: 32150438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Buscaglia J; Roberts MA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 May; 108(19):7733-8. PubMed ID: 21518906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring what latent fingerprint examiners consider sufficient information for individualization determinations.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e110179. PubMed ID: 25372036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for configural processing in fingerprint experts.
    Busey TA; Vanderkolk JR
    Vision Res; 2005 Feb; 45(4):431-48. PubMed ID: 15610748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of expertise, target usefulness and image structure on visual search.
    Robson SG; Tangen JM; Searston RA
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Mar; 6(1):16. PubMed ID: 33709197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in latent fingerprint examiners' markup between analysis and comparison.
    Ulery BT; Hicklin RA; Roberts MA; Buscaglia J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2015 Feb; 247():54-61. PubMed ID: 25553355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Novices cannot fill the examiners' shoes: Evidence of footwear examiners' expertise in shoe comparisons.
    Chapman R; Summersby S; Lang T; Raymond J; Ballantyne K
    Sci Justice; 2023 Sep; 63(5):598-611. PubMed ID: 37718007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative assessment of evidential weight for a fingerprint comparison. Part II: a generalisation to take account of the general pattern.
    Neumann C; Evett IW; Skerrett JE; Mateos-Garcia I
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jan; 214(1-3):195-9. PubMed ID: 21885220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of proficiency testing information and error aversions on the weight given to fingerprint evidence.
    Mitchell G; Garrett BL
    Behav Sci Law; 2019 Mar; 37(2):195-210. PubMed ID: 30883891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Forensic comparison and matching of fingerprints: using quantitative image measures for estimating error rates through understanding and predicting difficulty.
    Kellman PJ; Mnookin JL; Erlikhman G; Garrigan P; Ghose T; Mettler E; Charlton D; Dror IE
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e94617. PubMed ID: 24788812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.