These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32514643)

  • 1. Which multi-attribute utility instruments are recommended for use in cost-utility analysis? A review of national health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines.
    Kennedy-Martin M; Slaap B; Herdman M; van Reenen M; Kennedy-Martin T; Greiner W; Busschbach J; Boye KS
    Eur J Health Econ; 2020 Nov; 21(8):1245-1257. PubMed ID: 32514643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Head-to-Head Comparison of the EQ-5D-5L and AQoL-8D Multi-Attribute Utility Instruments in Patients Who Have Previously Undergone Bariatric Surgery.
    Campbell JA; Palmer AJ; Venn A; Sharman M; Otahal P; Neil A
    Patient; 2016 Aug; 9(4):311-22. PubMed ID: 26841910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic Review of the Psychometric Performance of Generic Childhood Multi-attribute Utility Instruments.
    Kwon J; Smith S; Raghunandan R; Howell M; Huynh E; Kim S; Bentley T; Roberts N; Lancsar E; Howard K; Wong G; Craig J; Petrou S
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2023 Jul; 21(4):559-584. PubMed ID: 37133712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating the disutility of relapse in relapsing-remitting and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis using the EQ-5D-5L, AQoL-8D, EQ-5D-5L-psychosocial, and SF-6D: implications for health economic evaluation models.
    Ahmad H; Campbell JA; van der Mei I; Taylor BV; Xia Q; Zhao T; Palmer AJ
    Qual Life Res; 2023 Dec; 32(12):3373-3387. PubMed ID: 37522942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the EQ-5D 3L and the SF-6D (SF-36) contemporaneous utility scores in patients with chronic kidney disease in Sri Lanka: a cross-sectional survey.
    Kularatna S; Senanayake S; Gunawardena N; Graves N
    BMJ Open; 2019 Feb; 9(2):e024854. PubMed ID: 30772857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the EQ-5D-3L and the SF-6D (SF-12) contemporaneous utility scores in patients with cardiovascular disease.
    Kularatna S; Byrnes J; Chan YK; Ski CF; Carrington M; Thompson D; Stewart S; Scuffham PA
    Qual Life Res; 2017 Dec; 26(12):3399-3408. PubMed ID: 28766084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring the Sensitivity and Construct Validity of 6 Utility Instruments in 7 Disease Areas.
    Richardson J; Iezzi A; Khan MA; Chen G; Maxwell A
    Med Decis Making; 2016 Feb; 36(2):147-59. PubMed ID: 26582319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Review of the Development and Application of Generic Multi-Attribute Utility Instruments for Paediatric Populations.
    Chen G; Ratcliffe J
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2015 Oct; 33(10):1013-28. PubMed ID: 25985933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing Outcomes for Cost-Utility Analysis in Children and Adolescents With Mental Health Problems: Are Multiattribute Utility Instruments Fit for Purpose?
    Mihalopoulos C; Chen G; Scott JG; Bucholc J; Allen C; Coghill D; Jenkins P; Norman R; Ratcliffe J; Richardson J; Stathis S; Viney R
    Value Health; 2023 May; 26(5):733-741. PubMed ID: 36535579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing and explaining differences in the magnitude, content, and sensitivity of utilities predicted by the EQ-5D, SF-6D, HUI 3, 15D, QWB, and AQoL-8D multiattribute utility instruments.
    Richardson J; Khan MA; Iezzi A; Maxwell A
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Apr; 35(3):276-91. PubMed ID: 25159172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An Exploratory Study: A Head-to-Head Comparison of the EQ-5D-5L and AQoL-8D for Long-Term Publicly Waitlisted Bariatric Surgery Patients Before and 3 Months After Bariatric Surgery.
    Campbell JA; Hensher M; Neil A; Venn A; Otahal P; Wilkinson S; Palmer AJ
    Pharmacoecon Open; 2018 Dec; 2(4):443-458. PubMed ID: 29623636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing multi-attribute utility instruments: CP-6D, a Cerebral palsy specific instrument, vs AQoL-4D.
    Bahrampour M; Downes M; Scuffham PA; Byrnes J
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2022 Mar; 22(2):217-224. PubMed ID: 33779449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A systematic literature review of health state utility values in head and neck cancer.
    Meregaglia M; Cairns J
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Sep; 15(1):174. PubMed ID: 28865475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing outcomes for cost-utility analysis in depression: comparison of five multi-attribute utility instruments with two depression-specific outcome measures.
    Mihalopoulos C; Chen G; Iezzi A; Khan MA; Richardson J
    Br J Psychiatry; 2014 Nov; 205(5):390-7. PubMed ID: 25257063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of depression on health-related quality of life and wellbeing: identifying important dimensions and assessing their inclusion in multi-attribute utility instruments.
    Engel L; Chen G; Richardson J; Mihalopoulos C
    Qual Life Res; 2018 Nov; 27(11):2873-2884. PubMed ID: 30006664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can multi-attribute utility instruments adequately account for subjective well-being?
    Richardson J; Chen G; Khan MA; Iezzi A
    Med Decis Making; 2015 Apr; 35(3):292-304. PubMed ID: 25623064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A review of preference-based health-related quality of life questionnaires in spinal cord injury research.
    Whitehurst DG; Noonan VK; Dvorak MF; Bryan S
    Spinal Cord; 2012 Sep; 50(9):646-54. PubMed ID: 22641255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Review of the Methods Used to Generate Utility Values in NICE Technology Assessments for Children and Adolescents.
    Hill H; Rowen D; Pennington B; Wong R; Wailoo A
    Value Health; 2020 Jul; 23(7):907-917. PubMed ID: 32762993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of utility measurement using EQ-5D and SF-6D preference-based generic instruments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
    Salaffi F; Carotti M; Ciapetti A; Gasparini S; Grassi W
    Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2011; 29(4):661-71. PubMed ID: 21813061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mapping the Functional Independence Measure to a multi-attribute utility instrument for economic evaluations in rehabilitation: a secondary analysis of randomized controlled trial data.
    Peiris CL; Taylor NF; Watts JJ; Shields N; Brusco NK; Mortimer D
    Disabil Rehabil; 2020 Oct; 42(21):3024-3032. PubMed ID: 30907143
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.