120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32515341)
1. [Life-threatening illness and the decision to resuscitate or not].
Neergaard MA; Høst DL; Helledie E; Jespersen BA; Nielsen MK
Ugeskr Laeger; 2020 Jun; 182(23):. PubMed ID: 32515341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Advance directives for seriously ill hospitalized patients: effectiveness with the patient self-determination act and the SUPPORT intervention. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.
Teno J; Lynn J; Wenger N; Phillips RS; Murphy DP; Connors AF; Desbiens N; Fulkerson W; Bellamy P; Knaus WA
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1997 Apr; 45(4):500-7. PubMed ID: 9100721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preferences for cardiopulmonary resuscitation: physician-patient agreement and hospital resource use. The SUPPORT Investigators.
Teno JM; Hakim RB; Knaus WA; Wenger NS; Phillips RS; Wu AW; Layde P; Connors AF; Dawson NV; Lynn J
J Gen Intern Med; 1995 Apr; 10(4):179-86. PubMed ID: 7790978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient preferences for communication with physicians about end-of-life decisions. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preference for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.
Hofmann JC; Wenger NS; Davis RB; Teno J; Connors AF; Desbiens N; Lynn J; Phillips RS
Ann Intern Med; 1997 Jul; 127(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 9214246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The study to understand prognoses and preferences for outcomes and risks of treatments (SUPPORT). The SUPPORT Principal Investigators.
JAMA; 1995 Nov 22-29; 274(20):1591-8. PubMed ID: 7474243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of institutional culture and policies on do-not-resuscitate decision making at the end of life.
Dzeng E; Colaianni A; Roland M; Chander G; Smith TJ; Kelly MP; Barclay S; Levine D
JAMA Intern Med; 2015 May; 175(5):812-9. PubMed ID: 25845020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective study of patient-physician communication about resuscitation.
Golin CE; Wenger NS; Liu H; Dawson NV; Teno JM; Desbiens NA; Lynn J; Oye RK; Phillips RS
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2000 May; 48(S1):S52-60. PubMed ID: 10809457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes, preferences for resuscitation, and physician-patient communication among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.
Haidet P; Hamel MB; Davis RB; Wenger N; Reding D; Kussin PS; Connors AF; Lynn J; Weeks JC; Phillips RS
Am J Med; 1998 Sep; 105(3):222-9. PubMed ID: 9753025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Attitudes and beliefs of palliative care physicians regarding communication with terminally ill cancer patients.
Bruera E; Neumann CM; Mazzocato C; Stiefel F; Sala R
Palliat Med; 2000 Jul; 14(4):287-98. PubMed ID: 10974980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The do-not-resuscitate order: outpatient experience and decision-making preferences.
Ebell MH; Smith MA; Seifert KG; Polsinelli K
J Fam Pract; 1990 Dec; 31(6):630-4; discussion 635-6. PubMed ID: 2246638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethical issues in geriatrics: a guide for clinicians.
Mueller PS; Hook CC; Fleming KC
Mayo Clin Proc; 2004 Apr; 79(4):554-62. PubMed ID: 15065621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Do-not-resuscitate orders--ethical and legal considerations].
Ballin NH
Ugeskr Laeger; 2007 Mar; 169(13):1201-4. PubMed ID: 17425922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The association between religiosity and resuscitation status preference among patients with advanced cancer.
Delgado-Guay MO; Chisholm G; Williams J; Bruera E
Palliat Support Care; 2015 Oct; 13(5):1435-9. PubMed ID: 25739871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Physician understanding of patient resuscitation preferences: insights and clinical implications.
Wenger NS; Phillips RS; Teno JM; Oye RK; Dawson NV; Liu H; Califf R; Layde P; Hakim R; Lynn J
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2000 May; 48(S1):S44-51. PubMed ID: 10809456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Discussing the resuscitation policy at a geriatric ward: the experience of patients or their representatives].
Bressers JP; Algra A; Dautzenberg PL; van Delden JJ
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr; 2011 Dec; 42(6):256-62. PubMed ID: 22250368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Communication and decision making about life-sustaining treatment: examining the experiences of resident physicians and seriously-ill hospitalized patients.
Deep KS; Griffith CH; Wilson JF
J Gen Intern Med; 2008 Nov; 23(11):1877-82. PubMed ID: 18800206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Decision to resuscitate or not in patients with chronic diseases.
Saltbaek L; Tvedegaard E
Dan Med J; 2012 Jan; 59(1):A4353. PubMed ID: 22239838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. CEASE: a guide for clinicians on how to stop resuscitation efforts.
Torke AM; Bledsoe P; Wocial LD; Bosslet GT; Helft PR
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2015 Mar; 12(3):440-5. PubMed ID: 25664817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cancer patients, physicians, and nurses differ in their attitudes toward the decisional role in do-not-resuscitate decision-making.
Saltbæk L; Michelsen HM; Nelausen KM; Theile S; Dehlendorff C; Dalton SO; Nielsen DL
Support Care Cancer; 2020 Dec; 28(12):6057-6066. PubMed ID: 32291599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Associations with resuscitation choice: Do not resuscitate, full code or undecided.
Jordan K; Elliott JO; Wall S; Saul E; Sheth R; Coffman J
Patient Educ Couns; 2016 May; 99(5):823-9. PubMed ID: 26673106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
