These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Event-related potentials in a visual discrimination task: negative waves related to detection and attention. Czigler I; Csibra G Psychophysiology; 1990 Nov; 27(6):669-76. PubMed ID: 2100352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of attention and stimulus probability on ERPs in a Go/Nogo task. Eimer M Biol Psychol; 1993 Apr; 35(2):123-38. PubMed ID: 8507742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Discrimination of emotional facial expressions in a visual oddball task: an ERP study. Campanella S; Gaspard C; Debatisse D; Bruyer R; Crommelinck M; Guerit JM Biol Psychol; 2002 May; 59(3):171-86. PubMed ID: 12009560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The relationship between N2 and N400: scalp distribution, stimulus probability, and task relevance. Deacon D; Breton F; Ritter W; Vaughan HG Psychophysiology; 1991 Mar; 28(2):185-200. PubMed ID: 1946885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Multivariate analyses of relations between psychological parameters and changes in cerebral electric arousal activity within the scope of visual search processes]. Zeller G Z Psychol Z Angew Psychol; 1986; 194(1):39-61. PubMed ID: 2874671 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Aging, stimulus identification and the effect of probability: an event-related potential study. Czigler I; Csibra G; Ambró A Biol Psychol; 1996 Mar; 43(1):27-40. PubMed ID: 8739612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An electrophysiological index of stimulus unfamiliarity. Daffner KR; Mesulam MM; Scinto LF; Calvo V; Faust R; Holcomb PJ Psychophysiology; 2000 Nov; 37(6):737-47. PubMed ID: 11117454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. Luck SJ; Hillyard SA Psychophysiology; 1994 May; 31(3):291-308. PubMed ID: 8008793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of graduated processing difficulty on P 300 component of the event-related brain potential. Neumann U; Ullsperger P; Gille HG; Pietschmann M; Erdmann U Z Psychol Z Angew Psychol; 1986; 194(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 2874670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Event-related potentials and the semantic matching of faces. Barrett SE; Rugg MD Neuropsychologia; 1989; 27(7):913-22. PubMed ID: 2771030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Parietal P3 response as an indicator of stimulus categorization: increased P3 amplitude to categorically deviant target and nontarget stimuli. Nasman VT; Rosenfeld JP Psychophysiology; 1990 May; 27(3):338-50. PubMed ID: 2236436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Category scaling of the interest value of complex visual stimuli and late positive components of the evoked potential. Hömberg V; Grünewald G; Netz J Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1984; 425():216-22. PubMed ID: 6588834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Stimulus deviance and evoked potentials. Näätänen R; Simpson M; Loveless NE Biol Psychol; 1982; 14(1-2):53-98. PubMed ID: 7104425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of small variation of the frequent auditory stimulus on the event-related brain potential to the infrequent stimulus. Winkler I; Paavilainen P; Alho K; Reinikainen K; Sams M; Näätänen R Psychophysiology; 1990 Mar; 27(2):228-35. PubMed ID: 2247552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The P300 amplitude of the event-related brain potential indicates changes within a frame-of-reference. Junghanns G; Ullsperger P Z Psychol Z Angew Psychol; 1989; 197(4):387-94. PubMed ID: 2576696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Event-related potentials and the matching of familiar and unfamiliar faces. Barrett SE; Rugg MD; Perrett DI Neuropsychologia; 1988; 26(1):105-17. PubMed ID: 3362336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]