These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32516081)

  • 1. Transparency and Reproducibility of Meta-Analyses in Psychology: A Meta-Review.
    Polanin JR; Hennessy EA; Tsuji S
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2020 Jul; 15(4):1026-1041. PubMed ID: 32516081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A meta-review of transparency and reproducibility-related reporting practices in published meta-analyses on clinical psychological interventions (2000-2020).
    López-Nicolás R; López-López JA; Rubio-Aparicio M; Sánchez-Meca J
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Feb; 54(1):334-349. PubMed ID: 34173943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do oncology researchers adhere to reproducible and transparent principles? A cross-sectional survey of published oncology literature.
    Walters C; Harter ZJ; Wayant C; Vo N; Warren M; Chronister J; Tritz D; Vassar M
    BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e033962. PubMed ID: 31892667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do Meta-Analyses of Intervention/Prevention Programs in the Field of Criminology Meet the Tests of Transparency and Reproducibility?
    Wong JS; Bouchard J
    Trauma Violence Abuse; 2023 Jul; 24(3):1522-1542. PubMed ID: 35239446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving transparency and scientific rigor in academic publishing.
    Prager EM; Chambers KE; Plotkin JL; McArthur DL; Bandrowski AE; Bansal N; Martone ME; Bergstrom HC; Bespalov A; Graf C
    J Neurosci Res; 2019 Apr; 97(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 30506706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reproducibility of individual effect sizes in meta-analyses in psychology.
    Maassen E; van Assen MALM; Nuijten MB; Olsson-Collentine A; Wicherts JM
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233107. PubMed ID: 32459806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.
    Aromataris E; Fernandez R; Godfrey CM; Holly C; Khalil H; Tungpunkom P
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):132-40. PubMed ID: 26360830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: when they are useful and when to be careful.
    Noordzij M; Hooft L; Dekker FW; Zoccali C; Jager KJ
    Kidney Int; 2009 Dec; 76(11):1130-6. PubMed ID: 19727062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Instructions for aggregated evidence: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses (part 1)].
    Schindler B; Briel M; Günther J
    Med Monatsschr Pharm; 2015 Sep; 38(9):350-7. PubMed ID: 26731853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Meta-analysis is not an exact science: Call for guidance on quantitative synthesis decisions.
    Haddaway NR; Rytwinski T
    Environ Int; 2018 May; 114():357-359. PubMed ID: 29482849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The transparency and reproducibility of systematic reviews in forensic science.
    Chin JM; Growns B; Sebastian J; Page MJ; Nakagawa S
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Nov; 340():111472. PubMed ID: 36179444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research.
    Stanley TD; Carter EC; Doucouliagos H
    Psychol Bull; 2018 Dec; 144(12):1325-1346. PubMed ID: 30321017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of reproducible and transparent research practices in pulmonology.
    Smith CA; Nolan J; Tritz DJ; Heavener TE; Pelton J; Cook K; Vassar M
    Pulmonology; 2021; 27(2):134-143. PubMed ID: 32739326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reporting quality of search methods in systematic reviews of HIV behavioral interventions (2000-2010): are the searches clearly explained, systematic and reproducible?
    Mullins MM; DeLuca JB; Crepaz N; Lyles CM
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Jun; 5(2):116-30. PubMed ID: 26052651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Compliance of systematic reviews in veterinary journals with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) literature search reporting guidelines.
    Toews LC
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2017 Jul; 105(3):233-239. PubMed ID: 28670210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving the transparency of meta-analyses with interactive web applications.
    Ahern TP; MacLehose RF; Haines L; Cronin-Fenton DP; Damkier P; Collin LJ; Lash TL
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2021 Dec; 26(6):327-332. PubMed ID: 32220861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Toward a more transparent, rigorous, and generative psychology.
    Johnson BT
    Psychol Bull; 2021 Jan; 147(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 33464105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproducible research practices and transparency in reproductive endocrinology and infertility articles.
    Kemper JM; Rolnik DL; Mol BWJ; Ioannidis JPA
    Fertil Steril; 2020 Dec; 114(6):1322-1329. PubMed ID: 32771255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.