These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32516081)

  • 21. Raw data were not disclosed in 95% of PubMed-indexed heart failure meta-analyses in 2021: A systematic analysis of transparency.
    Karakitsos P; Mylonas KS
    Int J Cardiol; 2024 Jun; 405():131987. PubMed ID: 38513735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Transparent and Reproducible Research Practices in the Surgical Literature.
    Hughes BT; Niemann A; Tritz D; Boyer K; Robbins H; Vassar M
    J Surg Res; 2022 Jun; 274():116-124. PubMed ID: 35150944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Errors in the conduct of systematic reviews of pharmacological interventions for irritable bowel syndrome.
    Ford AC; Guyatt GH; Talley NJ; Moayyedi P
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Feb; 105(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 19920807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy could not be reproduced.
    Stegeman I; Leeflang MMG
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Nov; 127():161-166. PubMed ID: 32679314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature.
    Iqbal SA; Wallach JD; Khoury MJ; Schully SD; Ioannidis JP
    PLoS Biol; 2016 Jan; 14(1):e1002333. PubMed ID: 26726926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The new statistics: why and how.
    Cumming G
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Jan; 25(1):7-29. PubMed ID: 24220629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Rapid evidence assessment: increasing the transparency of an emerging methodology.
    Varker T; Forbes D; Dell L; Weston A; Merlin T; Hodson S; O'Donnell M
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2015 Dec; 21(6):1199-204. PubMed ID: 26123092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Systematic review and meta-analysis methodology.
    Crowther M; Lim W; Crowther MA
    Blood; 2010 Oct; 116(17):3140-6. PubMed ID: 20656933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reproducibility of literature search reporting in medical education reviews.
    Maggio LA; Tannery NH; Kanter SL
    Acad Med; 2011 Aug; 86(8):1049-54. PubMed ID: 21694568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Randomized Trials, Meta-Analyses, and Systematic Reviews: Using Examples from Rheumatology.
    Pope JE; Hazlewood GS
    Rheum Dis Clin North Am; 2018 May; 44(2):295-305. PubMed ID: 29622296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Eligibility criteria in systematic reviews published in prominent medical journals: a methodological review.
    McCrae N; Purssell E
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2015 Dec; 21(6):1052-8. PubMed ID: 26370723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Making Research Evaluation More Transparent: Aligning Research Philosophy, Institutional Values, and Reporting.
    Dougherty MR; Slevc LR; Grand JA
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2019 May; 14(3):361-375. PubMed ID: 30629888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reporting and Reproducibility of Meta-Analysis in Speech, Language, and Hearing Research.
    Chow JC; Sjogren AL; Zhao H
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Jul; 64(7):2786-2793. PubMed ID: 34232697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An assessment of transparency and reproducibility-related research practices in otolaryngology.
    Johnson AL; Torgerson T; Skinner M; Hamilton T; Tritz D; Vassar M
    Laryngoscope; 2020 Aug; 130(8):1894-1901. PubMed ID: 31593300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reproducible and transparent research practices in published neurology research.
    Rauh S; Torgerson T; Johnson AL; Pollard J; Tritz D; Vassar M
    Res Integr Peer Rev; 2020; 5():5. PubMed ID: 32161667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Estimating the Prevalence of Transparency and Reproducibility-Related Research Practices in Psychology (2014-2017).
    Hardwicke TE; Thibault RT; Kosie JE; Wallach JD; Kidwell MC; Ioannidis JPA
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2022 Jan; 17(1):239-251. PubMed ID: 33682488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Synthesising conceptual frameworks for patient and public involvement in research - a critical appraisal of a meta-narrative review.
    Evans D; Hopewell-Kelly N; Kok M; White J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):116. PubMed ID: 30359226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in vascular surgery needs improvement: a systematic review.
    Tan WK; Wigley J; Shantikumar S
    Int J Surg; 2014 Dec; 12(12):1262-5. PubMed ID: 25448643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fixed- versus random-effects models in meta-analysis: model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results.
    Schmidt FL; Oh IS; Hayes TL
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):97-128. PubMed ID: 18001516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Graphical Descriptives: A Way to Improve Data Transparency and Methodological Rigor in Psychology.
    Tay L; Parrigon S; Huang Q; LeBreton JM
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2016 Sep; 11(5):692-701. PubMed ID: 27694464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.