These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32516407)

  • 1. Relationship of Contrast Sensitivity Measured Using Quick Contrast Sensitivity Function With Other Visual Functions in a Low Vision Population.
    Stalin A; Dalton K
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2020 Jun; 61(6):21. PubMed ID: 32516407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting individual contrast sensitivity functions from acuity and letter contrast sensitivity measurements.
    Thurman SM; Davey PG; McCray KL; Paronian V; Seitz AR
    J Vis; 2016 Dec; 16(15):15. PubMed ID: 28006065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of contrast sensitivity and sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP) acuity estimates in normal humans.
    Ridder WH
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 139(3):207-219. PubMed ID: 31414313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing the Shape of Contrast Sensitivity Functions for Normal and Low Vision.
    Chung ST; Legge GE
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Jan; 57(1):198-207. PubMed ID: 26795826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quick contrast sensitivity measurements in the periphery.
    Rosén R; Lundström L; Venkataraman AP; Winter S; Unsbo P
    J Vis; 2014 Jul; 14(8):3. PubMed ID: 24993017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual impairment and the useful field of vision.
    Leat SJ; Lovie-Kitchin J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Jul; 26(4):392-403. PubMed ID: 16792739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Global motion perception is independent from contrast sensitivity for coherent motion direction discrimination and visual acuity in 4.5-year-old children.
    Chakraborty A; Anstice NS; Jacobs RJ; Paudel N; LaGasse LL; Lester BM; Wouldes TA; Harding JE; Thompson B
    Vision Res; 2015 Oct; 115(Pt A):83-91. PubMed ID: 26318529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contrast Sensitivity in Eyes with Central Scotoma: Effect of Stimulus Drift.
    Lewis P; Venkataraman AP; Lundström L
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Apr; 95(4):354-361. PubMed ID: 29561506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Towards a classification of visual impairment.
    van der Wildt GJ; Kooijman AC; Dumbar G; Cornelissen FW
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1992; 82(1-2):33-41. PubMed ID: 1305025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peripheral vision of youths with low vision: motion perception, crowding, and visual search.
    Tadin D; Nyquist JB; Lusk KE; Corn AL; Lappin JS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Aug; 53(9):5860-8. PubMed ID: 22836766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Grating acuity and contrast tests for clinical trials of severe vision loss.
    Bittner AK; Jeter P; Dagnelie G
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Oct; 88(10):1153-63. PubMed ID: 21747309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of Melbourne Edge Test contrast sensitivity measures in the visually impaired.
    Wolffsohn JS; Eperjesi F; Napper G
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Jul; 25(4):371-4. PubMed ID: 15953123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensitivity and Stability of Functional Vision Tests in Detecting Subtle Changes Under Multiple Simulated Conditions.
    Chen Z; Zhuang Y; Xu Z; Chan LYL; Zhang S; Ye Q; Feng L; Lu ZL; Li J
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2021 Jun; 10(7):7. PubMed ID: 34100925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measuring Contrast Sensitivity in Specific Areas of Vision - A Meaningful Way to Assess Quality of Life and Ability to Perform Daily Activities in Glaucoma.
    Eshraghi H; Sanvicente CT; Gogte P; Waisbourd M; Lee D; Manzi RRS; Leiby BE; Richman J; Wizov SS; Spaeth GL
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2019 Oct; 26(5):301-310. PubMed ID: 31116620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of contrast sensitivity in patients with advanced glaucoma: comparison of two tests.
    Jammal AA; Ferreira BG; Zangalli CS; Vianna JR; Thompson AC; Artes PH; Costa VP; Reis ASC
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Oct; 104(10):1418-1422. PubMed ID: 31974085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Objective and quantitative assessment of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity based on steady-state motion visual evoked potentials using concentric-ring paradigm.
    Zheng X; Xu G; Wang Y; Han C; Du C; Yan W; Zhang S; Liang R
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2019 Oct; 139(2):123-136. PubMed ID: 31214918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability and consistency of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity measures in advanced eye disease.
    Kiser AK; Mladenovich D; Eshraghi F; Bourdeau D; Dagnelie G
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Nov; 82(11):946-54. PubMed ID: 16317369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contrast sensitivity measured by two different test methods in healthy, young adults with normal visual acuity.
    Koefoed VF; Baste V; Roumes C; Høvding G
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2015 Mar; 93(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 25056525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Ohio Contrast Cards: Visual Performance in a Pediatric Low-vision Site.
    Hopkins GR; Dougherty BE; Brown AM
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Oct; 94(10):946-956. PubMed ID: 28972542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Self-reported importance and difficulty of driving in a low-vision clinic population.
    Massof RW; Deremeik JT; Park WL; Grover LL
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Nov; 48(11):4955-62. PubMed ID: 17962445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.