These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32516761)

  • 21. Quantitative comparison of closed-loop and dual harmonic Kelvin probe force microscopy techniques.
    Kilpatrick JI; Collins L; Weber SAL; Rodriguez BJ
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2018 Dec; 89(12):123708. PubMed ID: 30599628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Surface potential imaging with atomic resolution by frequency-modulation Kelvin probe force microscopy without bias voltage feedback.
    Kou L; Ma Z; Li YJ; Naitoh Y; Komiyama M; Sugawara Y
    Nanotechnology; 2015 May; 26(19):195701. PubMed ID: 25895740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Preventing probe induced topography correlated artifacts in Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy.
    Polak L; Wijngaarden RJ
    Ultramicroscopy; 2016 Dec; 171():158-165. PubMed ID: 27690346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Breaking the Time Barrier in Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy: Fast Free Force Reconstruction Using the G-Mode Platform.
    Collins L; Ahmadi M; Wu T; Hu B; Kalinin SV; Jesse S
    ACS Nano; 2017 Sep; 11(9):8717-8729. PubMed ID: 28780850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Multiparametric Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy for the Simultaneous Mapping of Surface Potential and Nanomechanical Properties.
    Xie H; Zhang H; Hussain D; Meng X; Song J; Sun L
    Langmuir; 2017 Mar; 33(11):2725-2733. PubMed ID: 28263608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A simple KPFM-based approach for electrostatic- free topographic measurements: the case of MoS
    Arrighi A; Ullberg N; Derycke V; Grévin B
    Nanotechnology; 2023 Mar; 34(21):. PubMed ID: 36812541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The importance of cantilever dynamics in the interpretation of Kelvin probe force microscopy.
    Satzinger KJ; Brown KA; Westervelt RM
    J Appl Phys; 2012 Sep; 112(6):64510. PubMed ID: 23093809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. High spatial resolution Kelvin probe force microscopy with coaxial probes.
    Brown KA; Satzinger KJ; Westervelt RM
    Nanotechnology; 2012 Mar; 23(11):115703. PubMed ID: 22369870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Kelvin probe force microscopy for local characterisation of active nanoelectronic devices.
    Wagner T; Beyer H; Reissner P; Mensch P; Riel H; Gotsmann B; Stemmer A
    Beilstein J Nanotechnol; 2015; 6():2193-206. PubMed ID: 26734511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pulsed Force Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy through Integration of Lock-In Detection.
    Zahmatkeshsaredorahi A; Jakob DS; Fang H; Fakhraai Z; Xu XG
    Nano Lett; 2023 Oct; 23(19):8953-8959. PubMed ID: 37737103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Unraveling Spatiotemporal Transient Dynamics at the Nanoscale via Wavelet Transform-Based Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy.
    Biglarbeigi P; Morelli A; Pauly S; Yu Z; Jiang W; Sharma S; Finlay D; Kumar A; Soin N; Payam AF
    ACS Nano; 2023 Nov; 17(21):21506-21517. PubMed ID: 37877266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Multifrequency spectrum analysis using fully digital G Mode-Kelvin probe force microscopy.
    Collins L; Belianinov A; Somnath S; Rodriguez BJ; Balke N; Kalinin SV; Jesse S
    Nanotechnology; 2016 Mar; 27(10):105706. PubMed ID: 26866505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Kelvin probe force microscopy in liquid using electrochemical force microscopy.
    Collins L; Jesse S; Kilpatrick JI; Tselev A; Okatan MB; Kalinin SV; Rodriguez BJ
    Beilstein J Nanotechnol; 2015; 6():201-14. PubMed ID: 25671164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fast, high-resolution surface potential measurements in air with heterodyne Kelvin probe force microscopy.
    Garrett JL; Munday JN
    Nanotechnology; 2016 Jun; 27(24):245705. PubMed ID: 27159082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Artifacts in time-resolved Kelvin probe force microscopy.
    Sadewasser S; Nicoara N; Solares SD
    Beilstein J Nanotechnol; 2018; 9():1272-1281. PubMed ID: 29765805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Excluding Contact Electrification in Surface Potential Measurement Using Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy.
    Li S; Zhou Y; Zi Y; Zhang G; Wang ZL
    ACS Nano; 2016 Feb; 10(2):2528-35. PubMed ID: 26824304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Note: switching crosstalk on and off in Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy.
    Polak L; de Man S; Wijngaarden RJ
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2014 Apr; 85(4):046111. PubMed ID: 24784689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. High-low Kelvin probe force spectroscopy for measuring the interface state density.
    Izumi R; Miyazaki M; Li YJ; Sugawara Y
    Beilstein J Nanotechnol; 2023; 14():175-189. PubMed ID: 36761682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of patch potentials in Casimir force measurements determined by heterodyne Kelvin probe force microscopy.
    Garrett JL; Somers D; Munday JN
    J Phys Condens Matter; 2015 Jun; 27(21):214012. PubMed ID: 25964997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quantitative characterization of built-in potential profile across GaAs p-n junctions using Kelvin probe force microscopy with qPlus sensor AFM.
    Ishida N; Mano T
    Nanotechnology; 2023 Nov; 35(6):. PubMed ID: 37944481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.