193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32517497)
1. Icare versus Goldmann in a randomised middle-aged population : The influence of central corneal thickness and refractive errors.
Stoor K; Karvonen E; Ohtonen P; Liinamaa MJ; Saarela V
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 May; 31(3):1231-1239. PubMed ID: 32517497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement between rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients.
Vincent SJ; Vincent RA; Shields D; Lee GA
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012; 40(4):e163-70. PubMed ID: 21883774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare
Valero B; Fénolland JR; Rosenberg R; Sendon D; Mesnard C; Sigaux M; Giraud JM; Renard JP
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Dec; 40(10):865-875. PubMed ID: 29174296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the new rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in a clinical setting.
Kim KN; Jeoung JW; Park KH; Yang MK; Kim DM
Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 91(5):e392-6. PubMed ID: 23521889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Goldmann applanation tonometer versus ocular response analyzer for measuring intraocular pressure after congenital cataract surgery.
Feizi S; Faramarzi A; Kheiri B
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 28(5):582-589. PubMed ID: 30246567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group.
Chen M; Zhang L; Xu J; Chen X; Gu Y; Ren Y; Wang K
BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):225. PubMed ID: 31726999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Self-measurement with Icare HOME tonometer, patients' feasibility and acceptability.
Cvenkel B; Velkovska MA; Jordanova VD
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2020 Mar; 30(2):258-263. PubMed ID: 30632407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements obtained by icare pro tonometer, non-contact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in healthy individuals.
Duran M
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2023 Dec; 46(10):1195-1203. PubMed ID: 37666735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Icare-Pro Rebound Tonometer Versus the Hand-held Applanation Tonometer in Congenital Glaucoma.
Borrego Sanz L; Morales-Fernandez L; Martínez de-la-Casa JM; Sáenz-Francés F; Fuentes M; García-Feijóo J
J Glaucoma; 2016 Feb; 25(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 25333612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of corneal parameters on measurements using the pulsatile ocular blood flow tonograph and Goldmann applanation tonometer.
Gunvant P; Baskaran M; Vijaya L; Joseph IS; Watkins RJ; Nallapothula M; Broadway DC; O'Leary DJ
Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Apr; 88(4):518-22. PubMed ID: 15031169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Agreement among Goldmann applanation tonometer, iCare, and Icare PRO rebound tonometers; non-contact tonometer; and Tonopen XL in healthy elderly subjects.
Kato Y; Nakakura S; Matsuo N; Yoshitomi K; Handa M; Tabuchi H; Kiuchi Y
Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Apr; 38(2):687-696. PubMed ID: 28393323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Icare-Pro Rebound Tonometer Versus Hand-held Applanation Tonometer for Pediatric Screening.
Arribas-Pardo P; Mendez-Hernández C; Valls-Ferran I; Puertas-Bordallo D
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2018 Nov; 55(6):382-386. PubMed ID: 30074606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Meta-analysis of the concordance of Icare
Rödter TH; Knippschild S; Baulig C; Krummenauer F
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2020 Mar; 30(2):245-252. PubMed ID: 31466475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the Intraocular Pressure Measured Using the New Rebound Tonometer Icare ic100 and Icare TA01i or Goldmann Applanation Tonometer.
Nakakura S; Mori E; Fujio Y; Fujisawa Y; Matsuya K; Kobayashi Y; Tabuchi H; Asaoka R; Kiuchi Y
J Glaucoma; 2019 Feb; 28(2):172-177. PubMed ID: 30689609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intraocular pressure measurement-comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry.
Schneider E; Grehn F
J Glaucoma; 2006 Feb; 15(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 16378009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The iCare rebound tonometer: comparisons with Goldmann tonometry, and influence of central corneal thickness.
Poostchi A; Mitchell R; Nicholas S; Purdie G; Wells A
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2009 Sep; 37(7):687-91. PubMed ID: 19788665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers.
Nakamura M; Darhad U; Tatsumi Y; Fujioka M; Kusuhara A; Maeda H; Negi A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 142(2):332-4. PubMed ID: 16876523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Icare Rebound Tonometer and Perkins Applanation Tonometer in Community Eye Screening.
Ting SL; Lim LT; Ooi CY; Rahman MM
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila); 2019; 8(3):229-232. PubMed ID: 31165604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of intraocular pressure measurement between Goldman applanation tonometer, rebound tonometer, non-contact tonometer, and its correlation with central corneal thickness.
Porwal AC; Shrishrimal M; Punamia RP; Mathew BC
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 71(5):1927-1931. PubMed ID: 37203058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measurement of the intraocular pressure with the "transpalpebral tonometer" TGDc-01 in comparison with applanation tonometry.
Sandner D; Böhm A; Kostov S; Pillunat L
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2005 Jun; 243(6):563-9. PubMed ID: 15614540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
