These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32518909)
1. Contrast-to-noise ratios of different dental restorative materials: an in-vitro cone beam computed tomography study. Bayrak S; Kursun Cakmak ES; Kamalak H Eur Oral Res; 2020 Jan; 54(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 32518909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast-to-noise ratio with different settings in a CBCT machine in presence of different root-end filling materials: an in vitro study. Demirturk Kocasarac H; Helvacioglu Yigit D; Bechara B; Sinanoglu A; Noujeim M Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(5):20160012. PubMed ID: 26954290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of different restorative materials on the detection of approximal caries in cone-beam computed tomography scans with and without metal artifact reduction mode. Cebe F; Aktan AM; Ozsevik AS; Ciftci ME; Surmelioglu HD Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2017 Mar; 123(3):392-400. PubMed ID: 28111155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of acquisition parameters on the magnitude of cone beam computed tomography artifacts. Freitas DQ; Fontenele RC; Nascimento EHL; Vasconcelos TV; Noujeim M Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Dec; 47(8):20180151. PubMed ID: 29916722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Effect of Different Field of View Sizes on Contrast-to-Noise Ratio of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Units: An In-Vitro Study. Niktash A; Mehralizadeh S; Talaeipour A Front Dent; 2022; 19():32. PubMed ID: 36865948 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of buccal marginal alveolar peri-implant and periodontal defects using a cone beam CT system with and without the application of metal artefact reduction mode. Kamburoglu K; Kolsuz E; Murat S; Eren H; Yüksel S; Paksoy CS Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(8):20130176. PubMed ID: 23956236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of a Motion Artifact Correction System on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Image Characteristics. Pahadia M; Katkar R; Geha H Cureus; 2023 Feb; 15(2):e35016. PubMed ID: 36819956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating the effects of orthodontic materials, field of view, and artifact reduction mode on accuracy of CBCT-based caries detection. Isman O; Aktan AM; Ertas ET Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Jul; 24(7):2487-2496. PubMed ID: 31811495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cone-beam Computed Tomographic-based Assessment of Filled C-shaped Canals: Artifact Expression of Cone-beam Computed Tomography as Opposed to Micro-computed Tomography and Nano-computed Tomography. Mazzi-Chaves JF; de Faria Vasconcelos K; Pauwels R; Jacobs R; Sousa-Neto MD J Endod; 2020 Nov; 46(11):1702-1711. PubMed ID: 32682791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the Metal Artifact Caused by Dental Implants in Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images. Vahdani N; Moudi E; Ghobadi F; Mohammadi E; Bijani A; Haghanifar S Maedica (Bucur); 2020 Jun; 15(2):224-229. PubMed ID: 32952687 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A Novel Method for Characterizing Beam Hardening Artifacts in Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Images. Fox A; Basrani B; Kishen A; Lam EWN J Endod; 2018 May; 44(5):869-874. PubMed ID: 29571911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Settings on Implant Artifact Production: Zirconia and Titanium. Vasconcelos TV; Leandro Nascimento EH; Bechara BB; Freitas DQ; Noujeim M Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(5):1114-1120. PubMed ID: 31528863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combining scatter reduction and correction to improve image quality in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Jin JY; Ren L; Liu Q; Kim J; Wen N; Guan H; Movsas B; Chetty IJ Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5634-44. PubMed ID: 21158275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimation of contrast-to-noise ratio in CT and CBCT images with varying scan settings in presence of different implant materials. Kursun-Cakmak EŞ; Demirturk Kocasarac H; Bayrak S; Ustaoğlu G; Noujeim M Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Dec; 48(8):20190139. PubMed ID: 31386553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the efficacy of the metal artifact reduction algorithm in the detection of a vertical root fracture in endodontically treated teeth in cone-beam computed tomography images: An in vitro study. Saati S; Eskandarloo A; Falahi A; Tapak L; Hekmat B Dent Med Probl; 2019; 56(4):357-363. PubMed ID: 31895500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Investigation of image quality of MV and kV CBCT with low-Z beams and high DQE detector. O'Connell J; Bazalova-Carter M Med Phys; 2022 Apr; 49(4):2334-2341. PubMed ID: 35098549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Beam Hardening Artifacts: Comparison between Two Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scanners. Esmaeili F; Johari M; Haddadi P; Vatankhah M J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2012; 6(2):49-53. PubMed ID: 22991636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic accuracy of different display types in detection of recurrent caries under restorations by using CBCT. Baltacıoĝlu İH; Eren H; Yavuz Y; Kamburoğlu K Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(6):20160099. PubMed ID: 27319604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of Volumetric Distortion Artifact in Filled Root Canals Using Different Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Devices. Celikten B; Jacobs R; deFaria Vasconcelos K; Huang Y; Nicolielo LFP; Orhan K J Endod; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1517-1521. PubMed ID: 28673491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]