These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32519086)

  • 21. Hemodynamics through the congenitally bicuspid aortic valve: a computational fluid dynamics comparison of opening orifice area and leaflet orientation.
    Mei S; de Souza Júnior FSN; Kuan MYS; Green NC; Espino DM
    Perfusion; 2016 Nov; 31(8):683-690. PubMed ID: 27484972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bicuspid aortic valve leaflet morphology in relation to aortic root morphology: a study of 300 patients undergoing open-heart surgery.
    Jackson V; Petrini J; Caidahl K; Eriksson MJ; Liska J; Eriksson P; Franco-Cereceda A
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Sep; 40(3):e118-24. PubMed ID: 21620721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Biomechanical implications of the congenital bicuspid aortic valve: a finite element study of aortic root function from in vivo data.
    Conti CA; Della Corte A; Votta E; Del Viscovo L; Bancone C; De Santo LS; Redaelli A
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Oct; 140(4):890-6, 896.e1-2. PubMed ID: 20363481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bicuspid aortic valve is associated with altered wall shear stress in the ascending aorta.
    Barker AJ; Markl M; Bürk J; Lorenz R; Bock J; Bauer S; Schulz-Menger J; von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Jul; 5(4):457-66. PubMed ID: 22730420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of the aortic valve leaflets on the fluid-dynamics in aorta in presence of a normally functioning bicuspid valve.
    Bonomi D; Vergara C; Faggiano E; Stevanella M; Conti C; Redaelli A; Puppini G; Faggian G; Formaggia L; Luciani GB
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2015 Nov; 14(6):1349-61. PubMed ID: 25943772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of bicuspid valve geometry on ascending aortic fluid dynamics: a parametric study.
    Vergara C; Viscardi F; Antiga L; Luciani GB
    Artif Organs; 2012 Apr; 36(4):368-78. PubMed ID: 21995712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Aortic distensibility in bicuspid aortic valve patients with normal aortic diameter.
    Moaref A; Khavanin M; Shekarforoush S
    Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis; 2014 Aug; 8(4):128-132. PubMed ID: 24797032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Age-related changes in aortic 3D blood flow velocities and wall shear stress: Implications for the identification of altered hemodynamics in patients with aortic valve disease.
    van Ooij P; Garcia J; Potters WV; Malaisrie SC; Collins JD; Carr JC; Markl M; Barker AJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 May; 43(5):1239-49. PubMed ID: 26477691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Wall Shear Stress Directional Abnormalities in BAV Aortas: Toward a New Hemodynamic Predictor of Aortopathy?
    Liu J; Shar JA; Sucosky P
    Front Physiol; 2018; 9():993. PubMed ID: 30154723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bicuspid aortic valve: four-dimensional MR evaluation of ascending aortic systolic flow patterns.
    Hope MD; Hope TA; Meadows AK; Ordovas KG; Urbania TH; Alley MT; Higgins CB
    Radiology; 2010 Apr; 255(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 20308444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fluid-Structure Interaction Study of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Dynamics Using Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics.
    Mao W; Li K; Sun W
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2016 Dec; 7(4):374-388. PubMed ID: 27844463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ex vivo assessment of valve thickness/calcification of patients with calcific aortic stenosis in relation to in vivo clinical outcomes.
    Cheng CL; Chang HH; Huang PJ; Wang WC; Lin SY
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Oct; 74():324-332. PubMed ID: 28651163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Investigation the effect of geometry and position of polymeric heart valves on hemodynamic with fluid-structure interaction numerical method.
    Farokhi EA; Niroomand-Oscuii H; Yazdanpanah K
    Med Eng Phys; 2021 Nov; 97():10-17. PubMed ID: 34756333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Multiphysics simulation of the effect of leaflet thickness inhomogeneity and material anisotropy on the stress-strain distribution on the aortic valve.
    Joda A; Jin Z; Haverich A; Summers J; Korossis S
    J Biomech; 2016 Aug; 49(12):2502-12. PubMed ID: 26961798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evidence of subannular and left ventricular morphological differences in patients with bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve stenosis: magnetic resonance imaging-based analysis.
    Disha K; Dubslaff G; Rouman M; Fey B; Borger MA; Barker AJ; Kuntze T; Girdauskas E
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2017 Mar; 24(3):369-376. PubMed ID: 28040769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of procedural, clinical and valve performance results of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic stenosis.
    Liao YB; Li YJ; Xiong TY; Ou YW; Lv WY; He JL; Li YM; Zhao ZG; Wei X; Xu YN; Feng Y; Chen M
    Int J Cardiol; 2018 Mar; 254():69-74. PubMed ID: 29246428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fluid-structure interaction modeling of calcific aortic valve disease using patient-specific three-dimensional calcification scans.
    Halevi R; Hamdan A; Marom G; Lavon K; Ben-Zekry S; Raanani E; Bluestein D; Haj-Ali R
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2016 Nov; 54(11):1683-1694. PubMed ID: 26906280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Elastic properties of the descending aorta in patients with a bicuspid or tricuspid aortic valve and aortic valvular disease.
    Petrini J; Jenner J; Rickenlund A; Eriksson P; Franco-Cereceda A; Caidahl K; Eriksson MJ
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2014 Apr; 27(4):393-404. PubMed ID: 24508365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of aortic valve morphology on vortical structures and wall shear stress.
    Jonnagiri R; Sundström E; Gutmark E; Anderson S; Pednekar AS; Taylor MD; Tretter JT; Gutmark-Little I
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2023 Jun; 61(6):1489-1506. PubMed ID: 36763231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Pathophysiological implications of different bicuspid aortic valve configurations.
    Kari FA; Beyersdorf F; Siepe M
    Cardiol Res Pract; 2012; 2012():735829. PubMed ID: 22685682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.