151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32519300)
1. Incremental criterion validity of message perceptions and effects perceptions in the context of anti-smoking messages.
Baig SA; Noar SM; Gottfredson NC; Lazard AJ; Ribisl KM; Brewer NT
J Behav Med; 2021 Feb; 44(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 32519300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Message perceptions and effects perceptions as proxies for behavioral impact in the context of anti-smoking messages.
Baig SA; Noar SM; Gottfredson NC; Lazard AJ; Ribisl KM; Brewer NT
Prev Med Rep; 2021 Sep; 23():101434. PubMed ID: 34194959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. UNC Perceived Message Effectiveness: Validation of a Brief Scale.
Baig SA; Noar SM; Gottfredson NC; Boynton MH; Ribisl KM; Brewer NT
Ann Behav Med; 2019 Jul; 53(8):732-742. PubMed ID: 30321252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of cigarette pack anti-littering messages.
Morgan JC; Jeong M; Mendel-Sheldon J; Noar SM; Ribisl KM; Brewer NT
Addict Behav; 2022 Mar; 126():107184. PubMed ID: 34906881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Why smokers avoid cigarette pack risk messages: Two randomized clinical trials in the United States.
Hall MG; Mendel JR; Noar SM; Brewer NT
Soc Sci Med; 2018 Sep; 213():165-172. PubMed ID: 30096636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effectiveness of Cessation Messages Targeting Pregnant and Nonpregnant Female Smokers in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Analysis into the Impact of Pregnancy, Self-Efficacy, and Risk Perception.
Busho AC; Macisco JM; Oslock AG; Worly BL; Klein EG
Matern Child Health J; 2020 Dec; 24(12):1515-1520. PubMed ID: 32857254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perceived Message Effectiveness: Do People Need to Think About Message Effectiveness to Report the Message as Effective?
Popova L; Li Y
Health Educ Behav; 2023 Jun; 50(3):441-449. PubMed ID: 35081824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does Perceived Message Effectiveness Predict the Actual Effectiveness of Tobacco Education Messages? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Noar SM; Barker J; Bell T; Yzer M
Health Commun; 2020 Feb; 35(2):148-157. PubMed ID: 30482058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tailored Cigarette Warning Messages: How Individualized Loss Aversion and Delay Discounting Rates Can Influence Perceived Message Effectiveness.
Tripp HL; Strickland JC; Mercincavage M; Audrain-McGovern J; Donny EC; Strasser AA
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Oct; 18(19):. PubMed ID: 34639792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Content Analysis of U.S. Adults' Open-Ended Responses to E-Cigarette Risk Messages.
Li Y; Yang B; Henderson K; Popova L
Health Commun; 2022 Mar; 37(3):285-295. PubMed ID: 33124482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Framing Pictorial Cigarette Warning Labels to Motivate Young Smokers to Quit.
Mays D; Turner MM; Zhao X; Evans WD; Luta G; Tercyak KP
Nicotine Tob Res; 2015 Jul; 17(7):769-75. PubMed ID: 25143295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Smokers' and Young Adult Non-Smokers' Perceptions and Perceived Impact of Snus and E-Cigarette Modified Risk Messages.
Wackowski OA; Rashid M; Greene KL; Lewis MJ; O'Connor RJ
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Sep; 17(18):. PubMed ID: 32961924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of Framing Proximal Benefits of Quitting and Motivation to Quit as a Query on Communications About Tobacco Constituents.
Kowitt S; Sheeran P; Jarman K; Ranney LM; Schmidt AM; Huang LL; Goldstein AO
Nicotine Tob Res; 2017 Oct; 19(10):1178-1184. PubMed ID: 27994002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perceptions of anti-smoking messages amongst high school students in Pakistan.
Zaidi SM; Bikak AL; Shaheryar A; Imam SH; Khan JA
BMC Public Health; 2011 Feb; 11():117. PubMed ID: 21333006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of the UNC Perceived Message Effectiveness Scale for Youth.
Noar SM; Gottfredson N; Vereen RN; Kurtzman R; Sheldon JM; Adams E; Hall MG; Brewer NT
Tob Control; 2023 Sep; 32(5):553-558. PubMed ID: 34930810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perceived Message Effectiveness Measures in Tobacco Education Campaigns: A Systematic Review.
Noar SM; Bell T; Kelley D; Barker J; Yzer M
Commun Methods Meas; 2018; 12(4):295-313. PubMed ID: 31428217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Examining the Longitudinal Relationship Between Perceived and Actual Message Effectiveness: A Randomized Trial.
Ma H; Gottfredson O'Shea N; Kieu T; Rohde JA; Hall MG; Brewer NT; Noar SM
Health Commun; 2024 Jul; 39(8):1510-1519. PubMed ID: 37316818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cigarette Graphic Warning Labels Are Not Created Equal: They Can Increase or Decrease Smokers' Quit Intentions Relative to Text-Only Warnings.
Evans AT; Peters E; Shoben AB; Meilleur LR; Klein EG; Tompkins MK; Romer D; Tusler M
Nicotine Tob Res; 2017 Oct; 19(10):1155-1162. PubMed ID: 28031378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perceptions and acceptability of pictorial health warning labels vs text only--a cross-sectional study in Lao PDR.
Sychareun V; Hansana V; Phengsavanh A; Chaleunvong K; Tomson T
BMC Public Health; 2015 Oct; 15():1094. PubMed ID: 26510415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cigarette Constituent Health Communications for Smokers: Impact of Chemical, Imagery, and Source.
Kowitt SD; Sheeran P; Jarman KL; Ranney LM; Schmidt AM; Noar SM; Huang LL; Goldstein AO
Nicotine Tob Res; 2019 May; 21(6):841-845. PubMed ID: 29059359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
