These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32520148)
21. Effects of E-Learning Environment Use on Visual Function of Elementary and Middle School Students: A Two-Year Assessment-Experience from China. Zhang Z; Xu G; Gao J; Wang L; Zhu Y; Li Z; Zhou W Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Feb; 17(5):. PubMed ID: 32121291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Screening for myopia and refractive errors using LogMAR visual acuity by optometrists and a simplified visual acuity chart by nurses. Tong L; Saw SM; Chan ES; Yap M; Lee HY; Kwang YP; Tan D Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Sep; 81(9):684-91. PubMed ID: 15365388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Assessment of the nutritional status and physical condition of basic education students in Chile]. Hernández-Mosqueira CM; Castillo Quezada HE; Peña-Troncoso S; Silva SFD; Cresp-Barría MA; Cárcamo-Oyarzun J; Martínez-Salazar C; Caniuqueo-Vargas A; Fernandes Filho J Nutr Hosp; 2020 Dec; 37(6):1166-1172. PubMed ID: 33119391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Metrics of retinal image quality predict visual performance in eyes with 20/17 or better visual acuity. Applegate RA; Marsack JD; Thibos LN Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Sep; 83(9):635-40. PubMed ID: 16971841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The dependency of logMAR visual acuity measurements on chart design and scoring rule. Hazel CA; Elliott DB Optom Vis Sci; 2002 Dec; 79(12):788-92. PubMed ID: 12512687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Screening for amblyopia among grade-1 students in primary school with uncorrected vision and stereopsis test in central China. Fu J; Li SM; Li JL; Li SY; Liu LR; Wang Y; Li H; Zhu BD; Ji YZ; Yang Z; Li L; Chen W; Wang NL; Chin Med J (Engl); 2013 Mar; 126(5):903-8. PubMed ID: 23489800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Age-related course of visual acuity obtained with ETDRS 2000 charts in persons with healthy eyes. Radner W; Benesch T Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Jun; 257(6):1295-1301. PubMed ID: 30989362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Comparison of two visual acuity tests in school enrolment examinations : Tumbling E test versus Freiburg visual acuity test]. Bach M; Reuter M; Lagrèze WA Ophthalmologe; 2016 Aug; 113(8):684-9. PubMed ID: 27048550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Construction and validation of logMAR visual acuity charts in seven Indian languages. Negiloni K; Mazumdar D; Neog A; Das B; Medhi J; Choudhury M; George RJ; Ramani KK Indian J Ophthalmol; 2018 May; 66(5):641-646. PubMed ID: 29676305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [A computerized method for visual acuity assessment]. Arippol PK; Salomão SR; Belfort R Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2006; 69(6):907-14. PubMed ID: 17273687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The Sonksen logMAR test of visual acuity: II. Age norms from 2 years 9 months to 8 years. Sonksen PM; Wade AM; Proffitt R; Heavens S; Salt AT J AAPOS; 2008 Feb; 12(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 17651997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of visual acuity estimates using three different letter charts under two ambient room illuminations. Chen AH; Norazman FN; Buari NH Indian J Ophthalmol; 2012; 60(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 22446903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of applicability of different visual acuity charts for pediatric outpatient visual tests. Fang H; Diao H; Chen L; Zeng J Eye Sci; 2014 Jun; 29(2):90-4. PubMed ID: 26011958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Is conversion of decimal visual acuity measurements to logMAR values reliable? Mataftsi A; Koutsimpogeorgos D; Brazitikos P; Ziakas N; Haidich AB Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Jul; 257(7):1513-1517. PubMed ID: 31069515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Development and Validation of the Minnesota Low Vision Reading Test (MNRead) Acuity Chart for the Asante Twi Language. Boadi-Kusi SB; Kwarteng MA; Asubonteng E Afr Health Sci; 2019 Dec; 19(4):2945-2953. PubMed ID: 32127869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Visual acuity assessment: a comparison of two tests for measuring children's vision. Jones D; Westall C; Averbeck K; Abdolell M Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2003 Nov; 23(6):541-6. PubMed ID: 14622358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of the potential acuity meter in predicting visual acuity after photodynamic therapy for choroidal neovascularization. Smith BT; Vander JE; Regillo CD; Ho AC Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2006; 37(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 16468545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Distance word acuity, critical print size and driving vision standards. Rae S; Latham K; Katsou MF Clin Exp Optom; 2015 Sep; 98(5):459-63. PubMed ID: 26390909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Prevalence of amblyopia and strabismus in a population of 7th-grade junior high school students in Central China: the Anyang Childhood Eye Study (ACES). Fu J; Li SM; Liu LR; Li JL; Li SY; Zhu BD; Li H; Yang Z; Li L; Wang NL; Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2014 Jun; 21(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 24742059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of near visual acuity and reading metrics in presbyopia correction. Gupta N; Wolffsohn JS; Naroo SA J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Aug; 35(8):1401-9. PubMed ID: 19631128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]