These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32520148)

  • 41. The reliability of grading the fixation preference test for the assessment of interocular visual acuity differences in patients with strabismus.
    Sener EC; Mocan MC; Gedik S; Ergin A; Sanaç AS
    J AAPOS; 2002 Jun; 6(3):191-4. PubMed ID: 12075297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The logMAR Kay picture test and the logMAR acuity test: a comparative study.
    Elliott MC; Firth AY
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Jan; 23(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 17901881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effects of Milk vs Dark Chocolate Consumption on Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity Within 2 Hours: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Rabin JC; Karunathilake N; Patrizi K
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 136(6):678-681. PubMed ID: 29710322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Visual function assessment of diagnostic radiography students.
    Lockwood P; Blackman A
    Radiography (Lond); 2020 May; 26(2):e56-e65. PubMed ID: 32052772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity testing for sports vision.
    Zimmerman AB; Lust KL; Bullimore MA
    Eye Contact Lens; 2011 May; 37(3):153-9. PubMed ID: 21378574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Sweep pattern visual evoked potential acuity in children during their periods of visual development.
    Li L; Su Y; Chen CZ; Feng C; Zheng HM; Xing YQ
    Ophthalmologica; 2011; 226(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 21811053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Visual acuity and its measurement.
    Kniestedt C; Stamper RL
    Ophthalmol Clin North Am; 2003 Jun; 16(2):155-70, v. PubMed ID: 12809155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. VEP-based acuity assessment in low vision.
    Hoffmann MB; Brands J; Behrens-Baumann W; Bach M
    Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Dec; 135(3):209-218. PubMed ID: 28980154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The effect of optical defocus on the test-retest variability of visual acuity measurements.
    Rosser DA; Murdoch IE; Cousens SN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Apr; 45(4):1076-9. PubMed ID: 15037571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Accuracy of IRAS GT interferometer and potential acuity meter prediction of visual acuity after phacoemulsification: prospective comparative study.
    Le Sage C; Bazalgette C; Arnaud B; Schmitt-Bernard CF
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2002 Jan; 28(1):131-8. PubMed ID: 11777722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Validation of an automated-ETDRS near and intermediate visual acuity measurement.
    Pang Y; Sparschu L; Nylin E
    Clin Exp Optom; 2020 Sep; 103(5):663-667. PubMed ID: 31822041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A computerized method of visual acuity testing: adaptation of the early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study testing protocol.
    Beck RW; Moke PS; Turpin AH; Ferris FL; SanGiovanni JP; Johnson CA; Birch EE; Chandler DL; Cox TA; Blair RC; Kraker RT
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Feb; 135(2):194-205. PubMed ID: 12566024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Parent-administered visual acuity testing: is it reliable and can it improve office efficiency?
    Paysse EA; Camejo L; Hussein MA; Coats DK
    J AAPOS; 2004 Aug; 8(4):332-7. PubMed ID: 15314593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effect of simulated refractive error on adult visual acuity for paediatric tests.
    Paudel N; Jacobs RJ; Sloan R; Denny S; Shea K; Thompson B; Anstice N
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jul; 37(4):521-530. PubMed ID: 28656671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Construction and Validation of LEA Hindi Chart: A Multicenter Study.
    Datta S; Varadharajan S; Mazumdar D; Narayanan A; Monira S; Panda S; Hyvärinen L; Satgunam P
    Optom Vis Sci; 2020 May; 97(5):351-359. PubMed ID: 32413007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Repeatability of Monocular Acuity Testing in Adults with and without Down Syndrome.
    Ravikumar A; Benoit JS; Morrison KB; Marsack JD; Anderson HA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Mar; 95(3):202-211. PubMed ID: 29461409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Automated determination of distance visual acuity: towards teleophthalmology services.
    Kumar S; Bulsara M; Yogesan K
    Clin Exp Optom; 2008 Nov; 91(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 18430039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Longitudinal comparison of visual acuity as measured by the ETDRS chart and by the potential acuity meter in eyes with macular edema, and its relationship with retinal thickness and sensitivity.
    Hatef E; Hanout M; Moradi A; Colantuoni E; Bittencourt M; Liu H; Sepah YJ; Ibrahim M; Do DV; Guyton DL; Nguyen QD
    Eye (Lond); 2014 Oct; 28(10):1239-45. PubMed ID: 25104744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Prevalence of myopia among secondary school students in Welkite town: South-Western Ethiopia.
    Gessesse SA; Teshome AW
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2020 May; 20(1):176. PubMed ID: 32366285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. How sensitive to clinical change are ETDRS logMAR visual acuity measurements?
    Rosser DA; Cousens SN; Murdoch IE; Fitzke FW; Laidlaw DA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Aug; 44(8):3278-81. PubMed ID: 12882770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.