These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32520490)

  • 1. Characterizing the Structural Integrity of Endotracheal Tube Taping Techniques: A Simulation Study.
    Matchett G; Yang JH; Sripathi NR; Simpkins L; Ruikar K; Minhajuddin A; Whitten CW
    Anesth Analg; 2020 Aug; 131(2):544-554. PubMed ID: 32520490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparative study of oral tracheal tube extubation force in a baby manikin model: taping methods and tube diameters].
    Kurokawa Y; Shimizu T; Yamashita S; Tanaka M; Mizutani T
    Masui; 2011 Aug; 60(8):982-4. PubMed ID: 21861432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Endotracheal tube extubation force: adhesive tape versus endotracheal tube holder.
    Shimizu T; Mizutani T; Yamashita S; Hagiya K; Tanaka M
    Respir Care; 2011 Nov; 56(11):1825-9. PubMed ID: 21605477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Extubation force: tape versus endotracheal tube holders.
    Carlson J; Mayrose J; Krause R; Jehle D
    Ann Emerg Med; 2007 Dec; 50(6):686-91. PubMed ID: 17599694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Extubation force depends upon angle of force application and fixation technique: a study of 7 methods.
    Wagner JL; Shandas R; Lanning CJ
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2014; 14():74. PubMed ID: 25214815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Taping methods and tape types for securing oral endotracheal tubes.
    Patel N; Smith CE; Pinchak AC; Hancock DE
    Can J Anaesth; 1997 Mar; 44(3):330-6. PubMed ID: 9067056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Comparison of the Haider Tube-Guard® Endotracheal Tube Holder Versus Adhesive Tape to Determine if This Novel Device Can Reduce Endotracheal Tube Movement and Prevent Unplanned Extubation.
    Buckley JC; Brown AP; Shin JS; Rogers KM; Hoftman NN
    Anesth Analg; 2016 May; 122(5):1439-43. PubMed ID: 26983051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Modified Tie Technique for Securing Endotracheal Tubes.
    Walters HR; Young HE; Young PJ
    Respir Care; 2018 Apr; 63(4):424-429. PubMed ID: 29511036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of commercial and noncommercial endotracheal tube-securing devices.
    Fisher DF; Chenelle CT; Marchese AD; Kratohvil JP; Kacmarek RM
    Respir Care; 2014 Sep; 59(9):1315-23. PubMed ID: 24368866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of adhesive tape versus endotracheal tube fastener in critically ill adults: the endotracheal tube securement (ETTS) randomized controlled trial.
    Landsperger JS; Byram JM; Lloyd BD; Rice TW;
    Crit Care; 2019 May; 23(1):161. PubMed ID: 31064406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Extubation force: a comparison of adhesive tape, non-adhesive tape and a commercial endotracheal tube holder.
    Owen R; Castle N; Hann H; Reeves D; Naidoo R; Naidoo S
    Resuscitation; 2009 Nov; 80(11):1296-300. PubMed ID: 19726121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of methods used to secure pediatric endotracheal tubes using a live human dermal model.
    Gamble JJ; McKay WP; Peeling A; Durr C; Krysak T; Guo R; Lange T; Cowen J; Bajwa JS
    Can J Anaesth; 2021 May; 68(5):645-652. PubMed ID: 33438171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Endotracheal tube fixation methods for optimal stability: a comparison of adhesive tape, suture, and tape-suture fixation.
    Farbod F; Tuli P; Robertson BF; Jackson IT
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 21(4):1250-1. PubMed ID: 20613600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of techniques for securing the endotracheal tube while wearing chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear protection: a manikin study.
    Castle N; Owen R; Clark S; Hann M; Reeces D; Gurney I
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2010; 25(6):589-94. PubMed ID: 21181696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Shifts in endotracheal tube position due to chest compressions: a simulation comparison by fixation method.
    Komasawa N; Fujiwara S; Miyazaki S; Ohchi F; Minami T
    J Emerg Med; 2015 Feb; 48(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 25440458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of two endotracheal tube securement techniques on unplanned extubation, oral mucosa, and facial skin integrity.
    Barnason S; Graham J; Wild MC; Jensen LB; Rasmussen D; Schulz P; Woods S; Carder B
    Heart Lung; 1998; 27(6):409-17. PubMed ID: 9835671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changing Endotracheal Tube Taping Practice: An Evidence-based Practice Project.
    Krug L; Machan MD; Villalba J
    AANA J; 2016 Aug; 84(4):261-70. PubMed ID: 30501152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the Force Required for Dislodgement Between Secured and Unsecured Airways.
    Davenport C; Martin-Gill C; Wang HE; Mayrose J; Carlson JN
    Prehosp Emerg Care; 2018; 22(6):778-781. PubMed ID: 29714527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of tube-taping versus a tube-holding device for securing endotracheal tubes in adults undergoing surgery in prone position.
    Santhosh MC; Torgal SV; Pai RB; Roopa S; Santoshi VB; Rao RP
    Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2013; 64(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 24191528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prevention of accidental extubation in newborns.
    Brown MS
    Am J Dis Child; 1988 Nov; 142(11):1240-3. PubMed ID: 3269711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.