154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32520744)
1. Satisfaction and Regret Following Uterosacral Ligament Suspension and Sacrocolpopexy: A Prospective Multicenter Analysis From the Fellows' Pelvic Research Network.
Bastawros D; Rabon H; Noor N; Florian-Rodriguez ME; Hobson D; Tarr ME
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jan; 27(1):e70-e74. PubMed ID: 32520744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function.
De La Cruz JF; Myers EM; Geller EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 24780383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Body Image, Regret, and Satisfaction 24 Weeks After Colpocleisis: A Multicenter Study.
Crisp CC; Book NM; Cunkelman JA; Tieu AL; Pauls RN;
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(3):132-5. PubMed ID: 26571434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prolapse recurrence following sacrocolpopexy vs uterosacral ligament suspension: a comparison stratified by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage.
Lavelle ES; Giugale LE; Winger DG; Wang L; Carter-Brooks CM; Shepherd JP
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 218(1):116.e1-116.e5. PubMed ID: 28951262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Body image, regret, and satisfaction following colpocleisis.
Crisp CC; Book NM; Smith AL; Cunkelman JA; Mishan V; Treszezamsky AD; Adams SR; Apostolis C; Lowenstein L; Pauls RN;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Nov; 209(5):473.e1-7. PubMed ID: 23665244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anatomic outcomes of vaginal mesh procedure (Prolift) compared with uterosacral ligament suspension and abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a Fellows' Pelvic Research Network study.
Sanses TV; Shahryarinejad A; Molden S; Hoskey KA; Abbasy S; Patterson D; Saks EK; Weber LeBrun EE; Gamble TL; King VG; Nguyen AL; Abed H; Young SB;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 201(5):519.e1-8. PubMed ID: 19716533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Anatomical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction After Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy for Anterior and Apical Prolapse.
Haj Yahya R; Chill HH; Herzberg S; Asfour A; Lesser S; Shveiky D
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(5):352-355. PubMed ID: 28658003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. RCT of vaginal extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension (VEULS) with anterior mesh versus sacrocolpopexy: 4-year outcome.
Ow LL; Lim YN; Lee J; Murray C; Thomas E; Leitch A; Rosamilia A; Dwyer PL
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Nov; 29(11):1607-1614. PubMed ID: 29961110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Obliterative Surgery for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Patient Survey on Reasons for Surgery Selection and Postoperative Decision Regret and Satisfaction.
Takase-Sanchez MM; Brooks HM; Hale DS; Heit MH
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(6):325-31. PubMed ID: 26506160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Long-term effectiveness of transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension].
Duan L; Lu YX; Shen WJ; Liu X; Liu JX; Zhang YH; Ge J; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 52(6):363-368. PubMed ID: 28647957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [A five-year analysis of effect on transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension with or without native-tissue repair for middle compartment defect].
Zhang YH; Lu YX; Liu X; Liu JX; Shen WJ; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jul; 54(7):445-451. PubMed ID: 31365956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. National Analysis of Perioperative Morbidity of Vaginal Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy at the Time of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension.
Chapman GC; Slopnick EA; Roberts K; Sheyn D; Wherley S; Mahajan ST; Pollard RR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):275-281. PubMed ID: 32450226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic Versus Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature.
Douligeris A; Kathopoulis N; Zachariou E; Mortaki A; Zacharakis D; Kypriotis K; Chatzipapas I; Protopapas A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2024 Jun; 31(6):477-487. PubMed ID: 38493827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perioperative outcomes after robotic versus vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.
Nguyen JN; Yang ST
J Robot Surg; 2020 Jun; 14(3):415-421. PubMed ID: 31332703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy for Treatment of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Smith BC; Crisp CC; Kleeman SD; Yook E; Pauls RN
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(2):93-98. PubMed ID: 30807407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy With Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study Through the Fellows' Pelvic Research Network.
Noor N; Bastawros D; Florian-Rodriguez ME; Hobson D; Eto C; Lozo S; Lavelle E; Antosh D; Hacker MR; Elkadry E; Von Bargen E
Urogynecology (Phila); 2022 Oct; 28(10):687-694. PubMed ID: 35830589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anterior Wall Success at 1 Year After Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension and Sacral Colpopexy.
Bastawros DA; Tarr ME; Templin MA; Stepp KJ; Taylor GB; Myers EM
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2020 Oct; 26(10):612-616. PubMed ID: 30394992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High uterosacral vault suspension vs Sacrocolpopexy for treating apical defects: a randomized controlled trial with twelve months follow-up.
Rondini C; Braun H; Alvarez J; Urzúa MJ; Villegas R; Wenzel C; Descouvieres C
Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Aug; 26(8):1131-8. PubMed ID: 25910610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of decision-making outcomes for female pelvic floor disorders.
Sung VW; Kauffman N; Raker CA; Myers DL; Clark MA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 May; 198(5):575.e1-6. PubMed ID: 18313632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
