50 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32520744)
21. Surgical repair of vaginal vault prolapse; a comparison between ipsilateral uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation-a nationwide cohort study.
Husby KR; Larsen MD; Lose G; Klarskov N
Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Jun; 32(6):1441-1449. PubMed ID: 32897459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Pain after permanent versus delayed absorbable monofilament suture for vaginal graft attachment during minimally invasive total hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy.
Bretschneider CE; Kenton K; Geller EJ; Wu JM; Matthews CA
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Oct; 31(10):2035-2041. PubMed ID: 32845399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A Phase 1 Trial of Highly Conformal, Hypofractionated Postprostatectomy Radiation Therapy.
Patel KR; Rowe LS; Schott E; Cooley-Zgela T; Ning H; Turkbey B; Choyke P; Lindenberg L; Mena E; Pinto PA; Zhang Q; Shih J; Salerno KE; Citrin DE
Adv Radiat Oncol; 2022; 7(6):101024. PubMed ID: 36420197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function.
De La Cruz JF; Myers EM; Geller EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 24780383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Body Image, Regret, and Satisfaction 24 Weeks After Colpocleisis: A Multicenter Study.
Crisp CC; Book NM; Cunkelman JA; Tieu AL; Pauls RN;
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(3):132-5. PubMed ID: 26571434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prolapse recurrence following sacrocolpopexy vs uterosacral ligament suspension: a comparison stratified by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage.
Lavelle ES; Giugale LE; Winger DG; Wang L; Carter-Brooks CM; Shepherd JP
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 218(1):116.e1-116.e5. PubMed ID: 28951262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Body image, regret, and satisfaction following colpocleisis.
Crisp CC; Book NM; Smith AL; Cunkelman JA; Mishan V; Treszezamsky AD; Adams SR; Apostolis C; Lowenstein L; Pauls RN;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Nov; 209(5):473.e1-7. PubMed ID: 23665244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Satisfaction and Regret Following Uterosacral Ligament Suspension and Sacrocolpopexy: A Prospective Multicenter Analysis From the Fellows' Pelvic Research Network.
Bastawros D; Rabon H; Noor N; Florian-Rodriguez ME; Hobson D; Tarr ME
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jan; 27(1):e70-e74. PubMed ID: 32520744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Laparoscopic Versus Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature.
Douligeris A; Kathopoulis N; Zachariou E; Mortaki A; Zacharakis D; Kypriotis K; Chatzipapas I; Protopapas A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2024 Jun; 31(6):477-487. PubMed ID: 38493827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Management of apical pelvic organ prolapse.
Alas AN; Anger JT
Curr Urol Rep; 2015 May; 16(5):33. PubMed ID: 25874589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Abdominal and vaginal pelvic support with concomitant hysterectomy for uterovaginal pelvic prolapse: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis.
Alfahmy A; Mahran A; Conroy B; Brewka RR; Ibrahim M; Sheyn D; El-Nashar SA; Hijaz A
Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Aug; 32(8):2021-2031. PubMed ID: 34050771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Perioperative interventions in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
Haya N; Feiner B; Baessler K; Christmann-Schmid C; Maher C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Aug; 8(8):CD013105. PubMed ID: 30121957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
