390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32521099)
1. Safety of transradial access compared to transfemoral access with hemostatic devices (vessel plugs and suture devices) after percutaneous coronary interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chugh Y; Bavishi C; Mojadidi MK; Elgendy IY; Faillace RT; Brilakis ES; Tamis-Holland J; Mamas M; Chugh SK
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Aug; 96(2):285-295. PubMed ID: 32521099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Transfemoral approach with systematic use of FemoSeal™ closure device compared to transradial approach in primary angioplasty.
Alonzo A; Rigattieri S; Giovannelli F; Di Russo C; Sciahbasi A; Berni A; Volpe M
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):849-54. PubMed ID: 26104978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Left main percutaneous coronary intervention-Radial versus femoral access: A systematic analysis.
Goel S; Pasam RT; Raheja H; Gotesman J; Gidwani U; Ahuja KR; Reed G; Puri R; Khatri JK; Kapadia SR
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jun; 95(7):E201-E213. PubMed ID: 31430040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Safety and efficacy of clip-based vs. suture mediated vascular closure for femoral access hemostasis: A prospective randomized single center study comparing the StarClose and the ProGlide device.
Klein-Wiele O; Baliota M; Kara K; Käunicke M; Schäfer H; Garbrecht M; Abdulghafor M; Garmer M; Hailer B
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):402-407. PubMed ID: 28500743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transradial Versus Transfemoral Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Bajaj A; Pancholy S; Sothwal A; Nawaz Y; Boruah P
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Sep; 20(9):790-798. PubMed ID: 30442537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of arterial access site selection on outcomes in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: are the results of randomized trials achievable in clinical practice?
Mamas MA; Ratib K; Routledge H; Neyses L; Fraser DG; de Belder M; Ludman PF; Nolan J;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jul; 6(7):698-706. PubMed ID: 23769648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Access site practice and procedural outcomes in relation to clinical presentation in 439,947 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the United kingdom.
Ratib K; Mamas MA; Anderson SG; Bhatia G; Routledge H; De Belder M; Ludman PF; Fraser D; Nolan J;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jan; 8(1 Pt A):20-9. PubMed ID: 25616814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of manual compression and vascular hemostasis devices after coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention through femoral artery access: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Dahal K; Rijal J; Shahukhal R; Sharma S; Watti H; Azrin M; Katikaneni P; Jimenez E; Tandon N; Modi K; Lee J
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2018 Mar; 19(2):151-162. PubMed ID: 28941744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of Access Site on Bleeding and Ischemic Events in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Prasugrel: The ACCOAST Access Substudy.
Porto I; Bolognese L; Dudek D; Goldstein P; Hamm C; Tanguay JF; Ten Berg J; Widimský P; Le Gall N; Zagar AJ; LeNarz LA; Miller D; Montalescot G;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 May; 9(9):897-907. PubMed ID: 27151605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of radial versus femoral access using hemostatic devices following percutaneous coronary intervention.
Rana N; Vijayvergiya R; Kasinadhuni G; Khanal S; Panda P
Indian Heart J; 2021; 73(3):382-384. PubMed ID: 34154763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Full conversion from transfemoral to transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions results in a similar success rate and a rapid reduction of in-hospital cardiac and vascular major events.
Dangoisse V; Guédès A; Gabriel L; Jamart J; Chenu P; Marchandise B; Schroeder E
EuroIntervention; 2013 Jul; 9(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 23872649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transulnar versus transradial access for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Dahal K; Rijal J; Lee J; Korr KS; Azrin M
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):857-65. PubMed ID: 26332022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Association of radial versus femoral access with contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Kolte D; Spence N; Puthawala M; Hyder O; Tuohy CP; Davidson CB; Sheldon MW; Laskey WK; Abbott JD
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016 Dec; 17(8):546-551. PubMed ID: 27566903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationship Between Femoral Vascular Closure Devices and Short-Term Mortality From 271 845 Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Procedures Performed in the United Kingdom Between 2006 and 2011: A Propensity Score-Corrected Analysis From the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society.
Farooq V; Goedhart D; Ludman P; de Belder MA; Harcombe A; El-Omar M;
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 27225421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Single suture-mediated closure system after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A single-center real-world experience.
Iacovelli F; Burattini O; Sturdà F; Branca M; Stabile E; Fimiani L; Salemme L; Cioppa A; Pucciarelli A; Cafaro A; Bortone AS; Contegiacomo G; Pignatelli A; Tesorio T
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 Jun; 103(7):1125-1137. PubMed ID: 38639140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ahsan MJ; Ahmad S; Latif A; Lateef N; Ahsan MZ; Abusnina W; Nathan S; Altin SE; Kolte DS; Messenger JC; Tannenbaum M; Goldsweig AM
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes; 2022 Sep; 8(6):640-650. PubMed ID: 35460230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transradial versus transfemoral approach in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome. A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Piccolo R; Galasso G; Capuano E; De Luca S; Esposito G; Trimarco B; Piscione F
PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e96127. PubMed ID: 24820096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects on Mortality and Major Bleeding of Radial Versus Femoral Artery Access for Coronary Angiography or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data From 7 Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trials.
Gargiulo G; Giacoppo D; Jolly SS; Cairns J; Le May M; Bernat I; Romagnoli E; Rao SV; van Leeuwen MAH; Mehta SR; Bertrand OF; Wells GA; Meijers TA; Siontis GCM; Esposito G; Windecker S; Jüni P; Valgimigli M;
Circulation; 2022 Nov; 146(18):1329-1343. PubMed ID: 36036610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Safety and effectiveness of a novel vascular closure device: a prospective study of the ExoSeal compared to the Angio-Seal and ProGlide.
Kara K; Mahabadi AA; Rothe H; Müller P; Krüger J; Neubauer H; Klein-Wiele O; Mügge A; Kahlert P; Erbel R
J Endovasc Ther; 2014 Dec; 21(6):822-8. PubMed ID: 25453885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical efficacy and safety of the PRO-glide device as a sUture-mediated ClosurE in Thoracic EndoVascular Aortic Repair in patients with previous groin intervention (from the PRODUCE-TEVAR Trial).
Çelik Ö; Şahin AA; Güner A; Demir AR; Uzun N; Ertürk M
Vascular; 2021 Apr; 29(2):237-243. PubMed ID: 32829695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
