These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
497 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32521407)
1. Midwives' experiences of the factors that facilitate normal birth among low risk women in public hospitals in Catalonia (Spain). Anna MA; Olga CV; Rocío CS; Isabel SP; Xavier ET; Pablo RC; Montserrat PA; Cristina GB; Ramon E Midwifery; 2020 Sep; 88():102752. PubMed ID: 32521407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Midwives' experiences of the factors that facilitate normal birth among low risk women at a public hospital in Australia. Carolan-Olah M; Kruger G; Garvey-Graham A Midwifery; 2015 Jan; 31(1):112-21. PubMed ID: 25132098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An integrative literature review on midwives' perceptions on the facilitators and barriers of physiological birth. Wong CYW; He HG; Shorey S; Koh SSL Int J Nurs Pract; 2017 Dec; 23(6):. PubMed ID: 29072353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In Cyprus, 'midwifery is dying...'. A qualitative exploration of midwives' perceptions of their role as advocates for normal childbirth. Hadjigeorgiou E; Coxon K Midwifery; 2014 Sep; 30(9):983-90. PubMed ID: 24054434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A story of scrutiny and fear: Australian midwives' experiences of an external review of obstetric services, being involved with litigation and the impact on clinical practice. Hood L; Fenwick J; Butt J Midwifery; 2010 Jun; 26(3):268-85. PubMed ID: 18804902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Midwives' perceptions of women's mobile phone use and impact on care in birth suite. Lewis L; Barnes C; Allan J; Roberts L; Lube D; Hauck YL Midwifery; 2019 Sep; 76():142-147. PubMed ID: 31207448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Research utilisation in clinical practice: the experience of nurses and midwives working in public hospitals. Dagne AH; Tebeje H/D Reprod Health; 2021 Mar; 18(1):62. PubMed ID: 33722262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Epidurals during normal labour and birth - Midwives' attitudes and experiences. Aune I; Brøtmet S; Grytskog KH; Sperstad EB Women Birth; 2021 Jul; 34(4):e384-e389. PubMed ID: 32843237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors influencing midwives' intentions to facilitate normal physiological birth: A qualitative study. Meyer H; Lee N; George K; Kearney L Women Birth; 2024 Jul; 37(4):101617. PubMed ID: 38701683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Caring behaviours by midwives: Jordanian women's perceptions during childbirth. Khresheh R; Barclay L; Shoqirat N Midwifery; 2019 Jul; 74():1-5. PubMed ID: 30908974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Midwives perceptions: Birth unit environment and the implementation of best intrapartum care practices. Malesela JML Women Birth; 2021 Feb; 34(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 32507503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perineal management: Midwives' confidence and educational needs. Carroll L; Sheehy L; Doherty J; O'Brien D; Brosnan M; Cronin M; Dougan N; Coughlan B; Kirwan C Midwifery; 2020 Nov; 90():102817. PubMed ID: 32805592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors influencing the clinical decision-making of midwives: a qualitative study. Daemers DOA; van Limbeek EBM; Wijnen HAA; Nieuwenhuijze MJ; de Vries RG BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Oct; 17(1):345. PubMed ID: 28985725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Iranian midwives' lived experiences of providing continuous midwife-led intrapartum care: a qualitative study. Amiri-Farahani L; Gharacheh M; Sadeghzadeh N; Peyravi H; Pezaro S BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Sep; 22(1):724. PubMed ID: 36151533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving the quality and content of midwives' discussions with low-risk women about their options for place of birth: Co-production and evaluation of an intervention package. Henshall C; Taylor B; Goodwin L; Farre A; Jones ME; Kenyon S Midwifery; 2018 Apr; 59():118-126. PubMed ID: 29421641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of the implementation of the model of integrated and humanised midwifery health services in Chile. Binfa L; Pantoja L; Ortiz J; Gurovich M; Cavada G; Foster J Midwifery; 2016 Apr; 35():53-61. PubMed ID: 27060401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A qualitative study of factors that influence midwives' practice in relation to low-risk women's oral intake in labour in Australia. Tadaumi M; Sweet L; Graham K Women Birth; 2020 Sep; 33(5):e455-e463. PubMed ID: 31796342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A meta-ethnographic synthesis of midwives' and nurses' experiences of adverse labour and birth events. Elmir R; Pangas J; Dahlen H; Schmied V J Clin Nurs; 2017 Dec; 26(23-24):4184-4200. PubMed ID: 28722761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Midwives' experiences of caring for women's emotional and mental well-being during pregnancy. Fletcher A; Murphy M; Leahy-Warren P J Clin Nurs; 2021 May; 30(9-10):1403-1416. PubMed ID: 33527534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Midwives' perceptions of women's preferences related to midwifery care in Germany: A focus group study. Lohmann S; Mattern E; Ayerle GM Midwifery; 2018 Jun; 61():53-62. PubMed ID: 29529579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]