These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32521518)

  • 21. Impact of dose engine algorithm in pencil beam scanning proton therapy for breast cancer.
    Tommasino F; Fellin F; Lorentini S; Farace P
    Phys Med; 2018 Jun; 50():7-12. PubMed ID: 29891097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Parallel beamlet dose calculation via beamlet contexts in a distributed multi-GPU framework.
    Neph R; Ouyang C; Neylon J; Yang Y; Sheng K
    Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 46(8):3719-3733. PubMed ID: 31183871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Experimental realization of dynamic fluence field optimization for proton computed tomography.
    Dickmann J; Sarosiek C; Rykalin V; Pankuch M; Rit S; Detrich N; Coutrakon G; Johnson RP; Schulte RW; Parodi K; Landry G; Dedes G
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Sep; 65(19):195001. PubMed ID: 32575084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A pencil beam algorithm for intensity modulated proton therapy derived from Monte Carlo simulations.
    Soukup M; Fippel M; Alber M
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Nov; 50(21):5089-104. PubMed ID: 16237243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dose verification of an IMRT treatment planning system with the BEAM EGS4-based Monte Carlo code.
    Francescon P; Cora S; Chiovati P
    Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):144-57. PubMed ID: 12607832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Fluence-modulated proton CT optimized with patient-specific dose and variance objectives for proton dose calculation.
    Dickmann J; Kamp F; Hillbrand M; Corradini S; Belka C; Schulte RW; Parodi K; Dedes G; Landry G
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 Mar; 66(6):064001. PubMed ID: 33545701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of two pencil beam scanning treatment planning systems for proton therapy.
    Langner UW; Mundis M; Strauss D; Zhu M; Mossahebi S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):156-163. PubMed ID: 29205763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A novel algorithm for the calculation of physical and biological irradiation quantities in scanned ion beam therapy: the beamlet superposition approach.
    Russo G; Attili A; Battistoni G; Bertrand D; Bourhaleb F; Cappucci F; Ciocca M; Mairani A; Milian FM; Molinelli S; Morone MC; Muraro S; Orts T; Patera V; Sala P; Schmitt E; Vivaldo G; Marchetto F
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jan; 61(1):183-214. PubMed ID: 26630246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dosimetric evaluation of a commercial proton spot scanning Monte-Carlo dose algorithm: comparisons against measurements and simulations.
    Saini J; Maes D; Egan A; Bowen SR; St James S; Janson M; Wong T; Bloch C
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7659-7681. PubMed ID: 28749373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Experimental and Monte Carlo characterization of a dynamic collimation system prototype for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
    Smith BR; Pankuch M; Hyer DE; Culberson WS
    Med Phys; 2020 Oct; 47(10):5343-5356. PubMed ID: 33411329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of the influence of double and triple Gaussian proton kernel models on accuracy of dose calculations for spot scanning technique.
    Hirayama S; Takayanagi T; Fujii Y; Fujimoto R; Fujitaka S; Umezawa M; Nagamine Y; Hosaka M; Yasui K; Omachi C; Toshito T
    Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1437-50. PubMed ID: 26936728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
    Rana S; Zheng Y
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A pencil beam algorithm for helium ion beam therapy.
    Fuchs H; Strobele J; Schreiner T; Hirtl A; Georg D
    Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6726-37. PubMed ID: 23127066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Performance of a hybrid Monte Carlo-Pencil Beam dose algorithm for proton therapy inverse planning.
    Barragán Montero AM; Souris K; Sanchez-Parcerisa D; Sterpin E; Lee JA
    Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):846-862. PubMed ID: 29159915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A method for modeling laterally asymmetric proton beamlets resulting from collimation.
    Gelover E; Wang D; Hill PM; Flynn RT; Gao M; Laub S; Pankuch M; Hyer DE
    Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 42(3):1321-34. PubMed ID: 25735287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Validation and application of a fast Monte Carlo algorithm for assessing the clinical impact of approximations in analytical dose calculations for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
    Huang S; Souris K; Li S; Kang M; Barragan Montero AM; Janssens G; Lin A; Garver E; Ainsley C; Taylor P; Xiao Y; Lin L
    Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5631-5642. PubMed ID: 30295950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Integrated beam orientation and scanning-spot optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy for brain and unilateral head and neck tumors.
    Gu W; O'Connor D; Nguyen D; Yu VY; Ruan D; Dong L; Sheng K
    Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1338-1350. PubMed ID: 29394454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Application of the pencil-beam redefinition algorithm in heterogeneous media for proton beam therapy.
    Egashira Y; Nishio T; Hotta K; Kohno R; Uesaka M
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Feb; 58(4):1169-84. PubMed ID: 23370731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Direct aperture optimization for IMRT using Monte Carlo generated beamlets.
    Bergman AM; Bush K; Milette MP; Popescu IA; Otto K; Duzenli C
    Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3666-79. PubMed ID: 17089832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Efficiency enhancements of a Monte Carlo beamlet based treatment planning process: implementation and parameter study.
    Mueller S; Guyer G; Volken W; Frei D; Torelli N; Aebersold DM; Manser P; Fix MK
    Phys Med Biol; 2023 Feb; 68(4):. PubMed ID: 36655485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.