These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. WASP (Write a Scientific Paper) using Excel - 1: Data entry and validation. Grech V Early Hum Dev; 2018 Feb; 117():98-103. PubMed ID: 29361329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. WASP (Write a Scientific Paper) using Excel - 2: Pivot tables. Grech V Early Hum Dev; 2018 Feb; 117():104-109. PubMed ID: 29338977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Medical journal peer review: process and bias. Manchikanti L; Kaye AD; Boswell MV; Hirsch JA Pain Physician; 2015; 18(1):E1-E14. PubMed ID: 25675064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Peer review guidance: how do you write a good review? Allen TW J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2013 Dec; 113(12):916-20. PubMed ID: 24285034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rules to be adopted for publishing a scientific paper. Picardi N Ann Ital Chir; 2016; 87():1-3. PubMed ID: 28474609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. WASP (Write a Scientific Paper) using Excel 9: Analysis of variance. Grech V Early Hum Dev; 2018 Jun; 121():62-64. PubMed ID: 29510887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. WASP (Write a Scientific Paper) using Excel - 10: Contingency tables. Grech V Early Hum Dev; 2018 Jun; 121():65-68. PubMed ID: 29502902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The peer review process: a primer for Hirsch JA; Manchikanti L; Albuquerque FC; Leslie-Mazwi TM; Lev MH; Linfante I; Mocco J; Rai AT; Schaefer PW; Tarr RW J Neurointerv Surg; 2017 Jul; 9(e1):e3-e6. PubMed ID: 25888447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. WASP (Write a Scientific Paper) using Excel - 8: t-Tests. Grech V Early Hum Dev; 2018 Jun; 121():58-61. PubMed ID: 29501324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [A critical review of the "peer review" process]. Alfonso F Arch Cardiol Mex; 2010; 80(4):272-82. PubMed ID: 21169092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: how much statistical knowledge should a reviewer really know? Morton JP Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Mar; 33(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 19261753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A guide to performing a peer review of randomised controlled trials. Del Mar C; Hoffmann TC BMC Med; 2015 Nov; 13():248. PubMed ID: 26521647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving the peer-review process from the perspective of an author and reviewer. Faggion CM Br Dent J; 2016 Feb; 220(4):167-8. PubMed ID: 26917302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Guidelines on good publication practice. Committee on Public Ethics. J Postgrad Med; 2000; 46(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 11298477 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]