These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
45. Antibacterial effect of different root canal sealers on three bacterial species. Heyder M; Kranz S; Völpel A; Pfister W; Watts DC; Jandt KD; Sigusch BW Dent Mater; 2013 May; 29(5):542-9. PubMed ID: 23523285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. An Evaluation of Wetting and Adhesion of Three Bioceramic Root Canal Sealers to Intraradicular Human Dentin. Ha JH; Kim HC; Kim YK; Kwon TY Materials (Basel); 2018 Jul; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 30044435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Effect of chlorhexidine digluconate on antimicrobial activity, cell viability and physicochemical properties of three endodontic sealers. Kapralos V; Sunde PT; Camilleri J; Morisbak E; Koutroulis A; Ørstavik D; Valen H Dent Mater; 2022 Jun; 38(6):1044-1059. PubMed ID: 35491276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Antibacterial activity of a new endodontic sealer against Enterococcus faecalis. Bodrumlu E; Semiz M J Can Dent Assoc; 2006 Sep; 72(7):637. PubMed ID: 16978482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Interfacial Characteristics and Cytocompatibility of Hydraulic Sealer Cements. Kebudi Benezra M; Schembri Wismayer P; Camilleri J J Endod; 2018 Jun; 44(6):1007-1017. PubMed ID: 29398087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Antibacterial Activity of MTA Fillapex and AH 26 Root Canal Sealers at Different Time Intervals. Jafari F; Samadi Kafil H; Jafari S; Aghazadeh M; Momeni T Iran Endod J; 2016; 11(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 27471530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Obturated with Different Root Canal Sealers (A Comparative Study). Mohammed YT; Al-Zaka IM J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 May; 21(5):490-493. PubMed ID: 32690829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Efficacy of Reciprocating Instruments in the Removal of Bioceramic and Epoxy Resin-Based Sealers: Micro-CT Analysis. Rajda M; Miletić I; Baršić G; Krmek SJ; Šnjarić D; Baraba A Materials (Basel); 2021 Nov; 14(21):. PubMed ID: 34772195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Antibacterial Efficacy of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Bioactive Glass and Epoxy-Resin Based Sealer: An Dutta SK; Singh CV; Hans MK; Bathla S; Singh V; Mishra S J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2024 Feb; 16(Suppl 1):S619-S622. PubMed ID: 38595478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. In vitro evaluation of the antibacterial effects of MTA- Fillapex and BIO-C® sealer at different time intervals. Raouf SH; Bakr DK; Ahmed UM; Amin BK Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand); 2023 Apr; 69(4):116-119. PubMed ID: 37329538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial activity of two root canal sealers: MTA Fillapex and AH 26. Madani ZS; Sefidgar SA; Rashed Mohasel A; Zabihi E; Mesgarani A; Bijani A; Miri SS Minerva Stomatol; 2014; 63(7-8):267-72. PubMed ID: 25299361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Cytocompatibility, bioactive potential and antimicrobial activity of an experimental calcium silicate-based endodontic sealer. Zordan-Bronzel CL; Tanomaru-Filho M; Rodrigues EM; Chávez-Andrade GM; Faria G; Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM Int Endod J; 2019 Jul; 52(7):979-986. PubMed ID: 30702145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparison of the Antibacterial Effect of AH26, Adseal and Beta RCS Root Canal Sealers against Ghabraei S; Assadian H; Razmi H; Sheikhrezaei MS; Khedmat S; Chitsaz N; Mohammadi Z; Noori F Front Dent; 2024; 21():5. PubMed ID: 38571896 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]