BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32523375)

  • 41. Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for 2018 FIGO stages IB1, IB2, and IIA1 cervical cancer: a large multicenter study.
    Chen X; Duan H; Liu P; Lin L; Ni Y; Li D; Dai E; Zhan X; Li P; Huo Z; Bin X; Lang J; Chen C
    Ann Transl Med; 2022 Jan; 10(2):121. PubMed ID: 35282114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Clinical analysis of 32 cases with neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix in early-stage disease].
    Wang Z; Wu L; Yao H; Sun Y; Li X; Li B; Zhang R; Ma S; Huang M
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Mar; 50(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 26268410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Overexpression of cyclooxygenase-2 is associated with a poor prognosis in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with radiation and concurrent chemotherapy.
    Kim YB; Kim GE; Cho NH; Pyo HR; Shim SJ; Chang SK; Park HC; Suh CO; Park TK; Kim BS
    Cancer; 2002 Aug; 95(3):531-9. PubMed ID: 12209745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The tumor-stroma ratio is an independent predictor of survival in patients with 2018 FIGO stage IIIC squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix following primary radical surgery.
    Zong L; Zhang Q; Kong Y; Yang F; Zhou Y; Yu S; Wu M; Chen J; Zhang Y; Xiang Y
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):676-681. PubMed ID: 31882242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Effects of pre-chemotherapy hemoglobin and platelet levels in patients with stage Ib2-IIb cervical cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy].
    Wang D; Wu M; Ren T; Wan XR; Feng FZ; Huang HF; Yang JX; Shen K; Xiang Y
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Aug; 47(8):577-81. PubMed ID: 23141176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Assessment of local treatment modalities for FIGO stage IB-IIB cervical cancer: A propensity-score matched analysis based on SEER database.
    Song X; Han Y; Shao Y; Gu W; Pei H; Jiang J
    Sci Rep; 2017 Jun; 7(1):3175. PubMed ID: 28600535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Prognostic value of different metastatic sites for patients with FIGO stage IVB endometrial cancer after surgery: A SEER database analysis.
    Li H; Zhang R; Chen C; Wu C; Lin H; Li J; Lin Z
    J Surg Oncol; 2020 Oct; 122(5):941-948. PubMed ID: 32682330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Patterns of Care and Outcomes for Small Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix: A National Retrospective Analysis of 542 Cases.
    Wharton D; Kim E; Pagan J; Small W; Jaboin J; Ayala-Peacock D
    Adv Radiat Oncol; 2020; 5(3):412-418. PubMed ID: 32529135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Added-value of texture analysis of ADC in predicting the survival of patients with 2018 FIGO stage IIICr cervical cancer treated by concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
    Zhang X; Zhang Q; Guo J; Zhao J; Xie L; Zhang J; An J; Yu X; Zhao X
    Eur J Radiol; 2022 May; 150():110272. PubMed ID: 35334244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Establishment of a Competing Risk Nomogram in Patients with Pulmonary Sarcomatoid Carcinoma.
    Liang Z; Zhang E; Duan L; Weygant N; An G; Hu B; Yao J
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2022; 21():15330338211068960. PubMed ID: 35179409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Prognostic nomogram for predicting survival in patients with high grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: a Surveillance Epidemiology, and End Results database analysis.
    Wu J; Zhang H; Li L; Hu M; Chen L; Wu S; Xu B; Song Q
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Oct; 30(10):1520-1527. PubMed ID: 32839227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Influence of clinicopathological characteristics and comprehensive treatment models on the prognosis of small cell carcinoma of the cervix: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zhang Q; Xiong Y; Ye J; Zhang L; Li L
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0192784. PubMed ID: 29641578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Prognostic factors in definitive radiotherapy of uterine cervical cancer.
    Yalman D; Aras AB; Ozkök S; Duransoy A; Celik OK; Ozsaran Z; Haydaroğlu A
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2003; 24(3-4):309-14. PubMed ID: 12807246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Prognostic analysis of stage Ⅰb2 andⅡa2 cervical squamous cancer without high risk factors treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and radical hysterectomy].
    Li PP; Li B; Wang YT; Liu SH; Zhang YN; Zhang R; Bai P; Li XG; Wu LY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Apr; 53(4):248-256. PubMed ID: 29747270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of the prognoses of FIGO stage I to stage II adenosquamous carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with radical hysterectomy.
    Mabuchi S; Okazawa M; Kinose Y; Matsuo K; Fujiwara M; Suzuki O; Morii E; Kamiura S; Ogawa K; Kimura T
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Oct; 22(8):1389-97. PubMed ID: 22976497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
    Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Magnetic resonance imaging-based validation of the 2018 FIGO staging system in patients treated with definitive radiotherapy for locally advanced cervix cancer.
    Kim J; Cho Y; Kim N; Chung SY; Kim JW; Lee IJ; Kim YB
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Mar; 160(3):735-741. PubMed ID: 33358037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The prognosis of women with stage IB1-IIB node-positive cervical carcinoma after radical surgery.
    Cheng X; Cai S; Li Z; Tang M; Xue M; Zang R
    World J Surg Oncol; 2004 Dec; 2():47. PubMed ID: 15606922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Data from small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: FIGO 2018 staging is more accurate than FIGO 2009.
    Zhang Y; Ding J; Hua K
    J Int Med Res; 2022 Jan; 50(1):3000605211067397. PubMed ID: 34986672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Multimodal treatment including hysterectomy improves survival in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: A population-based, propensity score-matched analysis.
    Wu SG; Zhang WW; Sun JY; Li FY; He ZY; Zhou J
    Int J Surg; 2017 Dec; 48():122-127. PubMed ID: 29032160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.