BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32524151)

  • 1. Variability of quantitative measurements of metastatic liver lesions: a multi-radiation-dose-level and multi-reader comparison.
    Ding Y; Marin D; Vernuccio F; Gonzalez F; Williamson HV; Becker HC; Patel BN; Solomon J; Ramirez-Giraldo JC; Samei E; Nelson RC; Meyer M
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Jan; 46(1):226-236. PubMed ID: 32524151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraobserver and interobserver variability in computed tomography size and attenuation measurements in patients with renal cell carcinoma receiving antiangiogenic therapy: implications for alternative response criteria.
    Krajewski KM; Nishino M; Franchetti Y; Ramaiya NH; Van den Abbeele AD; Choueiri TK
    Cancer; 2014 Mar; 120(5):711-21. PubMed ID: 24264883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automated software supported versus manual aorto-iliac diameter measurements in CT angiography of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms: assessment of inter- and intraobserver variation.
    Diehm N; Baumgartner I; Silvestro A; Herrmann P; Triller J; Schmidli J; Do DD; Dinkel HP
    Vasa; 2005 Nov; 34(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 16363281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Suitability of semi-automated tumor response assessment of liver metastases using a dedicated software package.
    Kalkmann J; Ladd SC; de Greiff A; Forsting M; Stattaus J
    Rofo; 2010 Jul; 182(7):581-8. PubMed ID: 20419616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Volumetric measurement of artificial pure ground-glass nodules at low-dose CT: Comparisons between hybrid iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection.
    Sakai N; Yabuuchi H; Kondo M; Kojima T; Nagatomo K; Kawanami S; Kamitani T; Yonezawa M; Nagao M; Honda H
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Dec; 84(12):2654-62. PubMed ID: 26362824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inter-observer reproducibility of semi-automatic tumor diameter measurement and volumetric analysis in patients with lung cancer.
    Dinkel J; Khalilzadeh O; Hintze C; Fabel M; Puderbach M; Eichinger M; Schlemmer HP; Thorn M; Heussel CP; Thomas M; Kauczor HU; Biederer J
    Lung Cancer; 2013 Oct; 82(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 23932487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rapid switching kVp dual energy CT: Value of reconstructed dual energy CT images and organ dose assessment in multiphasic liver CT exams.
    Mahmood U; Horvat N; Horvat JV; Ryan D; Gao Y; Carollo G; DeOcampo R; Do RK; Katz S; Gerst S; Schmidtlein CR; Dauer L; Erdi Y; Mannelli L
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 May; 102():102-108. PubMed ID: 29685522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Linear and volume measurements of pulmonary nodules at different CT dose levels - intrascan and interscan analysis.
    Hein PA; Romano VC; Rogalla P; Klessen C; Lembcke A; Dicken V; Bornemann L; Bauknecht HC
    Rofo; 2009 Jan; 181(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 19085687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interobserver and intraobserver variability of RECIST assessment in ovarian cancer.
    Krasovitsky M; Lee YC; Sim HW; Chawla T; Moore H; Moses D; Baker L; Mandel C; Kielar A; Hartery A; O'Malley M; Friedlander M; Oza AM; Wang L; Lheureux S; Wilson M
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2022 May; 32(5):656-661. PubMed ID: 35379690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of lung nodule margin on volume- and diameter-based reader variability in CT lung cancer screening.
    Han D; Heuvelmans MA; Vliegenthart R; Rook M; Dorrius MD; de Jonge GJ; Walter JE; van Ooijen PMA; de Koning HJ; Oudkerk M
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 91(1090):20170405. PubMed ID: 28972803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Liver lesion segmentation in MSCT: effect of slice thickness on segmentation quality, measurement precision and interobserver variability.
    Puesken M; Buerke B; Fortkamp R; Koch R; Seifarth H; Heindel W; Wessling J
    Rofo; 2011 Apr; 183(4):372-80. PubMed ID: 21246480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Volumetric evaluation of hepatic tumors: multi-vendor, multi-reader liver phantom study.
    Lubner MG; Dustin Pooler B; del Rio AM; Durkee B; Pickhardt PJ
    Abdom Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(3):488-96. PubMed ID: 24492936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two-stage deep learning model for fully automated pancreas segmentation on computed tomography: Comparison with intra-reader and inter-reader reliability at full and reduced radiation dose on an external dataset.
    Panda A; Korfiatis P; Suman G; Garg SK; Polley EC; Singh DP; Chari ST; Goenka AH
    Med Phys; 2021 May; 48(5):2468-2481. PubMed ID: 33595105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reproducibility of semi-automatic coronary plaque quantification in coronary CT angiography with sub-mSv radiation dose.
    Øvrehus KA; Schuhbaeck A; Marwan M; Achenbach S; Nørgaard BL; Bøtker HE; Dey D
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 26712694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intra- and interobserver variability in the measurements of abdominal aortic and common iliac artery diameter with computed tomography. The Tromsø study.
    Singh K; Jacobsen BK; Solberg S; Bønaa KH; Kumar S; Bajic R; Arnesen E
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2003 May; 25(5):399-407. PubMed ID: 12713777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are pancreatic IPMN volumes measured on MRI images more reproducible than diameters? An assessment in a large single-institution cohort.
    Pandey P; Pandey A; Varzaneh FN; Ghasabeh MA; Fouladi D; Khoshpouri P; Shao N; Zarghampour M; Hruban RH; Canto M; O'Broin-Lennon AM; Kamel IR
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Jul; 28(7):2790-2800. PubMed ID: 29404774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lung, liver and lymph node metastases in follow-up MSCT: comprehensive volumetric assessment of lesion size changes.
    Wulff AM; Bolte H; Fischer S; Freitag-Wolf S; Soza G; Tietjen C; Biederer J; Heller M; Fabel M
    Rofo; 2012 Sep; 184(9):820-8. PubMed ID: 22872601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Semi-automated quantification of hepatic lesions in a phantom.
    Keil S; Plumhans C; Behrendt FF; Stanzel S; Suehling M; Mühlenbruch G; Mahnken AH; Günther RW; Das M
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Feb; 44(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 19104439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. CT colonography: automated measurement of colonic polyps compared with manual techniques--human in vitro study.
    Taylor SA; Slater A; Halligan S; Honeyfield L; Roddie ME; Demeshski J; Amin H; Burling D
    Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 17105850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hepatic tumors: region-of-interest versus volumetric analysis for quantification of attenuation at CT.
    Chalian H; Tochetto SM; Töre HG; Rezai P; Yaghmai V
    Radiology; 2012 Mar; 262(3):853-61. PubMed ID: 22357887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.