These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32524797)

  • 21. Presenting research reflexivity in your PhD thesis.
    Davis D
    Nurse Res; 2020 Sep; 28(3):37-43. PubMed ID: 32700478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [The mixed design in nursing sciences or when a question of research calls for qualitative and quantitative strategies].
    Bourgault P; Gallagher F; Michaud C; Saint-Cyr-Tribble D
    Rech Soins Infirm; 2010 Dec; (103):20-8. PubMed ID: 21322192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Validity, trustworthiness and rigour: quality and the idea of qualitative research.
    Rolfe G
    J Adv Nurs; 2006 Feb; 53(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 16441535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mixed methods research for the novice researcher.
    Giddings LS; Grant BM
    Contemp Nurse; 2006 Oct; 23(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 17083315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Qualitative research sampling: the very real complexities.
    Tuckett AG
    Nurse Res; 2004; 12(1):47-61. PubMed ID: 15493214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Using mixed methods in health services research: A review of the literature and case study.
    de Haan M; van Eijk-Hustings Y; Vrijhoef HJ
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2021 Apr; 26(2):141-147. PubMed ID: 32957813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Using mixed methods in cardiovascular nursing research: Answering the why, the how, and the what's next.
    Dickson VV; Page SD
    Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2021 Feb; 20(1):82-89. PubMed ID: 33570592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A step-by-step approach to developing scales for survey research.
    Younas A; Porr C
    Nurse Res; 2018 Dec; 26(3):14-19. PubMed ID: 30456936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Implementation Science Research Project Appraisal Criteria (ImpResPAC) tool: a study protocol.
    Sweetnam C; Goulding L; Davis RE; Khadjesari Z; Boaz A; Healey A; Sevdalis N; Bakolis I; Hull L
    BMJ Open; 2022 Dec; 12(12):e061209. PubMed ID: 36526311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Case study: a bridge across the paradigms.
    Luck L; Jackson D; Usher K
    Nurs Inq; 2006 Jun; 13(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 16700753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Enhancing rigour in qualitative health research: exploring subjectivity through Peshkin's I's.
    Bradbury-Jones C
    J Adv Nurs; 2007 Aug; 59(3):290-8. PubMed ID: 17590210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Methodological issues associated with group intervention research.
    Murphy SA; Johnson LC
    Arch Psychiatr Nurs; 2006 Dec; 20(6):276-81. PubMed ID: 17145455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reconceptualizing rigour: the case for reflexivity.
    Koch T; Harrington A
    J Adv Nurs; 1998 Oct; 28(4):882-90. PubMed ID: 9829678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Application of four-dimension criteria to assess rigour of qualitative research in emergency medicine.
    Forero R; Nahidi S; De Costa J; Mohsin M; Fitzgerald G; Gibson N; McCarthy S; Aboagye-Sarfo P
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Feb; 18(1):120. PubMed ID: 29454350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing.
    Keeney S; Hasson F; McKenna HP
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2001 Apr; 38(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 11223060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Practical considerations in case study research: the relationship between methodology and process.
    McDonnell A; Lloyd Jones M; Read S
    J Adv Nurs; 2000 Aug; 32(2):383-90. PubMed ID: 10964186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Data integration using the building technique in mixed-methods instrument development: Methodological discussion.
    Younas A; Rasheed SP; Zeb H; Inayat S
    J Adv Nurs; 2020 Aug; 76(8):2198-2207. PubMed ID: 32400896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Collecting qualitative data: part I: Journal as a method: experience, rationale and limitations.
    Tuckett AG; Stewart DE
    Contemp Nurse; 2003 Dec-2004 Feb; 16(1-2):104-13. PubMed ID: 14994901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The strengths and weaknesses of quantitative and qualitative research: what method for nursing?
    Carr LT
    J Adv Nurs; 1994 Oct; 20(4):716-21. PubMed ID: 7822608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.