These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32525721)

  • 1. Do's and Don'ts for a Good Reviewer of Scientific Papers: A Beginner's Brief Decalogue.
    Lazarides MK; Georgiadis GS; Papanas N
    Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2020 Sep; 19(3):227-229. PubMed ID: 32525721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The rites of writing papers: steps to successful publishing for psychiatrists.
    Brakoulias V; Macfarlane MD; Looi JC
    Australas Psychiatry; 2015 Feb; 23(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 25469001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Publication of chemical research: do we need ethical standards?
    Karlberg B
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2007 Jan; 387(1):129-30. PubMed ID: 17111106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The do's and don't's of submitting scientific papers.
    Walsh PJ; Mommsen TP; Nilsson GE
    Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol; 2009 Mar; 152(3):203-4. PubMed ID: 19146976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review: issues in physical medicine and rehabilitation.
    Wagner AK; Boninger ML; Levy C; Chan L; Gater D; Kirby RL
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Oct; 82(10):790-802. PubMed ID: 14508411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Write a scientific paper (WASP): Editor's perspective of submissions and dealing with editors.
    Cuschieri S; Vassallo J
    Early Hum Dev; 2019 Feb; 129():93-95. PubMed ID: 30578111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is Biomedical Research Protected from Predatory Reviewers?
    Al-Khatib A; Teixeira da Silva JA
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Feb; 25(1):293-321. PubMed ID: 28905258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. E-mail netiquette for the medical practice employee: 50 do's and don'ts.
    Hills L
    J Med Pract Manage; 2011; 27(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 22111286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Guidelines: The Do's, Don'ts and Don't Knows of Creating Open Educational Resources.
    Khalid F; Wu M; Ting DK; Thoma B; Haas MRC; Brenner MJ; Yilmaz Y; Kim YM; Chan TM
    Perspect Med Educ; 2023; 12(1):25-40. PubMed ID: 36908747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Practical Roadmap for Writing of Medical Scientific Publications.
    Ugarte-Gil MF; Alarcón GS
    J Clin Rheumatol; 2019 Oct; 25(7):314-317. PubMed ID: 30520825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of dedicated methodology and statistical reviewers for peer review: a content analysis of comments to authors made by methodology and regular reviewers.
    Day FC; Schriger DL; Todd C; Wears RL
    Ann Emerg Med; 2002 Sep; 40(3):329-33. PubMed ID: 12192359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Research: Why and how to write a paper?
    Light RW
    Rev Clin Esp (Barc); 2015 Oct; 215(7):401-4. PubMed ID: 26059689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [How to write and publish a scientific article in stomatology].
    Gao XJ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Dec; 52(12):758-761. PubMed ID: 29275572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Write a scientific paper (WASP) - a career-critical skill.
    Grech V; Cuschieri S
    Early Hum Dev; 2018 Feb; 117():96-97. PubMed ID: 29361328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Soaring science publications in Covid-19: Separate the wheat from the chaff].
    Corvol P
    Med Sci (Paris); 2021 Apr; 37(4):315-316. PubMed ID: 33908844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Role of the manuscript reviewer.
    Peh WC; Ng KH
    Singapore Med J; 2009 Oct; 50(10):931-3; quiz 934. PubMed ID: 19907880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scientific Publishing in Biomedicine: Revising a Peer-reviewed Manuscript.
    Bahadoran Z; Mirmiran P; Kashfi K; Ghasemi A
    Int J Endocrinol Metab; 2022 Jan; 20(1):e120366. PubMed ID: 35432554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rewarding the quantity of peer review could harm biomedical research.
    Al-Khatib A; Teixeira da Silva JA
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2019 Jun; 29(2):020201. PubMed ID: 31015781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of revealing authors' conflicts of interests in peer review: randomized controlled trial.
    John LK; Loewenstein G; Marder A; Callaham ML
    BMJ; 2019 Nov; 367():l5896. PubMed ID: 31694810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prepublication Communication of Research Results.
    Adams MJ; Harris RN; Grant EHC; Gray MJ; Camille Hopkins M; Iverson SA; Likens R; Mandica M; Olson DH; Shepack A; Waddle H
    Ecohealth; 2018 Sep; 15(3):478-481. PubMed ID: 30088185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.