101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32527649)
1. Pulse-echo Ultrasound Identifies Caucasian and Hispanic Women at Risk for Osteoporosis.
Lewiecki EM
J Clin Densitom; 2021; 24(2):175-182. PubMed ID: 32527649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of hip osteoporosis by DXA using a novel pulse-echo ultrasound device.
Schousboe JT; Riekkinen O; Karjalainen J
Osteoporos Int; 2017 Jan; 28(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 27492435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New method for point-of-care osteoporosis screening and diagnostics.
Karjalainen JP; Riekkinen O; Töyräs J; Jurvelin JS; Kröger H
Osteoporos Int; 2016 Mar; 27(3):971-977. PubMed ID: 26556741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pulse-echo ultrasound method for detection of post-menopausal women with osteoporotic BMD.
Karjalainen JP; Riekkinen O; Kröger H
Osteoporos Int; 2018 May; 29(5):1193-1199. PubMed ID: 29460101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multi-site bone ultrasound measurements in elderly women with and without previous hip fractures.
Karjalainen JP; Riekkinen O; Töyräs J; Hakulinen M; Kröger H; Rikkonen T; Salovaara K; Jurvelin JS
Osteoporos Int; 2012 Apr; 23(4):1287-95. PubMed ID: 21656263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of hip and chest radiographs in osteoporotic evaluation among south Indian women population: a comparative scenario with DXA.
Kumar DA; Anburajan M
J Endocrinol Invest; 2014 May; 37(5):429-40. PubMed ID: 24737214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Device-specific thresholds to diagnose osteoporosis at the proximal femur: an approach to interpreting peripheral bone measurements in clinical practice.
Clowes JA; Peel NF; Eastell R
Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(9):1293-302. PubMed ID: 16810454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can the WHO criteria for diagnosing osteoporosis be applied to calcaneal quantitative ultrasound?
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(4):321-30. PubMed ID: 10928222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Panoramic-based mandibular indices in relation to mandibular bone mineral density and skeletal status assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative ultrasound.
Drozdzowska B; Pluskiewicz W; Tarnawska B
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Nov; 31(6):361-7. PubMed ID: 12424634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A list of device-specific thresholds for the clinical interpretation of peripheral x-ray absorptiometry examinations.
Blake GM; Chinn DJ; Steel SA; Patel R; Panayiotou E; Thorpe J; Fordham JN;
Osteoporos Int; 2005 Dec; 16(12):2149-56. PubMed ID: 16228104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of OSTA index and KKOS scoring system for prediction of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women who attended Siriraj Menopause Clinic.
Panichyawat N; Tanmahasamut P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2012 Nov; 95(11):1365-71. PubMed ID: 23252200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prevalence of Osteoporosis in Women in Buenos Aires Based on Bone Mineral Density at the Lumbar Spine and Femur.
Mautalen C; Schianchi A; Sigal D; Gianetti G; Vidan V; Bagur A; González D; Mastaglia S; Oliveri B
J Clin Densitom; 2016 Oct; 19(4):471-476. PubMed ID: 26948141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identifying postmenopausal women with osteoporosis by calcaneal ultrasound, metacarpal digital X-ray radiogrammetry and phalangeal radiographic absorptiometry: a comparative study.
Boonen S; Nijs J; Borghs H; Peeters H; Vanderschueren D; Luyten FP
Osteoporos Int; 2005 Jan; 16(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 15197540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How does quantitative ultrasound compare to dual X-ray absorptiometry at various skeletal sites in relation to the WHO diagnosis categories?
Jørgensen HL; Warming L; Bjarnason NH; Andersen PB; Hassager C
Clin Physiol; 2001 Jan; 21(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 11168297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the simple calculated osteoporosis risk estimation (SCORE) in older Caucasian women: the Rancho Bernardo study.
Von Mühlen D; Visby Lunde A; Barrett-Connor E; Bettencourt R
Osteoporos Int; 1999; 10(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 10501784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of a Swedish T-score reference population for women causes a two-fold increase in the amount of postmenopausal Swedish patients that fulfill the WHO criteria for osteoporosis.
Ribom EL; Ljunggren O; Mallmin H
J Clin Densitom; 2008; 11(3):404-11. PubMed ID: 18280191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can radial bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound measurements reduce the number of women who need axial density skeletal assessment?
Damilakis J; Papadokostakis G; Perisinakis K; Hadjipavlou A; Gourtsoyiannis N
Osteoporos Int; 2003 Aug; 14(8):688-93. PubMed ID: 12897977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contact quantitative ultrasound: an evaluation of precision, fracture discrimination, age-related bone loss and applicability of the WHO criteria.
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 1999; 10(6):441-9. PubMed ID: 10663343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Optimal Cut-Points for Weight and Non-Weight Quantitative Ultrasound of the Calcaneus to Screen Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women.
Vallipakorn SA; Vallipakorn O; Sophonsritsuk A; Jirapinyo M; Sritara C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2016 Mar; 99(3):249-56. PubMed ID: 27276734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does the combination of quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry improve fracture discrimination?
Frost ML; Blake GM; Fogelman I
Osteoporos Int; 2001; 12(6):471-7. PubMed ID: 11446563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
