These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. A review of the scientific evidence for biofilms in wounds. Percival SL; Hill KE; Williams DW; Hooper SJ; Thomas DW; Costerton JW Wound Repair Regen; 2012; 20(5):647-57. PubMed ID: 22985037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Detection of Biofilm in Wounds as an Early Indicator for Risk for Tissue Infection and Wound Chronicity. Vyas KS; Wong LK Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Jan; 76(1):127-31. PubMed ID: 25774966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Human Skin In Vitro Colonization Model for a Skin Wound Infected by Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm. Chapman JE; Olson ME Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2341():153-159. PubMed ID: 34264471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Nanocoatings for Chronic Wound Repair-Modulation of Microbial Colonization and Biofilm Formation. Mihai MM; Preda M; Lungu I; Gestal MC; Popa MI; Holban AM Int J Mol Sci; 2018 Apr; 19(4):. PubMed ID: 29649179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. In vitro activity of the Qoustic Wound Therapy System against planktonic and biofilm bacteria. Karau MJ; Piper KE; Steckelberg JM; Kavros SJ; Patel R Adv Skin Wound Care; 2010 Jul; 23(7):316-20. PubMed ID: 20562540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Dual role of iodine, silver, chlorhexidine and octenidine as antimicrobial and antiprotease agents. Pavlík V; Sojka M; Mazúrová M; Velebný V PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0211055. PubMed ID: 30703114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparative analysis of single-species and polybacterial wound biofilms using a quantitative, in vivo, rabbit ear model. Seth AK; Geringer MR; Hong SJ; Leung KP; Galiano RD; Mustoe TA PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e42897. PubMed ID: 22905182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The importance of a multifaceted approach to characterizing the microbial flora of chronic wounds. Han A; Zenilman JM; Melendez JH; Shirtliff ME; Agostinho A; James G; Stewart PS; Mongodin EF; Rao D; Rickard AH; Lazarus GS Wound Repair Regen; 2011; 19(5):532-41. PubMed ID: 22092791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A review of studies that examine the impact of infection on the normal wound-healing process. Penhallow K J Wound Care; 2005 Mar; 14(3):123-6. PubMed ID: 15779643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A surfactant-based wound dressing can reduce bacterial biofilms in a porcine skin explant model. Yang Q; Larose C; Della Porta AC; Schultz GS; Gibson DJ Int Wound J; 2017 Apr; 14(2):408-413. PubMed ID: 27212453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Bacterial biofilm and chronic wound infection]. Yu JA; Gao XX Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 35(12):842-847. PubMed ID: 31877605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Bacterial floras and biofilms of malignant wounds associated with breast cancers. Fromantin I; Seyer D; Watson S; Rollot F; Elard J; Escande MC; De Rycke Y; Kriegel I; Larreta Garde V J Clin Microbiol; 2013 Oct; 51(10):3368-73. PubMed ID: 23926169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Challenges with Wound Infection Models in Drug Development. Shukla SK; Sharma AK; Gupta V; Kalonia A; Shaw P Curr Drug Targets; 2020; 21(13):1301-1312. PubMed ID: 32116189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Research advances on the formation mechanism and diagnosis of bacteria biofilms in chronic wounds]. Liu J; Liu Y Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2021 Jul; 37(7):692-696. PubMed ID: 34304413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]