These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32531660)

  • 21. Material-specific properties applied to an environmental risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials - implications on grouping and read-across concepts.
    Wigger H; Nowack B
    Nanotoxicology; 2019 Jun; 13(5):623-643. PubMed ID: 30727799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Environmental risk assessment of engineered nano-SiO
    Wang Y; Nowack B
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2018 May; 37(5):1387-1395. PubMed ID: 29315795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Importance of exposure dynamics of metal-based nano-ZnO, -Cu and -Pb governing the metabolic potential of soil bacterial communities.
    Zhai Y; Hunting ER; Wouterse M; Peijnenburg WJGM; Vijver MG
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2017 Nov; 145():349-358. PubMed ID: 28759764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Leaching of nano-ZnO in municipal solid waste.
    Sakallioglu T; Bakirdoven M; Temizel I; Demirel B; Copty NK; Onay TT; Uyguner Demirel CS; Karanfil T
    J Hazard Mater; 2016 Nov; 317():319-326. PubMed ID: 27318728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The antibacterial effects of engineered nanomaterials: implications for wastewater treatment plants.
    Musee N; Thwala M; Nota N
    J Environ Monit; 2011 May; 13(5):1164-83. PubMed ID: 21505709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessing the Risk of Engineered Nanomaterials in the Environment: Development and Application of the nanoFate Model.
    Garner KL; Suh S; Keller AA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 May; 51(10):5541-5551. PubMed ID: 28443660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In silico analysis of nanomaterials hazard and risk.
    Cohen Y; Rallo R; Liu R; Liu HH
    Acc Chem Res; 2013 Mar; 46(3):802-12. PubMed ID: 23138971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Size-Specific, Dynamic, Probabilistic Material Flow Analysis of Titanium Dioxide Releases into the Environment.
    Zheng Y; Nowack B
    Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Feb; 55(4):2392-2402. PubMed ID: 33541069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An eclectic approach to monitor and manage the disposal of carbon nanotubes.
    Moodley KG; Singh S; Naidoo DR; Kanny K
    Environ Monit Assess; 2021 Jul; 193(8):478. PubMed ID: 34235624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Engineered nanomaterials in rivers--exposure scenarios for Switzerland at high spatial and temporal resolution.
    Gottschalk F; Ort C; Scholz RW; Nowack B
    Environ Pollut; 2011 Dec; 159(12):3439-45. PubMed ID: 21890252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Lessons learned: Are engineered nanomaterials toxic to terrestrial plants?
    Reddy PVL; Hernandez-Viezcas JA; Peralta-Videa JR; Gardea-Torresdey JL
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Oct; 568():470-479. PubMed ID: 27314900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Chemical interactions between Nano-ZnO and Nano-TiO2 in a natural aqueous medium.
    Tong T; Fang K; Thomas SA; Kelly JJ; Gray KA; Gaillard JF
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 48(14):7924-32. PubMed ID: 24918623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Environmental and health effects of nanomaterials in nanotextiles and façade coatings.
    Som C; Wick P; Krug H; Nowack B
    Environ Int; 2011 Aug; 37(6):1131-42. PubMed ID: 21397331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dynamic Model for the Stocks and Release Flows of Engineered Nanomaterials.
    Song R; Qin Y; Suh S; Keller AA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 51(21):12424-12433. PubMed ID: 29022708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of nano-ZnO on biogas generation from simulated landfills.
    Temizel İ; Emadian SM; Di Addario M; Onay TT; Demirel B; Copty NK; Karanfil T
    Waste Manag; 2017 May; 63():18-26. PubMed ID: 28126371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A review of the detection, fate and effects of engineered nanomaterials in wastewater treatment plants.
    Neale PA; Jämting ÅK; Escher BI; Herrmann J
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(7):1440-53. PubMed ID: 24135091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Nanowastes treatment in environmental media.
    Kim Y
    Environ Health Toxicol; 2014; 29():e2014015. PubMed ID: 25381912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comprehensive probabilistic modelling of environmental emissions of engineered nanomaterials.
    Sun TY; Gottschalk F; Hungerbühler K; Nowack B
    Environ Pollut; 2014 Feb; 185():69-76. PubMed ID: 24220022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of dominant material properties on the stability and transport of TiO2 nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes in aquatic environments: from synthesis to fate.
    Liu X; Chen G; Keller AA; Su C
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2013 Jan; 15(1):169-89. PubMed ID: 24592435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Distinguishing Engineered TiO
    Bland GD; Battifarano M; Pradas Del Real AE; Sarret G; Lowry GV
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Mar; 56(5):2990-3001. PubMed ID: 35133134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.