These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32531726)
1. Feasibility of reusing routinely recorded data to monitor the safe preparation and administration of injectable medication: A multicenter cross-sectional study. Schutijser BCFM; Klopotowska JE; Jongerden IP; Wagner C; de Bruijne MC Int J Med Inform; 2020 Sep; 141():104201. PubMed ID: 32531726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Data extraction from electronic health records (EHRs) for quality measurement of the physical therapy process: comparison between EHR data and survey data. Scholte M; van Dulmen SA; Neeleman-Van der Steen CW; van der Wees PJ; Nijhuis-van der Sanden MW; Braspenning J BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2016 Nov; 16(1):141. PubMed ID: 27825333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nurse compliance with a protocol for safe injectable medication administration: comparison of two multicentre observational studies. Schutijser B; Klopotowska JE; Jongerden I; Spreeuwenberg P; Wagner C; de Bruijne M BMJ Open; 2018 Jan; 8(1):e019648. PubMed ID: 29306893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Usability problems do not heal by themselves: National survey on physicians' experiences with EHRs in Finland. Kaipio J; Lääveri T; Hyppönen H; Vainiomäki S; Reponen J; Kushniruk A; Borycki E; Vänskä J Int J Med Inform; 2017 Jan; 97():266-281. PubMed ID: 27919385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Common data elements for secondary use of electronic health record data for clinical trial execution and serious adverse event reporting. Bruland P; McGilchrist M; Zapletal E; Acosta D; Proeve J; Askin S; Ganslandt T; Doods J; Dugas M BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):159. PubMed ID: 27875988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature. Häyrinen K; Saranto K; Nykänen P Int J Med Inform; 2008 May; 77(5):291-304. PubMed ID: 17951106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Feasibility of 48 quality indicators in ambulatory care in Germany: a cross-sectional observational study. de Cruppé W; Kleudgen S; Diel F; Burgdorf F; Geraedts M Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2015; 109(9-10):682-94. PubMed ID: 26699257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated Electronic Health Record to Electronic Data Capture Transfer in Clinical Studies in the German Health Care System: Feasibility Study and Gap Analysis. Mueller C; Herrmann P; Cichos S; Remes B; Junker E; Hastenteufel T; Mundhenke M J Med Internet Res; 2023 Aug; 25():e47958. PubMed ID: 37540555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing and comparing the usability of Chinese EHRs used in two Peking University hospitals to EHRs used in the US: A method of RUA. Xu L; Wen D; Zhang X; Lei J Int J Med Inform; 2016 May; 89():32-42. PubMed ID: 26980357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. National Trends in the Safety Performance of Electronic Health Record Systems From 2009 to 2018. Classen DC; Holmgren AJ; Co Z; Newmark LP; Seger D; Danforth M; Bates DW JAMA Netw Open; 2020 May; 3(5):e205547. PubMed ID: 32469412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electronic Health Record Implementations and Insufficient Training Endanger Nurses' Well-being: Cross-sectional Survey Study. Heponiemi T; Gluschkoff K; Vehko T; Kaihlanen AM; Saranto K; Nissinen S; Nadav J; Kujala S J Med Internet Res; 2021 Dec; 23(12):e27096. PubMed ID: 34941546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Motivations and barriers to implementing electronic health records and ED information systems in Japan. Inokuchi R; Sato H; Nakamura K; Aoki Y; Shinohara K; Gunshin M; Matsubara T; Kitsuta Y; Yahagi N; Nakajima S Am J Emerg Med; 2014 Jul; 32(7):725-30. PubMed ID: 24792932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utility of Electronic Medical Records in Community Rheumatology Practice for Assessing Quality of Care Indicators for Gout: A Feasibility Study. Estrada A; Tsao NW; Howren A; Esdaile JM; Shojania K; De Vera MA J Clin Rheumatol; 2018 Mar; 24(2):75-79. PubMed ID: 29232325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Barriers and facilitators to using electronic healthcare records in Jordanian hospitals from the nurses' perspective: A national survey. Al-Rawajfah O; Tubaishat A Inform Health Soc Care; 2019 Jan; 44(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 28829654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A survey of student nurses' and midwives' experiences of learning to use electronic health record systems in practice. Baillie L; Chadwick S; Mann R; Brooke-Read M Nurse Educ Pract; 2013 Sep; 13(5):437-41. PubMed ID: 23140800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Calculations of Financial Incentives for Providers in a Pay-for-Performance Program: Manual Review Versus Data From Structured Fields in Electronic Health Records. Urech TH; Woodard LD; Virani SS; Dudley RA; Lutschg MZ; Petersen LA Med Care; 2015 Oct; 53(10):901-7. PubMed ID: 26340661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electronic Health Record Adoption and Nurse Reports of Usability and Quality of Care: The Role of Work Environment. Kutney-Lee A; Sloane DM; Bowles KH; Burns LR; Aiken LH Appl Clin Inform; 2019 Jan; 10(1):129-139. PubMed ID: 30786302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does adoption of electronic health records improve the quality of care management in France? Results from the French e-SI (PREPS-SIPS) study. Plantier M; Havet N; Durand T; Caquot N; Amaz C; Biron P; Philip I; Perrier L Int J Med Inform; 2017 Jun; 102():156-165. PubMed ID: 28495344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Safe use of electronic health records and health information technology systems: trust but verify. Denham CR; Classen DC; Swenson SJ; Henderson MJ; Zeltner T; Bates DW J Patient Saf; 2013 Dec; 9(4):177-89. PubMed ID: 24257062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]