These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32534902)

  • 1. How do different kinds of incidental emotions influence risk decision making?
    Yang Q; Zhou S; Gu R; Wu Y
    Biol Psychol; 2020 Jul; 154():107920. PubMed ID: 32534902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incidental emotions influence risk preference and outcome evaluation.
    Zhao D; Gu R; Tang P; Yang Q; Luo YJ
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Oct; 53(10):1542-51. PubMed ID: 27354122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differentiating the influence of incidental anger and fear on risk decision-making.
    Yang Q; Zhao D; Wu Y; Tang P; Gu R; Luo YJ
    Physiol Behav; 2018 Feb; 184():179-188. PubMed ID: 29196018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The interaction between state and dispositional emotions in decision making: An ERP study.
    Wang Y; Gu R; Luo YJ; Zhou C
    Biol Psychol; 2017 Feb; 123():126-135. PubMed ID: 27887980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incidental positive emotion modulates neural response to outcome valence in a monetarily rewarded gambling task.
    Bandyopadhyay D; Pammi VSC; Srinivasan N
    Prog Brain Res; 2019; 247():219-251. PubMed ID: 31196435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How does cognitive reappraisal affect the response to gains and losses?
    Yang Q; Gu R; Tang P; Luo YJ
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Nov; 50(11):1094-103. PubMed ID: 23889144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do incidental positive emotions induce more optimistic expectations of decision outcomes? An empirical study from the perspective of event-related potential.
    Zhao R; Zhou L
    Brain Behav; 2024 Apr; 14(4):e3491. PubMed ID: 38641887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implicit emotion regulation affects outcome evaluation.
    Yang Q; Tang P; Gu R; Luo W; Luo YJ
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2015 Jun; 10(6):824-31. PubMed ID: 25332404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Regulatory effect of implicit acceptance during outcome evaluation: The temporal dynamics in an event-related potential study.
    Yuan J; Long Q; Li X; Deng Z; Ma B; Chen S; Yang J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Jul; 141():37-44. PubMed ID: 31071358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The neural dynamics underlying the interpersonal effects of emotional expression on decision making.
    Chen X; Zheng T; Han L; Chang Y; Luo Y
    Sci Rep; 2017 Apr; 7():46651. PubMed ID: 28425491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Your happy expressions encourage me to take risks: ERP evidence from an interpersonal gambling game.
    Yuan H; Zheng T; Chang Y; Luo Y; Chen X
    Biol Psychol; 2021 Nov; 166():108205. PubMed ID: 34653548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Active vs. computer-based passive decision-making leads to discrepancies in outcome evaluation: evidence from self-reported emotional experience and brain activity.
    Tao R; Zhang C; Zhao H; Xu S
    Cereb Cortex; 2023 Oct; 33(20):10676-10685. PubMed ID: 37689832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Aging and risky decision-making: New ERP evidence from the Iowa Gambling Task.
    Di Rosa E; Mapelli D; Arcara G; Amodio P; Tamburin S; Schiff S
    Neurosci Lett; 2017 Feb; 640():93-98. PubMed ID: 28093302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Time Pressure Affects the Risk Preference and Outcome Evaluation.
    Lin CJ; Jia H
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Feb; 20(4):. PubMed ID: 36833899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How do decision makers evaluate advice from advisors with happy and angry expressions? A behavioural and ERP study.
    Du X; Ren Y; Yuan X
    Cogn Emot; 2023; 37(4):852-862. PubMed ID: 37132215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Narcissism and risky decisions: a neurophysiological approach.
    Yang Z; Sedikides C; Gu R; Luo YLL; Wang Y; Cai H
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2018 Sep; 13(8):889-897. PubMed ID: 30016494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Deficient inhibition of return for emotional faces in depression.
    Dai Q; Feng Z
    Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 2009 Aug; 33(6):921-32. PubMed ID: 19394388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prefrontal activation in suicide attempters during decision making with emotional feedback.
    Alacreu-Crespo A; Olié E; Le Bars E; Cyprien F; Deverdun J; Courtet P
    Transl Psychiatry; 2020 Sep; 10(1):313. PubMed ID: 32948747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of emotional context congruency on decision making under ambiguity.
    Aïte A; Borst G; Moutier S; Varescon I; Brown I; Houdé O; Cassotti M
    Emotion; 2013 Apr; 13(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 23398587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A negative emotional context disrupts the framing effect on outcome evaluation in decision making under uncertainty: An ERP study.
    Tao R; Zhang C; Zhao H; Xu Y; Han T; Dai M; Zheng K; Zhang N; Xu S
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Apr; 60(4):e14207. PubMed ID: 36322605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.