417 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32535775)
21. Hand-wrist, knee, and foot-ankle dosimetry and image quality measurements of a novel extremity imaging unit providing CBCT and 2D imaging options.
Ludlow JB
Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):4955-4963. PubMed ID: 30229941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Ultra-low-dose lung multidetector computed tomography in children - Approaching 0.2 millisievert.
Tschauner S; Zellner M; Pistorius S; Gnannt R; Schraner T; Kellenberger CJ
Eur J Radiol; 2021 Jun; 139():109699. PubMed ID: 33932715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Relationship between cone-beam CT technique and diagnostic usefulness in patients undergoing embolotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Gutierrez D; Gurajala RK; Kapoor B; Setser R; Karuppasamy K
Clin Radiol; 2017 Nov; 72(11):993.e1-993.e6. PubMed ID: 28705329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Initial Clinical Experience With Extremity Cone-Beam CT of the Foot and Ankle in Pediatric Patients.
Pugmire BS; Shailam R; Sagar P; Liu B; Li X; Palmer WE; Huang AJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Feb; 206(2):431-5. PubMed ID: 26797374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of radiation dose and image quality between flat panel computed tomography and multidetector computed tomography in a hybrid CT-angiography suite.
Jones AK; Odisio BC
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):121-127. PubMed ID: 31922349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Estimation of effective doses from MDCT and CBCT imaging of extremities.
Ludlow JB; Johnson BK; Ivanovic M
J Radiol Prot; 2018 Dec; 38(4):1371-1383. PubMed ID: 30255853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Diagnostic usefulness of cone-beam computed tomography versus multi-detector computed tomography for sinonasal structure evaluation.
Han M; Kim HJ; Choi JW; Park DY; Han JG
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol; 2022 Jun; 7(3):662-670. PubMed ID: 35734052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Radiohistologic Comparison Study of Temporal Bone Specimens After Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Insertion: Is Cone-Beam CT Superior to MDCT?
Burck I; Schneider SV; Balster S; Lehn A; Yel I; Albrecht MH; Helbig S; Stöver T; Kaltenbach B; Vogl TJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Mar; 216(3):752-758. PubMed ID: 33439050
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Real-time respiratory triggered four dimensional cone-beam CT halves imaging dose compared to conventional 4D CBCT.
Cooper BJ; O'Brien RT; Shieh CC; Keall PJ
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Mar; 64(7):07NT01. PubMed ID: 30754038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Gumbel distribution-based technique enables quantitative comparison between streak metal artifacts of multidetector row CT and cone-beam CT: a phantom study.
Nomura Y; Watanabe H; Tomisato H; Kawashima S; Miura M
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2023 Jun; 46(2):801-812. PubMed ID: 37052806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Multi-planar 2.5D U-Net for image quality enhancement of dental cone-beam CT.
Ryu K; Lee C; Han Y; Pang S; Kim YH; Choi C; Jang I; Han SS
PLoS One; 2023; 18(5):e0285608. PubMed ID: 37167217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. 3D cone-beam CT of the ankle using a novel twin robotic X-ray system: Assessment of image quality and radiation dose.
Grunz JP; Kunz AS; Gietzen CH; Weng AM; Veyhl-Wichmann M; Ergün S; Schmitt R; Bley TA; Gassenmaier T
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Oct; 119():108659. PubMed ID: 31520930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Dose and image quality of cone-beam computed tomography as compared with conventional multislice computed tomography in abdominal imaging.
Schegerer AA; Lechel U; Ritter M; Weisser G; Fink C; Brix G
Invest Radiol; 2014 Oct; 49(10):675-84. PubMed ID: 24853071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of Radiation Dose-Equivalent Radiography, Multidetector Computed Tomography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Fractures of Adult Cadaveric Wrists.
Neubauer J; Benndorf M; Reidelbach C; Krauß T; Lampert F; Zajonc H; Kotter E; Langer M; Fiebich M; Goerke SM
PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0164859. PubMed ID: 27788215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Visualisation of passive middle ear implants by cone beam and multi-detector computed tomography: a comparative in vitro study.
Nguyen TD; Kösling S; Mlynski R; Plontke SK
Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4538-4544. PubMed ID: 27027315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Reliability and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography versus conventional multidetector computed tomography for image-guided craniofacial implant planning: An in vitro study.
Dings JP; Verhamme L; Merkx MA; Xi T; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(3):665–672. PubMed ID: 30934042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Dual-energy imaging method to improve the image quality and the accuracy of dose calculation for cone-beam computed tomography.
Men K; Dai J; Chen X; Li M; Zhang K; Huang P
Phys Med; 2017 Apr; 36():110-118. PubMed ID: 28410679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The Role of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography CT Extremity Arthrography in the Preoperative Assessment of Osteoarthritis.
Hamard M; Sans Merce M; Gorican K; Poletti PA; Neroladaki A; Boudabbous S
Tomography; 2023 Nov; 9(6):2134-2147. PubMed ID: 38133071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Novel flat-panel cone-beam CT compared to multi-detector CT for assessment of acute ischemic stroke: A prospective study.
Nicholson P; Cancelliere NM; Bracken J; Hummel E; van Nijnatten F; Withagen P; van de Haar P; Hallacoglu B; van Vlimmeren M; Agid R; Krings T; Mendes Pereira V
Eur J Radiol; 2021 May; 138():109645. PubMed ID: 33725654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dedicated cone-beam CT system for extremity imaging.
Carrino JA; Al Muhit A; Zbijewski W; Thawait GK; Stayman JW; Packard N; Senn R; Yang D; Foos DH; Yorkston J; Siewerdsen JH
Radiology; 2014 Mar; 270(3):816-24. PubMed ID: 24475803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
