BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32536732)

  • 1. An Optimized Bayesian Hierarchical Two-Parameter Logistic Model for Small-Sample Item Calibration.
    König C; Spoden C; Frey A
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 Jun; 44(4):311-326. PubMed ID: 32536732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robustness of the performance of the optimized hierarchical two-parameter logistic IRT model for small-sample item calibration.
    König C; Spoden C; Frey A
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Dec; 55(8):3965-3983. PubMed ID: 36333627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Benefits of the Curious Behavior of Bayesian Hierarchical Item Response Theory Models-An in-Depth Investigation and Bias Correction.
    König C; Alexandrowicz RW
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2024 Mar; 48(1-2):38-56. PubMed ID: 38327609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Hierarchical Multi-Unidimensional IRT Approach for Analyzing Sparse, Multi-Group Data for Integrative Data Analysis.
    Huo Y; de la Torre J; Mun EY; Kim SY; Ray AE; Jiao Y; White HR
    Psychometrika; 2015 Sep; 80(3):834-55. PubMed ID: 25265910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison between pystan and numpyro in Bayesian item response theory: evaluation of agreement of estimated latent parameters and sampling performance.
    Nishio M; Ota E; Matsuo H; Matsunaga T; Miyazaki A; Murakami T
    PeerJ Comput Sci; 2023; 9():e1620. PubMed ID: 37869462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parameter Estimation Accuracy of the Effort-Moderated Item Response Theory Model Under Multiple Assumption Violations.
    Rios JA; Soland J
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Jun; 81(3):569-594. PubMed ID: 33994564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using Auxiliary Item Information in the Item Parameter Estimation of a Graded Response Model for a Small to Medium Sample Size: Empirical Versus Hierarchical Bayes Estimation.
    Naveiras M; Cho SJ
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2023 Nov; 47(7-8):478-495. PubMed ID: 38027461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigating a Weakly Informative Prior for Item Scale Hyperparameters in Hierarchical 3PNO IRT Models.
    Sheng Y
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():123. PubMed ID: 28220096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigating Confidence Intervals of Item Parameters When Some Item Parameters Take Priors in the 2PL and 3PL Models.
    Paek I; Lin Z; Chalmers RP
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2023 Apr; 83(2):375-400. PubMed ID: 36866071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Comparison of ML, WLSMV, and Bayesian Methods for Multilevel Structural Equation Models in Small Samples: A Simulation Study.
    Holtmann J; Koch T; Lochner K; Eid M
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2016; 51(5):661-680. PubMed ID: 27594086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sample Size Requirements for Applying Mixed Polytomous Item Response Models: Results of a Monte Carlo Simulation Study.
    Kutscher T; Eid M; Crayen C
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2494. PubMed ID: 31798490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A hierarchical Bayesian model for calibrating estimates of species divergence times.
    Heath TA
    Syst Biol; 2012 Oct; 61(5):793-809. PubMed ID: 22334343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rasch Model Parameter Estimation in the Presence of a Nonnormal Latent Trait Using a Nonparametric Bayesian Approach.
    Finch H; Edwards JM
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Aug; 76(4):662-684. PubMed ID: 29795882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Categorical Omega With Small Sample Sizes via Bayesian Estimation: An Alternative to Frequentist Estimators.
    Yang Y; Xia Y
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Feb; 79(1):19-39. PubMed ID: 30636780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Note on the Conversion of Item Parameters Standard Errors.
    Wang C; Zhang X
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(2):307-321. PubMed ID: 30574796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterizing Sources of Uncertainty in IRT Scale Scores.
    Yang JS; Hansen M; Cai L
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2012 Apr; 72(2):264-290. PubMed ID: 23049139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Linking of Rasch-Scaled Tests: Consequences of Limited Item Pools and Model Misfit.
    Fischer L; Rohm T; Carstensen CH; Gnambs T
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():633896. PubMed ID: 34295279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On Latent Trait Estimation in Multidimensional Compensatory Item Response Models.
    Wang C
    Psychometrika; 2015 Jun; 80(2):428-49. PubMed ID: 24604245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gibbs-Slice Sampling Algorithm for Estimating the Four-Parameter Logistic Model.
    Zhang J; Lu J; Du H; Zhang Z
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():2121. PubMed ID: 33041882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Testing Differential Item Functioning in Small Samples.
    Belzak WCM
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(5):722-747. PubMed ID: 31583903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.