145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32537289)
1. Implant-based Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Comparing Freeze-dried Aseptic Alloderm and Sterile Ready-to-use Alloderm.
Widmyer AS; Mirhaidari SJ; Wagner DS
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2019 Dec; 7(12):e2530. PubMed ID: 32537289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Comparison of Sterile and Aseptic AlloDerm in 2039 Consecutive Cases.
Parikh RP; Brown GM; Sharma K; Yan Y; Myckatyn TM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Dec; 142(6):1401-1409. PubMed ID: 30204676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sterile "ready-to-use" AlloDerm decreases postoperative infectious complications in patients undergoing immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix.
Weichman KE; Wilson SC; Saadeh PB; Hazen A; Levine JP; Choi M; Karp NS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Oct; 132(4):725-736. PubMed ID: 23783060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between Freeze-dried and Ready-to-use AlloDerm in Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction.
Yuen JC; Yue CJ; Erickson SW; Cooper S; Boneti C; Henry-Tillman R; Klimberg S
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2014 Mar; 2(3):e119. PubMed ID: 25289313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the Safety of a GalaFLEX-AlloDerm Construct in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.
Sigalove S; O'Rorke E; Maxwell GP; Gabriel A
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Oct; 150():75S-81S. PubMed ID: 35943912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 440 Consecutive immediate, implant-based, single-surgeon breast reconstructions in 281 patients: a comparison of early outcomes and costs between SurgiMend fetal bovine and AlloDerm human cadaveric acellular dermal matrices.
Butterfield JL
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 May; 131(5):940-951. PubMed ID: 23629076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Aseptic Freeze-Dried versus Sterile Wet-Packaged Human Cadaveric Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity Score Analysis.
Hanson SE; Meaike JD; Selber JC; Liu J; Li L; Hassid VJ; Baumann DP; Butler CE; Garvey PB
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 May; 141(5):624e-632e. PubMed ID: 29659450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reducing postoperative infections and red breast syndrome in patients with acellular dermal matrix-based breast reconstruction: the relative roles of product sterility and lower body mass index.
Lewis P; Jewell J; Mattison G; Gupta S; Kim H
Ann Plast Surg; 2015 May; 74 Suppl 1():S30-2. PubMed ID: 25695440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Effect of Sterile Acellular Dermal Matrix Use on Complication Rates in Implant-Based Immediate Breast Reconstructions.
Lee JH; Park Y; Choi KW; Chung KJ; Kim TG; Kim YH
Arch Plast Surg; 2016 Nov; 43(6):523-528. PubMed ID: 27896182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surgeon-Controlled Study and Meta-Analysis Comparing FlexHD and AlloDerm in Immediate Breast Reconstruction Outcomes.
Sobti N; Liao EC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Nov; 138(5):959-967. PubMed ID: 27782982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cortiva vs AlloDerm in Prepectoral and Partial Submuscular Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Keane AM; Chiang SN; Tao Y; Pierce A; Gagne J; Margenthaler JA; Tenenbaum MM; Myckatyn TM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38085977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast Reconstruction Using Contour Fenestrated AlloDerm: Does Improvement in Design Translate to Improved Outcomes?
Frey JD; Alperovich M; Weichman KE; Wilson SC; Hazen A; Saadeh PB; Levine JP; Choi M; Karp NS
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2015 Sep; 3(9):e505. PubMed ID: 26495218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Direct to Implant Immediate Breast Reconstruction.
Mirhaidari SJ; Azouz V; Wagner DS
Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Mar; 84(3):263-270. PubMed ID: 31663934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Meta-analysis of Studies Comparing Outcomes of Diverse Acellular Dermal Matrices for Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.
Lee KT; Mun GH
Ann Plast Surg; 2017 Jul; 79(1):115-123. PubMed ID: 28509698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictors of Complications and Comparison of Outcomes Using SurgiMend Fetal Bovine and AlloDerm Human Cadaveric Acellular Dermal Matrices in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.
Ricci JA; Treiser MD; Tao R; Jiang W; Guldbrandsen G; Halvorson E; Hergrueter CA; Chun YS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Oct; 138(4):583e-591e. PubMed ID: 27673529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reducing Expansion Visits in Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Prepectoral and Subpectoral Expander Placement.
Wormer BA; Valmadrid AC; Ganesh Kumar N; Al Kassis S; Rankin TM; Kaoutzanis C; Higdon KK
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Aug; 144(2):276-286. PubMed ID: 31348326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Infectious Complications Leading to Explantation in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction With AlloDerm.
Nguyen MD; Chen C; Colakoğlu S; Morris DJ; Tobias AM; Lee BT
Eplasty; 2010 Jun; 10():e48. PubMed ID: 20628580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Meta-analysis Assessing Postsurgical Outcomes between Aseptic and Sterile AlloDerm Regenerative Tissue Matrix.
Macarios D; Griffin L; Chatterjee A; Lee LJ; Milburn C; Nahabedian MY
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2015 Jun; 3(6):e409. PubMed ID: 26180710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Complications in tissue expander breast reconstruction: a comparison of AlloDerm, DermaMatrix, and FlexHD acellular inferior pole dermal slings.
Brooke S; Mesa J; Uluer M; Michelotti B; Moyer K; Neves RI; Mackay D; Potochny J
Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 69(4):347-9. PubMed ID: 22868313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Different Acellular Dermal Matrices in Breast Reconstruction: The 50/50 Study.
Pittman TA; Fan KL; Knapp A; Frantz S; Spear SL
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Mar; 139(3):521-528. PubMed ID: 28234811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
