235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32537695)
1. Economic Modelling of Screen-and-Treat Strategies for Brazilian Women at Risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.
Simoes Correa-Galendi J; Del Pilar Estevez Diz M; Stock S; Müller D
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2021 Jan; 19(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 32537695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Economic modeling of risk-adapted screen-and-treat strategies in women at high risk for breast or ovarian cancer.
Müller D; Danner M; Schmutzler R; Engel C; Wassermann K; Stollenwerk B; Stock S; Rhiem K
Eur J Health Econ; 2019 Jul; 20(5):739-750. PubMed ID: 30790097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-Effectiveness of Gene-Specific Prevention Strategies for Ovarian and Breast Cancer.
Wei X; Sun L; Slade E; Fierheller CT; Oxley S; Kalra A; Sia J; Sideris M; McCluggage WG; Bromham N; Dworzynski K; Rosenthal AN; Brentnall A; Duffy S; Evans DG; Yang L; Legood R; Manchanda R
JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Feb; 7(2):e2355324. PubMed ID: 38334999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-Effectiveness of Population-Based Multigene Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Prevention.
Guo F; Adekanmbi V; Hsu CD; Berenson AB; Kuo YF; Shih YT
JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Feb; 7(2):e2356078. PubMed ID: 38353949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-effectiveness of Population-Based BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C, RAD51D, BRIP1, PALB2 Mutation Testing in Unselected General Population Women.
Manchanda R; Patel S; Gordeev VS; Antoniou AC; Smith S; Lee A; Hopper JL; MacInnis RJ; Turnbull C; Ramus SJ; Gayther SA; Pharoah PDP; Menon U; Jacobs I; Legood R
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2018 Jul; 110(7):714-725. PubMed ID: 29361001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of Population-Wide Genomic Screening for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer in the United States.
Guzauskas GF; Garbett S; Zhou Z; Spencer SJ; Smith HS; Hao J; Hassen D; Snyder SR; Graves JA; Peterson JF; Williams MS; Veenstra DL
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Oct; 3(10):e2022874. PubMed ID: 33119106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of different strategies to prevent breast and ovarian cancer in German women with a BRCA 1 or 2 mutation.
Müller D; Danner M; Rhiem K; Stollenwerk B; Engel C; Rasche L; Borsi L; Schmutzler R; Stock S
Eur J Health Econ; 2018 Apr; 19(3):341-353. PubMed ID: 28382503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of preventive strategies for women with a BRCA1 or a BRCA2 mutation.
Anderson K; Jacobson JS; Heitjan DF; Zivin JG; Hershman D; Neugut AI; Grann VR
Ann Intern Med; 2006 Mar; 144(6):397-406. PubMed ID: 16549852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-Effectiveness and Net Monetary Benefit of Olaparib Maintenance Therapy Versus No Maintenance Therapy After First-line Platinum-based Chemotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Advanced BRCA1/2-mutated Ovarian Cancer in the Italian National Health Service.
Armeni P; Borsoi L; Fornaro G; Jommi C; Colombo N; Costa F
Clin Ther; 2020 Jul; 42(7):1192-1209.e12. PubMed ID: 32591103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Decision-analytic evaluation of the comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of strategies to prevent breast and ovarian cancer in German women with BRCA-1/2 mutations.
Hallsson LR; Sroczynski G; Engel J; Siebert U
BMC Cancer; 2023 Jun; 23(1):590. PubMed ID: 37365514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-utility analysis of risk-reducing strategies to prevent breast and ovarian cancer in BRCA-mutation carriers in Switzerland.
Bommer C; Lupatsch J; Bürki N; Schwenkglenks M
Eur J Health Econ; 2022 Jul; 23(5):807-821. PubMed ID: 34767113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation of Germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 Testing in UK Women with Ovarian Cancer.
Eccleston A; Bentley A; Dyer M; Strydom A; Vereecken W; George A; Rahman N
Value Health; 2017 Apr; 20(4):567-576. PubMed ID: 28407998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-effectiveness of population screening for BRCA mutations in Ashkenazi jewish women compared with family history-based testing.
Manchanda R; Legood R; Burnell M; McGuire A; Raikou M; Loggenberg K; Wardle J; Sanderson S; Gessler S; Side L; Balogun N; Desai R; Kumar A; Dorkins H; Wallis Y; Chapman C; Taylor R; Jacobs C; Tomlinson I; Beller U; Menon U; Jacobs I
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2015 Jan; 107(1):380. PubMed ID: 25435542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of testing for breast cancer susceptibility genes.
Holland ML; Huston A; Noyes K
Value Health; 2009; 12(2):207-16. PubMed ID: 18647256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effectiveness of surveillance and prevention strategies in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.
Yamauchi H; Nakagawa C; Kobayashi M; Kobayashi Y; Mano T; Nakamura S; Arai M
Breast Cancer; 2018 Mar; 25(2):141-150. PubMed ID: 29019095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost Effectiveness of Risk-Reducing Mastectomy versus Surveillance in BRCA Mutation Carriers with a History of Ovarian Cancer.
Gamble C; Havrilesky LJ; Myers ER; Chino JP; Hollenbeck S; Plichta JK; Kelly Marcom P; Shelley Hwang E; Kauff ND; Greenup RA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Oct; 24(11):3116-3123. PubMed ID: 28699130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Specifying the ovarian cancer risk threshold of 'premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy' for ovarian cancer prevention: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Manchanda R; Legood R; Antoniou AC; Gordeev VS; Menon U
J Med Genet; 2016 Sep; 53(9):591-9. PubMed ID: 27354448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Canadian cost-effectiveness model of BRCA-driven surgical prevention of breast/ovarian cancers compared to treatment if cancer develops.
Hurry M; Eccleston A; Dyer M; Hoskins P
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2020 Apr; 36(2):104-112. PubMed ID: 32423520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-Effectiveness of BRCA 1/2 Genetic Test and Preventive Strategies: Using Real-World Data From an Upper-Middle Income Country.
Lourenção M; Simões Correa Galendi J; Galvão HCR; Antoniazzi AP; Grasel RS; Carvalho AL; Mauad EC; de Oliveira JHC; Reis RM; Mandrik O; Palmero EI
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():951310. PubMed ID: 35898894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Testing strategies for Lynch syndrome in people with endometrial cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.
Stinton C; Jordan M; Fraser H; Auguste P; Court R; Al-Khudairy L; Madan J; Grammatopoulos D; Taylor-Phillips S
Health Technol Assess; 2021 Jun; 25(42):1-216. PubMed ID: 34169821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
